Skip to content

Minnesota · Nonprofit

GLOBAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN

GLOBAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN (Minnesota) receives grants from 29 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,794,117 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($388,650). 18 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 61% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$259k
Funders on record
29
Grants received
$1.8M
Net assets
$70k
18/29 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 32%
01What it does

What Global Rights for Women does

Mission

Global Rights for Women is dedicated to promoting women's human rights internationally with a focus on achieving effective legal reform on violence against women.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Program

On its FY2025 return the organization reported a significant change in how it conducts a program.

Global Rights for Women has merged with batter women's justice project (bwjp). Together they have launched the center on Global Rights for Women.

Its own explanation, from Schedule O of that return (Part III, line 3).

  1. Global Rights for Women philippines - in 2025, grw worked with local partners in metro manila to build capacity to achieve systemic improvements in the legal system. This work was focused on new reforms to law and policy on sexual assault, domestic violence, child abuse and sex trafficking. Grw traveled to the philippines twice in 2025 to meet in person with local advocates and continue this work. Tanzania - grw continued its work with tanzanian network of legal aid providers (tanlap) a local ngo in dar es salaam to achieve systemic reforms on violence against women. Grw consulted with tanlap on strategies to draft and pass a dedicated law prohibiting all forms of violence against women and to improve legal representation for survivors of violence. In february 2025, grw traveled to tanzania in furtherance of this work. Armenia - in 2025, in collaboration with the womens support center (wsc) in yerevan, grw drafted the report, advancing the domestic violence agenda in armenia, based on our in-person visits, interviews and document review. The report will be published in 2026.

    $226,079 spent$16,350 earned by the program
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2025 Form 990. Program spending in total: $226,079.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($578k) Expenses 100 ($715k) Net assets 100 ($193k)2018 Revenue 110 ($634k) Expenses 69 ($496k) Net assets 172 ($331k)2019 Revenue 94 ($545k) Expenses 71 ($504k) Net assets 192 ($372k)2020 Revenue 101 ($586k) Expenses 76 ($543k) Net assets 215 ($415k)2021 Revenue 156 ($902k) Expenses 93 ($666k) Net assets 337 ($650k)2022 Revenue 178 ($1.0M) Expenses 132 ($943k) Net assets 382 ($738k)2023 Revenue 143 ($827k) Expenses 131 ($933k) Net assets 327 ($632k)2024 Revenue 132 ($763k) Expenses 117 ($836k) Net assets 307 ($593k)2025 Revenue 45 ($259k) Expenses 48 ($342k) Net assets 36 ($70k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (45)Expenses (48)Net assets (36)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2024 to 2025, from $635k to $81k (−87%).

$231k
$362k
$414k
$474k
$676k
$829k
$691k
$635k
$81k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2020 14% · 2021 11% · 2024 2%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$136k
’17
$138k
’18
$40k
’19
$43k
’20
$235k
’21
$88k
’22
−$106k
’23
−$73k
’24
−$84k
’25
2.6
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed91213141417191715
Joined·+4+3+4+2+3+3+3+2
No longer listed·12320154
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 9 funders to 19 funders, grant income rose $113k → $263k.

11 of 29 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 61% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of GLOBAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

GLOBAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 22% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

62% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund GLOBAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN.

22%
largest funder
53%
top three
~8
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 31% · 2018 27% · 2019 23% · 2020 19% · 2021 35% · 2022 22% · 2023 20% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

81% of GLOBAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 62% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

61% of GLOBAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $694k that is directly attributable, 91% of it comes from Minnesota funders.

MN
WI
MI
NY
IA
OH

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Minnesota out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $1.1M arriving through sponsors registered in 9 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like GLOBAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Minnesota

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

66% of spending goes to programs.

Program 66%Management 22%Fundraising 11%

Governance

3
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

82%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

MN

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for GLOBAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds GLOBAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN?
GLOBAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN (Minnesota) receives grants from 29 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,794,117 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($388,650). 18 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 61% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does GLOBAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN have?
IRS filings report 29 organizations giving $1,794,117 in grants to GLOBAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN, 18 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of GLOBAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN?
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND is the largest funder on record, with $388,650 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like GLOBAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Minnesota. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Global Rights for Women →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 29 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing