· Private foundation
Vyuha Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k7 grants · $35k
- $10k–50k58 grants · $915k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WORLD MONUMENTS FUND | $50,000 |
| ROYAL ACADEMY AMERICA FUND AT MYRIAD USA | $20,000 |
| WORLD WILDLIFE FUND | $20,000 |
| CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC | $20,000 |
| ACTION AGAINST HUNGER | $20,000 |
| LINCOLN CENTER THEATER | $20,000 |
| MAIN STREET MISSIONS CORPORATION | $20,000 |
| ROYAL SHAKESPEARE COMPANY AMERICA (RSC AMERICA) | $20,000 |
| ADRIENNE ARSHT CENTER TRUST INC | $20,000 |
| THE NEW YORK PUBLIC LIBRARY (NYPL) | $20,000 |
| TRENTON AREA SOUP KITCHEN (TASK) | $20,000 |
| NORTH FLORIDA WILDLIFE CENTER INC | $20,000 |
| AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY | $20,000 |
| INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART MIAMI (ICA MIAMI) | $20,000 |
| NEW HOPE SOLEBURY EDUCATION FUND | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $353k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 61% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
557 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 540 since wound down; 27 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $510k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC8× · 2017–2025 · $246k · revenue +62%
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC6× · 2018–2024 · $123k · revenue +89%- STSKY'S THE LIMIT FUND3× · 2020–2025 · $115k · revenue +50%
Funded once
- BIBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $115k · revenue +28%
- WMWOMEN MAKE MOVIES INCone grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue +7%
- IFISHA FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2023 · $69k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.
Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.
The friends are dedicated to the rescue, protection, and adoption of companion animals in need while inspiring the human-animal bond. we meet our mission by:-saving 100% of healthy and treatable animals.-providing high-quality animal care…
The organization's mission is to build partnerships to enhance compassionate care globally. we are dedicated to improving access to hospice and palliative care worldwide.
The primary mission of the humane society is to end animal cruelty, neglect and overpopulation in south carolina.
To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.
Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…
Paws chicago is a national leader in the no kill animal welfare movement, helping more than 23,842 homeless and at-risk pets each year through comprehensive spay/neuter, medical, and adoption programs.
The mission of safe haven for cats is to use no-kill principles and education to save cats' lives through rescue, adoption, spay/neuter services and community programs.
Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…
To be a leading advocate for all animals, to maximize the healing power animals have on the human spirit, and to provide shelter, safety, and second chances to animals in need.
Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Neighbors 4 Neighbors and the most unlike its peers is A Stone Music Therapy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
854 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 854 of the 1,471 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds SKY'S THE LIMIT FUND ↗
- Who funds BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC ↗
- Who funds DEPAUL USA INC ↗
- Who funds NEW HOPE SOLEBURY EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds ALIGHT ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF GREATER MIAMI INC ↗
- Who funds ACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA ↗
- Who funds NORTH FLORIDA WILDLIFE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds KHAN ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds ADRIENNE ARSHT CENTER TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds Wildlife Conservation Society ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds STYLE SAVES INC ↗
- Who funds MIAMI SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds Royal Academy America Inc ↗
- Who funds THE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD MONUMENTS FUND INC ↗
- Who funds MAIN STREET MISSIONS INC ↗
- Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds VIZCAYA MUSEUM AND GARDENS TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF THE AFRICAN DIASPORA (MOAD) ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF MIAMI INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Batchelor Foundation Inc · The Kirk Foundation · The Miami Foundation Inc · The Frederick a Deluca Foundation Inc · Peacock Foundation Inc · Micky and Madeleine Arison Family Foundation C/O Richard Kohan Afo LLC · Florida Panthers Foundation Inc · Assurant Foundation · Give Lively Foundation Inc · American Express Foundation · United Way Miami Inc · Anthony Abraham Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Vyuha Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- His House Inc — 75% of income from government
- Voices for Children Foundation Inc — 48% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- The Maryland Food Bank Inc — 11% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- The Shriners' Hospital for Children — 6% of income from government
- Habitat for Humanity of Broward Inc — 6% of income from government
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc — 6% of income from government
- Feeding South Florida Inc — 5% of income from government
- Vizcaya Museum and Gardens Trust Inc — 3% of income from government
- Fusion Partnership Inc — 3% of income from government
- Camillus House Inc — 2% of income from government
- Covenant House Florida Inc — 1% of income from government
- New World Symphony Inc — 0% of income from government
- Adrienne Arsht Center Trust Inc — 0% of income from government
- Ar-Rayyan Institute Inc — 0% of income from government
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
- Chapman Partnership Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.