· Public charity
Shelter Partnership Inc
Shelter partnership, inc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k38 grants · $277k
- $10k–50k116 grants · $2.9M
- $50k–250k47 grants · $4.2M
- $250k+1 grant · $330k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DELIVERING GOOD | $330,000 |
| HOMELESS HEALTH CARE LOS ANGELES | $224,131 |
| SAN FERNANDO VALLEY COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CTR INC | $222,959 |
| NORTH VALLEY CARING SERVICES | $185,632 |
| ALTAMED | $174,188 |
| DIDI HIRSCH MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES | $167,721 |
| HEALTHRIGHT 360 | $151,212 |
| VENICE COMMUNITY HOUSING CORPORATION | $146,106 |
| ANTELOPE VALLEY PARTNERS FOR HEALTH | $142,619 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY SANTA FE SPRINGS | $130,880 |
| ST VINCENT CHURCH | $123,573 |
| FATHERS AND MOTHERS WHO CARE INC | $112,776 |
| EL CAMINO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT FOUNDATION | $112,388 |
| SHIELDS FOR FAMILIES | $111,947 |
| THE FID GROUP - FRIENDS IN DEED | $101,544 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $10.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
189 repeat relationships — 156 still active in FY2025, 33 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $260k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HOHEART OF COMPASSION DISTRIBUTION8× · 2017–2025 · $1.9M · revenue +23%
- NVNORTH VALLEY CARING SERVICES8× · 2018–2025 · $1.5M · revenue ×42
- COChristian Outreach Appeal dba Christian Outreach in Action9× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +70% · 43% of their budget
Funded once
- WCWEINGART CENTER ASSOCIATIONgraduated7× · 2017–2023 · $149k · revenue +532%
- ALAV LIVING WATER WORSHIP CENTERgraduated3× · 2021–2023 · $115k · revenue ×12
- USUNITED STATES VETERANS INITIATIVEgraduated7× · 2017–2023 · $74k · revenue +91%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the organization is to ensure safety and stability for people who are battered, abused, homeless or at risk; to create public awareness about the epidemic of violence; and to mobilize the community to prevent violence and…
The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.
Consejo brings healing, health, and hope to communities through holistic, culturally, and linguistically competent behavioral health services and advocacy.
Alcott's mission is to improve the mental health of underserved individuals through integrated social care.
TCC Family Health mission is to provide innovative, integrated, quality health care that will contribute to a healthy community, focusing on those in need and working with patients and the community as partners in their overall well-being.
Mercy house's most significant exempt activities focus on ending homelessness and providing comprehensive housing and support services. the organization offers homeless prevention, rapid rehousing, permanent supportive housing, and…
Casa is a refuge, providing protection and education for people caught in the cylces of domestic violence, sexual assault and child assault. Casa is a healing community where women and children can receive the nurturing and support…
Provide housing and services to the most vulnerable population, especially those transitioning from (or at risk of) homelessness or institutionalization, through a variety of innovative supportive housing models.
Mentorship and housing assistant for women returning from incarceration
Provide residential recovery housing to those who are in recovery from drug and alcohol use and, in many cases, homeless
Our mission is to provide suupporive housing with a safe and compassionate environment and assitance for those in need Our most significant activity is providing shared supportive housing.
The mission of Laurel House (dba Hope Harbor) is providing a home for teens in crisis, transforming lives, and strengthening families. Laurel House has the only long-term youth shelters in Orange County, CA for runaway, homeless and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mental Health America of Los Angeles and the most unlike its peers is New Direction Community Programs. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
301 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HEART OF COMPASSION DISTRIBUTION ↗
- Who funds NORTH VALLEY CARING SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Christian Outreach Appeal dba Christian Outreach in Action ↗
- Who funds Homeless Health Care Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds MENTORS INC MENTORS INC ↗
- Who funds WEST HOLLYWOOD COMMUNITY HOUSING CORP ↗
- Who funds ALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds DELIVERING GOOD INC ↗
- Who funds HEALTHRIGHT 360 ↗
- Who funds ASIAN AMERICAN DRUG ABUSE PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC ↗
- Who funds VENICE COMMUNITY HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds DIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds ANTELOPE VALLEY PARTNERS FOR HEALTH ↗
- Who funds IMMANUEL HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds Wellnest Emotional Health & Wellness ↗
- Who funds San Fernando Valley Community Mental Health Center Inc ↗
- Who funds SHIELDS FOR FAMILIES ↗
- Who funds Fathers and Mothers Who Care ↗
- Who funds PROJECT NEW HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE IN A SUITCASE ↗
- Who funds 1736 FAMILY CRISIS CENTER ↗
- Who funds EL CAMINO COMMUNITY COLLEGE District Foundation ↗
- Who funds JWCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds LA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds East San Gabriel Valley Coalition ↗
- Who funds FEED THE CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds ALL FOR KIDS ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds PARA LOS NINOS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way Inc · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · Los Angeles Regional Food Bank · Weingart Foundation · Baby2baby · California Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The Green Foundation · QueensCare · Food Forward Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Shelter Partnership Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Feed the Children Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.