Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

William J and Dorothy K O'Neill Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$5.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
185
Grants FY2024still arriving
21
States reached
$290k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0176% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.

Human Services$6.6MEducation$4.1MHealth$3.1MPhilanthropy$2.8MCommunity Improvement$2.6MHousing & Shelter$1.6MRecreation & Sports$1.2MReligion$1.0MEmployment$982kOther$14M
02FY2024 · 185 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k96 grants · $297k
  • $10k–50k55 grants · $1.2M
  • $50k–250k33 grants · $3.6M
  • $250k+1 grant · $290k
$7,500
Median grant
21
States reached
$104M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SEMINAR NETWORK INC AKA STAND TOGETHER TRUST$290,000
MERCY CENTER INC$200,000
UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND$200,000
SISTERS OF CHARITY FOUNDATION OF CLEVELAND$200,000
WOODSON CENTER$190,000
GIVEDIRECTLY$162,600
THE CHILD CENTER OF NY$150,000
CHN HOUSING PARTNERS$150,000
CENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES$150,000
COMMUNITY OF HOPE$150,000
RUTLAND COUNTY PARENT-CHILD CENTER$150,000
MAMATOTO VILLAGE$150,000
UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS HEALTH SYSTEM INC$125,000
GROUNDSWELL FUND$106,550
BIRTHING BEAUTIFUL COMMUNITIES$106,550
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $6.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%YOU GOTTA BELIEVE THE OLDER CHILD ADOPTION & PERMANENCY MOVEMENT INC: $36k → 20%KINGSBRIDGE HEIGHTS COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $56k → 28%FOCUSING FAMILIES: $50k → 14%BOYS TOWN CENTRAL FLORIDA: $50k → 11%IDIGNITY INC: $58k → 13%VAIL VALLEY CHARITABLE FUND: $50k → 7%RUTLAND COUNTY PARENT CHILD CENTER: $150k → 12%YOU GOTTA BELIEVE THE OLDER CHILD ADOPTION & PERMANENCY MOVEMENT INC: $35k → 20%KINGSBRIDGE HEIGHTS COMMUNITY CENTER: $40k → 28%FOCUSING FAMILIES: $40k → 14%RUTLAND COUNTY PARENT-CHILD CENTER: $150k → 12%THRIVE PENINSULA: $50k → 17%RUTLAND COUNTY PARENT-CHILD CENTER: $150k → 12%UPTOGETHER: $75k → 10%HOPE COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $48k → 13%MAMATOTO VILLAGE: $150k → 14%MAMATOTO VILLAGE: $150k → 14%MAMATOTO VILLAGE: $150k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON-HOUSTON: $83k → 16%THE WOMEN'S HOME: $58k → 16%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON-HOUSTON: $58k → 16%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON-HOUSTON: $50k → 16%GRAHAM WINDHAM: $41k → 20%LIGHTHOUSE CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $50k → 13%GRAHAM WINDHAM: $40k → 20%NORTHWEST ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES: $45k → 16%CENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES: $150k → 19%CENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES: $150k → 19%FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER ORLANDO: $45k → 13%CENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES: $150k → 19%COMMUNITY FAMILY CENTERS: $50k → 16%COMMUNITY FAMILY CENTERS: $40k → 16%CENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES: $40k → 19%THE JEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $50k → 17%CENTER FOR INDEPENDENCE OF THE DISABLED NY: $56k → 17%RESOURCES FOR CHILDREN WITH SPECIAL NEEDS DBA INCLUDENYC: $41k → 17%THE REFUGEE RESPONSE: $50k → 17%HUDSON GUILD: $50k → 17%HUDSON GUILD: $50k → 17%HUDSON GUILD: $50k → 17%WEST SIDE CATHOLIC CENTER: $58k → 17%WEST SIDE CATHOLIC CENTER: $40k → 17%SPENCE-CHAPIN SERVICES TO FAMILIES AND CHILDREN: $50k → 17%THE CENTERS FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN: $125k → 17%THE CENTERS FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN: $125k → 17%THE CENTERS: $125k → 17%THE CENTERS FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN: $100k → 17%UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT: $48k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
LA
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$31M · 314 repeat orgs$5.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

314 repeat relationships — 118 still active in FY2024, 196 since wound down; 36 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

314
244

Total granted

$31M
$4.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+20%

Still filing today

84%
74%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $707k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthEnvironmentAnimalsPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    Mercy Center Inc
    5× · 2019–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +86%
  • CO
    COMMUNITY OF HOPE
    7× · 2018–2024 · $954k · revenue +98%
  • TU
    THE UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $918k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • BH
    BUILDING HOPE IN THE CITY
    one grant, 2021 · $84k · revenue +7%
  • EC
    ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC
    one grant, 2021 · $84k
  • United Way of Greater Houston
    one grant, 2020 · $83k · revenue +10%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
2
Common Impact Inc

Common impact's mission is to strengthen the capacity of social change organizations, enabling them to better run and scale their programs. through its partnership with companies, common impact taps into the business skills and expertise…

Unclassified
3
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
4
Opportunity Partners

Mission: together we advance the quality of life for people with disabilities. vision: people of all abilities thrive in the world. values: impact- generate solutions that make a difference. choice - create opportunities for people to lead…

Employment
5
Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation

The neighborhood reinvestment corporation (d.b.a neighborworks america) is a congressionally chartered public non-profit corporation that creates opportunities for people to live in affordable homes, improve their lives, and strengthen…

—
6
Wayside House Inc

Our mission is to break the cycle of addiction and trauma for women, children, and families.

—
7
Jewish Family and Children's Service of Minneapolis

Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.

Human Services
8
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

—
9
Marrakech Inc

Provides person-centered and inclusive services to children and adults with and without disabilities that includes securing employment, connecting to necessary supportive services, accessing housing and participating fully as contributing…

Employment
10
Western Healthconnect

Support significant improvements in health care delivery and outcomes within the context of nonprofit, charitable ownership.

Health
11
Social Current Inc

Social current's mission as developed and approved by its board of directors is to advocate for and implement equitable solutions to society's toughest challenges through collaboration, innovation, policy, and practice excellence.

Human Services
12
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Promise of Greater Cleveland and the most unlike its peers is Catsnip Hawaii. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPregnancy Support ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Senior Support ServicesEnvironmental Conservation …Food Banks and PantriesJewish Community Organizati…Cancer Support ServicesCommunity FoundationsPolicy Research and AdvocacyCommunity Arts CentersLocal History MuseumsYouth Sports ProgramsCommunity FoundationsPublic Library OperationsYouth Development CentersChristian Missionary Organi…Women & Girls Leadership De…Military Veterans SupportFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Volunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Affordable Housing Construc…Orchestra and Ensemble Perf…Animal Rescue and ShelterEquine Therapy ProgramsImmigrant Worker SupportLocal Food System Organizat…Developmental Disabilities …Affordable Housing Developm…Elementary Literacy TutoringYouth Development ServicesDomestic Violence ServicesCommunity College Foundatio…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Independent K-12 SchoolsUnited Way Affiliates
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%30%20–35yr13%28%35–55yr16%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr16%27%20–35yr13%30%35–55yr16%29%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.8%4/519
the rest of the field
13%
240,392/1,819,046

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

499 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 499 of the 610 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
101
Early backer (in before they grew)
487/499
Grantees still filing
357/499
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE EDUCATIONAL ALLIANCE INC — $758,500 · OtherTHE EDUCATIONAL ALLIANCE INCUNIVERSITY HOSPITALS HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $620,000 · OtherTHE CHILD CENTER OF NY INC — $525,000 · OtherMercy Center Inc — $1,000,000 · OtherMercy Center IncSISTERS OF CHARITY FOUNDATION OF CLEVELAND — $795,000 · OtherSISTERS OF CHARITY FOUNDATION OF CLEVELANDTOWARDS EMPLOYMENT INC — $480,000 · OtherTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC — $575,000 · Other+84 more — $8,730,786 · Other+84 moreGIVEDIRECTLY INC — $569,100 · Human ServicesGIVEDIRECTLY INCCENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES INC — $515,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR URBAN FAM…MAMATOTO VILLAGE INC — $505,000 · Human ServicesMAMATOTO VILLAGE INCThe Centers for Families and Children — $503,500 · Human ServicesThe Centers for Fami…Rutland County Parent Child Center Inc — $450,000 · Human ServicesRutland County Paren…CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON - HOUSTON — $190,600 · Human Services+31 more — $2,896,012 · Human Services+31 moreLiteracy Partners Inc — $502,500 · EducationLiteracy Par…CUYAHOGA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $481,000 · EducationCUYAHOGA COM…THE SEMINAR NETWORK INC — $340,000 · EducationTHE SEMINAR …OHIO WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $305,000 · EducationOHIO WESLEYA…HAWKEN SCHOOL — $257,950 · EducationHAWKEN SCHOO…BIRTHING BEAUTIFUL COMMUNITIES — $194,050 · EducationBIRTHING BEA…ANNE ARUNDEL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $155,000 · EducationNORTHSIDE CENTER FOR CHILD DEVELOPMENT INC — $151,000 · EducationSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $140,000 · EducationKENYON COLLEGE — $130,000 · Education+11 more — $947,850 · Education+11 moreTHE METROHEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $397,673 · HealthTHE METRO…UNITED HOSPITAL FUND OF NEW YORK — $381,000 · HealthUNITED HO…FIVE MOUNTAINS HAWAII INC — $246,525 · HealthFIVE MOUN…GREEN & HEALTHY HOMES INITIATIVE INC — $211,825 · HealthGREEN & H…Beech Brook — $200,000 · HealthBeech Bro…LUMINIS HEALTH INC — $175,000 · HealthLUMINIS H…NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CARE INC — $115,706 · HealthANNAPOLIS WELLNESS CORPORATION — $100,000 · HealthLUMINIS HEALTH ANNE ARUNDEL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 · Health+11 more — $748,800 · Health+11 moreTHE UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC — $917,500 · PhilanthropyGREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $310,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ANNE ARUNDEL CO — $249,000 · PhilanthropyGroundswell Fund — $201,550 · PhilanthropyTHE VERMONT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $160,000 · PhilanthropyTHE NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST — $132,500 · PhilanthropyHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $115,000 · PhilanthropyHEART OF FLORIDA UNITED WAY INC — $90,000 · PhilanthropyUnited Way of Greater Houston — $82,500 · Philanthropy+3 more — $187,850 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY OF HOPE — $953,875 · Community ImprovementWOODSON CENTER — $329,000 · Community ImprovementNORTH KOHALA COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER — $278,250 · Community ImprovementVIBRANT HAWAII — $222,775 · Community ImprovementENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC — $210,000 · Community ImprovementTHE ARAB-AMERICAN FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER INC — $130,000 · Community ImprovementBROC COMMUNITY ACTION IN SOUTHWESTERN VERMONT — $105,000 · Community ImprovementPARTNERS IN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION — $94,618 · Community Improvement+2 more — $120,000 · Community ImprovementCHN HOUSING PARTNERS — $335,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE LIGHT HOUSE INC — $292,500 · Housing & ShelterVOLUNTEER LEGAL ADVOCATES — $176,000 · Housing & ShelterDISTRICT ALLIANCE FOR SAFE HOUSING INC — $160,000 · Housing & ShelterMANNA INC — $96,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE PARTNERSHIP TO END HOMELESSNESS INC — $90,000 · Housing & ShelterROC USA LLC — $60,000 · Housing & ShelterHousing Plus Solutions Inc — $56,000 · Housing & ShelterNEW DESTINY HOUSING CORPORATION — $55,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$13,484,286Human Services$5,629,212Education$3,604,350Health$2,676,529Philanthropy$2,445,900Community Improvement$2,443,518Housing & Shelter$1,320,500

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMercy Center Inc — $1,000,000 over 5y, 8.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY OF HOPE — $953,875 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC — $917,500 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetSISTERS OF CHARITY FOUNDATION OF CLEVELAND — $795,000 over 5y, 6.7% of budgetTHE EDUCATIONAL ALLIANCE INC — $758,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC — $575,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGIVEDIRECTLY INC — $569,100 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CHILD CENTER OF NY INC — $525,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES INC — $515,000 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetMAMATOTO VILLAGE INC — $505,000 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetThe Centers for Families and Children — $503,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetLiteracy Partners Inc — $502,500 over 5y, 5.5% of budgetCUYAHOGA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $481,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetTOWARDS EMPLOYMENT INC — $480,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetRutland County Parent Child Center Inc — $450,000 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetTHE METROHEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $397,673 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetSTRATTON MOUNTAIN & VALLEY COMMUNITY BENEFIT FOUNDATION INC — $385,025 over 6y, 16% of budgetUNITED HOSPITAL FUND OF NEW YORK — $381,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE FUTURE — $380,000 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetTHE SEMINAR NETWORK INC — $340,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHN HOUSING PARTNERS — $335,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetWOODSON CENTER — $329,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $310,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetOHIO WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $305,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LIGHT HOUSE INC — $292,500 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetNORTH KOHALA COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER — $278,250 over 7y, 15% of budgetHAWKEN SCHOOL — $257,950 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ANNE ARUNDEL CO — $249,000 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetFIVE MOUNTAINS HAWAII INC — $246,525 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetVIBRANT HAWAII — $222,775 over 3y, 28% of budgetGREEN & HEALTHY HOMES INITIATIVE INC — $211,825 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetHUNGER FREE VERMONT INC — $210,025 over 4y, 5.2% of budgetENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC — $210,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGroundswell Fund — $201,550 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetBeech Brook — $200,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetDEEP SOUTH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL — $200,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetBIRTHING BEAUTIFUL COMMUNITIES — $194,050 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON - HOUSTON — $190,600 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetVOLUNTEER LEGAL ADVOCATES — $176,000 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetCENTER FOR ALTERNATIVE SENTENCING AND EMPLOYMENT SERVICES INC — $176,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetYWCA of Annapolis & Anne Arundel County Maryland Inc — $175,000 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetLUMINIS HEALTH INC — $175,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetPER SCHOLAS INC — $167,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE FAMILY PLACE — $165,000 over 4y, 7.3% of budgetDISTRICT ALLIANCE FOR SAFE HOUSING INC — $160,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetTHE VERMONT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $160,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetANNE ARUNDEL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $155,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetNORTHSIDE CENTER FOR CHILD DEVELOPMENT INC — $151,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The George Gund Found…Higley Fund of the Cl…The Abington Foundati…United Way of Greater…The Reinberger Founda…The Cleveland Foundat…Community Foundation …The Char and Chuck Fo…Mt Sinai Health Care …The Swagelok Foundati…Thomas H White Fdn TaTreu Mart Fund
The George Gund FoundationOH54× affinity31 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The George Gund Foundation · Higley Fund of the Cleveland Foundation · The Abington Foundation · United Way of Greater Cleveland · The Reinberger Foundation · The Cleveland Foundation · Community Foundation of Anne Arundel Co · The Char and Chuck Fowler Family Foundation · Mt Sinai Health Care Foundation · The Swagelok Foundation · Thomas H White Fdn Ta · Treu Mart Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization William J and Dorothy K O'Neill Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 120%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Green & Healthy Homes Initiative Inc — 100% of income from government
  • Homeless Services Network of Central Florida Inc — 87% of income from government
  • Rutland County Parent Child Center Inc — 50% of income from government
  • Seeds 4 Success Inc — 48% of income from government
  • Center for Urban Families Inc — 36% of income from government
  • Hunger Free Vermont Inc — 24% of income from government
  • Enterprise Community Partners Inc — 22% of income from government
  • Moveable Feast Inc — 18% of income from government
  • Vermont Foodbank — 13% of income from government
  • Idignity Inc — 6% of income from government
  • Catholic Charities of Central Florida Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Burr & Burton Seminary — 2% of income from government
  • Annapolis Maritime Museum Inc — 2% of income from government
  • The United Way of Central Maryland Inc — 2% of income from government
  • The Nemours Foundation — 0% of income from government
  • Heart of Florida United Way Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood of Maryland Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Hope Community Center Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
  • The Vermont Community Foundation — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
12get no government money at all
83report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to William J and Dorothy K O'Neill Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to William J and Dorothy K O'Neill Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 610 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines