Skip to content

Washington · Nonprofit

Kiran Anjali Project

Kiran Anjali Project (Washington) receives grants from 30 organizations whose IRS filings report $865,569 to it, the largest being AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC ($198,447). 14 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 84% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2024
$311k
Funders on record
30
Grants received
$866k
Net assets
$336k
14/30 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 49%
01What it does

What Kiran Anjali Project does

Mission

To invest in educational programs in India to equip girls to define their own destiny.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Carnation Learning Center - A high-quality preschool and after-school support center in Bangalore serving 95 preschoolers and 88 school aged children. Children are served two nutritious meals per day. 88 graduates of the after-school support program. They receive homework help and a nutritious snack. Older students and adults from the US provide enrichment classes to children in the after-school program.

    $91,305 spentof which $81,692 as grants
    36% of program spending
  2. Udayan Care - consists of 34 chapters across 13 states in India. Shalini means "a dignified woman', and the program's mission is to ensure that every young woman with the thirst for knowledge is not thwarted from pursuing her dreams due to lack of support. With five key objectives, the program aims to: 1)extend financial aid to deserving yet financially disadvantaged female students from government and government-aided schools, facilitating their uninterrupted persuit of education, 2) personalized mentoring, individualized attention, and counseling to foster comprehensive mental, moral and overall personal development, 3) conduct life skills training and personality development workships to augment their skill sets, broaden their understanding of social issues, and widen their horizons 4) equip participants with essential employability skills through tailored training programs, empowering them with insights into various career paths and the professional landscape 5) cultivate social awareness and a sense of responsibilty among participants, instilling in them the ethos of giving back to society upon attaining independence and embarking on their careers.

    $69,374 spentof which $62,070 as grants
    27% of program spending
  3. Baale Mane - A residential home outside Bangalore for girls who have survived neglect and exploitation. 41 girls were supported. Baale conducts art and music classes in addition to English, career counseling, computer workshops, Yoga, dance and sports. A counselor has online meetings with the girls twice a week in addition to one-onone sessions.

    $65,364 spentof which $58,482 as grants
    26% of program spending
  4. Parikrma Center for Learning in Jayanagar - supporting 30 girls in grades 3, 5 and 6 through Parikrma Humanity Foundation, a non-profit organization in Bengaluru (formerly known as Bangalore) with a mission to ensure that even the disadvantaged child from the slums can access the best possible opportunities anywhere in the world. Parikrma provides K-12 education offering scholarships for children to pursue university education in mainstream colleges. They inculcate interest in the world beyond the classroom - through art, sport, theatre, and dance. They run 4 schools and a Junior College for more than 2000 children from 99 slum communities and 5 shelter homes in Bengaluru. Parikrma's 360-degree development model covers every aspect of a child's life- providing English medium education, nutritious meals (3 per day), comprehensive healthcare, and family care to ensure a stable home environment.

    $29,685 spentof which $26,560 as grants
    12% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $255,728.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($283k) Expenses 100 ($235k) Net assets 100 ($160k)2018 Revenue 132 ($375k) Expenses 135 ($317k) Net assets 136 ($218k)2019 Revenue 121 ($342k) Expenses 125 ($293k) Net assets 166 ($267k)2020 Revenue 120 ($340k) Expenses 115 ($271k) Net assets 210 ($336k)2021 Revenue 84 ($239k) Expenses 118 ($277k) Net assets 186 ($298k)2022 Revenue 82 ($234k) Expenses 92 ($216k) Net assets 282 ($451k)2023 Revenue 112 ($317k) Expenses 157 ($369k) Net assets 250 ($400k)2024 Revenue 110 ($311k) Expenses 160 ($375k) Net assets 210 ($336k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (110)Expenses (160)Net assets (210)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $319k to $468k (+47%).

$160k
$265k
$319k
$468k
$431k
$451k
$400k
$336k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

98% of Kiran Anjali Project’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (100% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 4,945 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$49k
’17
$58k
’18
$49k
’19
$69k
’20
−$38k
’21
$18k
’22
−$51k
’23
−$64k
’24
11
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Alexandra Collier Pittle

Executive Director

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed776451099
Joined·+0+1+1+1+7+1+0
No longer listed·0230220
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 9 funders to 11 funders, grant income rose $13k → $155k.

9 of 30 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 84% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Kiran Anjali Project’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Kiran Anjali Project has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 23% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

85% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Kiran Anjali Project.

23%
largest funder
60%
top three
~6
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 43% · 2018 62% · 2019 60% · 2020 46% · 2021 32% · 2022 41% · 2023 31% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

35% of Kiran Anjali Project's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 47% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

84% of Kiran Anjali Project's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $140k that is directly attributable, 83% of it comes from funders outside Washington, across 13 states.

WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
NJ
CA
MO
DE
NC
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Washington out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $726k arriving through sponsors registered in 7 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Kiran Anjali Project is better cushioned than half of the 4,524 international nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−21% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve10.7mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)1% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 4,524 international nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Organizations like Kiran Anjali Project

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

68% of spending goes to programs.

Program 68%Management 15%Fundraising 17%

Governance

8
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

99%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Kiran Anjali Project: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Kiran Anjali Project?
Kiran Anjali Project (Washington) receives grants from 30 organizations whose IRS filings report $865,569 to it, the largest being AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC ($198,447). 14 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 84% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does Kiran Anjali Project have?
IRS filings report 30 organizations giving $865,569 in grants to Kiran Anjali Project, 14 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Kiran Anjali Project?
AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC is the largest funder on record, with $198,447 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Kiran Anjali Project find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Kiran Anjali Project →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 30 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing