· Private foundation
The Swagelok Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k189 grants · $408k
- $10k–50k26 grants · $344k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $615k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $201,000 |
| CUYAHOGA COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY | $100,000 |
| CLEVELAND FOODBANK INC | $81,467 |
| MANUFACTURING WORKS | $62,500 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $60,000 |
| GREATER CLEVELAND PARTNERSHIP | $60,000 |
| TEAM NEO | $50,000 |
| GREATER CLEVELAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $24,000 |
| AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION | $22,929 |
| FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER CLEVELAND | $20,027 |
| CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF CLEVELAND | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $18,420 |
| CUYAHOGA COMM COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $17,500 |
| MIAMI UNIVERSITY | $15,000 |
| GREAT LAKES SCIENCE CENTER | $13,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $476k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +14% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.
292 repeat relationships — 165 still active in FY2025, 127 since wound down; 54 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $307k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GCGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC6× · 2020–2025 · $262k · revenue +10%
- CMCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART4× · 2020–2023 · $200k · revenue +23%
- MWMANUFACTURING WORKS6× · 2020–2025 · $173k · revenue +73%
Funded once
- ECEAST CLEVELAND SCHOOL DISTRICTone grant, 2022 · $75k
- UHUNIVERSITY HOSPITALS RAINBOW BABIES AND CHILDRENone grant, 2021 · $20k
- TOTHE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITYone grant, 2023 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Greater cleveland volunteers enriches the community and indivuduals through volunteer service. volunteers age 18 and older are recruited and placed in the agency's programs or referred to local nonprofit or public organizations to help…
To lead and equip ohio philanthropy to be effective partners for change in our communities.
To harness the collective expertise of ohio's ceos to advocate for policies that improve ohio's economic competitiveness.
United way of central ohio is the local organization that harnesses the power of communities working together - people, nonprofits, businesses and government - to create a stronger, more equitable central ohio. see schedule o.we do this…
To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.
The ohio state bar association (the "association") is an unincorporated voluntary non-profit organization. the association was formed to promote justice and advance the interests of the legal profession.
Advancing a thriving central ohio commmunity by serving as a catalyst for all businesses to grow and flourish. our mission pillars are connections, government relations, strategic business solutions and talent/workforce.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
Diabetes partnership of cleveland works to provide relevant and sustainable programming, education, resources and supplies to the community in northeast ohio affected by diabetes.
Provide comprehensive services that benefit the financial institution industry in ohio.
The mission of ohio life sciences foundation is to accelerate bioscience discovery, innovation and commercialization of global value, driving economic growth, company attraction, improving workforce training and improved quality of life in…
Align the life sciences ecosystem in the state of ohio, building collaborative partnerships, and advocating for policies and funding that will help to accelerate life science priorities and drive sustainable economic growth.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Promise of Greater Cleveland and the most unlike its peers is Bainbridge Auburn Battle Bots. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.2% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
408 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 408 of the 559 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds MANUFACTURING WORKS ↗
- Who funds MANUFACTURING ADVOCACY & GROWTH NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL CLEVELAND ↗
- Who funds GREATER CLEVELAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds Team NEO Foundation ↗
- Who funds USS CLEVELAND LEGACY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF CLEVELAND ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CLEVELAND ↗
- Who funds THE GATHERING PLACE ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER CLEVELAND ↗
- Who funds TOWARDS EMPLOYMENT INC ↗
- Who funds Greater Cleveland Partnership ↗
- Who funds BUSINESS VOLUNTEERS UNLIMITED ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE NOW GREATER CLEVELAND INC ↗
- Who funds VOCATIONAL GUIDANCE SERVICES ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF AKRON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE CLEVELAND FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CORNERSTONE OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds Engage Cleveland Inc ↗
- Who funds ACHIEVEMENT CENTERS FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds URSULINE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds YOUTH OPPORTUNITIES UNLIMITED ↗
- Who funds CLEVELAND ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Cleveland Foundation · The George Gund Foundation · The Char and Chuck Fowler Family Foundation · The Reinberger Foundation · The Lozick Family Foundation · Higley Fund of the Cleveland Foundation · Akron Community Foundation · Burton D Morgan Foundation Inc · The Sk Wellman Foundation · The Helen F & Louis Stolier Family Foundation · Jewish Federation of Cleveland · The Cleveland Clinic Foundation Group Return
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Swagelok Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- 2ND Act Org Inc — 5% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.