Loading…
Loading…
New Mexico · Nonprofit
ANIMAL PROTECTION NEW MEXICO (New Mexico) is funded by 51 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $6,970,333 in grants to it, the largest being THE BRIDGE FOUNDATION INC ($4,346,000). 31 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
ANIMAL PROTECTION NEW MEXICO's revenue grew 73% between 2017 and 2024.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,477 animals nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
99% of ANIMAL PROTECTION NEW MEXICO’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (74% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
$300 from 1 funders in 2025, up from $1.2M and 11 in 2017.
14 of 51 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 12% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of ANIMAL PROTECTION NEW MEXICO’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 51 funders by total. Association, not causation.
ANIMAL PROTECTION NEW MEXICO leans on a few funders — its largest provides 62% of grant income and the top three 69%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 96% · 2018 88% · 2019 76% · 2020 79% · 2021 12% · 2022 22% · 2023 25% · 2024 34% · 2025 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
47% of ANIMAL PROTECTION NEW MEXICO's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 61% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
ANIMAL PROTECTION NEW MEXICO draws 85% of its grant income from funders outside New Mexico — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 21 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 51 funders put you typical among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
64% of spending goes to programs.
43%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Operates in 1 state
Part of a family of 1 related entity
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 51funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing