Colorado · Nonprofit
BEAUTIFUL REDEMPTION
BEAUTIFUL REDEMPTION (Colorado) receives grants from 21 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,002,920 to it, the largest being THE GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT INC ($459,323). 13 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- Revenue FY2024
- $910k
- Funders on record
- 21
- Grants received
- $1.0M
- Net assets
- $413k
What Beautiful Redemption does
Mission
Beautiful Redemption is the bridge between the faith community and meeting the needs of foster children. We connect the faith community to requests that come from the desk of dhs and the system we use is the only one of its kind. We speak to thousands each year raising awareness to foster care needs, recruiting foster parents and help form wrap around support communities for foster families.
As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.
Programs
Foster family assistance step one - we are the bridge that connects our most needy children & families to community members who want to help. Step two - wrap around services for foster care families. We partner with fostering hope to do this well. Step three - recruit foster parents. We partner with hope & home to accomplish this.
$492,881 spentof which $25,112 as grants85% of program spendingCareportal assistance with careportal fees.
$89,278 spentof which $55,216 as grants15% of program spending
The 2 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $582,159.
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Balance sheet
Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $133k to $357k (+168%).
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2020 6%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
100% of BEAUTIFUL REDEMPTION’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (91% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Leadership and staff
The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.
Board chair
Mark Dunn
Chairman
As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 12 funders, grant income rose $61k → $135k.
8 of 21 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 36% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of BEAUTIFUL REDEMPTION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
BEAUTIFUL REDEMPTION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 46% of grant income and the top three 65%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
89% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund BEAUTIFUL REDEMPTION.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 84% · 2018 58% · 2019 65% · 2020 35% · 2021 38% · 2022 45% · 2023 28% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How long its funders stay
42% of BEAUTIFUL REDEMPTION's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 62% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.
Where its funders are
BEAUTIFUL REDEMPTION draws 80% of its grant income from funders outside Colorado, across 6 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $365k arriving through sponsors registered in 7 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Against its field
BEAUTIFUL REDEMPTION has grown faster than three-quarters of the 21,648 human services nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 21,648 human services nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024
Organizations like BEAUTIFUL REDEMPTION
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Colorado
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
78% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
88%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for BEAUTIFUL REDEMPTION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds BEAUTIFUL REDEMPTION?
- BEAUTIFUL REDEMPTION (Colorado) receives grants from 21 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,002,920 to it, the largest being THE GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT INC ($459,323). 13 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does BEAUTIFUL REDEMPTION have?
- IRS filings report 21 organizations giving $1,002,920 in grants to BEAUTIFUL REDEMPTION, 13 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of BEAUTIFUL REDEMPTION?
- THE GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT INC is the largest funder on record, with $459,323 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like BEAUTIFUL REDEMPTION find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Colorado. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 21 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing