Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

THE PASADENA VILLAGE

THE PASADENA VILLAGE (California) receives grants from 18 organizations whose IRS filings report $600,152 to it, the largest being Pasadena Community Foundation ($200,900). 9 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 65% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$894k
Funders on record
18
Grants received
$600k
Net assets
$739k
9/18 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 32%
01What it does

What The Pasadena Village does

Mission

The Pasadena Village is an organization of adults over 55 whose mission is to foster vital independent living in a spirit of mutual support, enrichment and inclusiveness.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Program

  1. Provide programs and services to pasadena area residents age 55 and older to enable them to enjoy safe, healthy, satisfying and fruitful lives as they grow older.

    $374,893 spent$14,869 earned by the program
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $374,893.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($215k) Expenses 100 ($238k) Net assets 100 ($148k)2018 Revenue 123 ($265k) Expenses 106 ($253k) Net assets 109 ($161k)2019 Revenue 104 ($224k) Expenses 92 ($219k) Net assets 116 ($171k)2020 Revenue 97 ($208k) Expenses 88 ($209k) Net assets 114 ($169k)2021 Revenue 110 ($237k) Expenses 89 ($213k) Net assets 130 ($193k)2022 Revenue 159 ($342k) Expenses 95 ($225k) Net assets 207 ($307k)2023 Revenue 143 ($309k) Expenses 124 ($295k) Net assets 217 ($321k)2024 Revenue 167 ($360k) Expenses 159 ($379k) Net assets 204 ($302k)2025 Revenue 415 ($894k) Expenses 192 ($457k) Net assets 498 ($739k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (415)Expenses (192)Net assets (498)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2024 to 2025, from $318k to $758k (+139%).

$170k
$168k
$174k
$199k
$195k
$313k
$338k
$318k
$758k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2022 3%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$23k
’17
$13k
’18
$5k
’19
−$1k
’20
$24k
’21
$116k
’22
$14k
’23
−$19k
’24
$437k
’25
20
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Katie Brandon

Executive director

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed191516171917191919
Joined·+2+1+12+5+0+4+2+5
No longer listed·601132225
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 8 funders, grant income rose $9k → $99k.

5 of 18 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 65% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $405k from 2 payers (the payer shares this organization's board, largest Episcopal Communities & Services for Seniors). These are real filings, and they are not money THE PASADENA VILLAGE raised.

From the IRS filings of THE PASADENA VILLAGE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 17 of 18 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

THE PASADENA VILLAGE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 33% of grant income and the top three 64%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

75% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund THE PASADENA VILLAGE.

33%
largest funder
64%
top three
~6
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 96% · 2018 56% · 2019 93% · 2020 46% · 2021 32% · 2022 47% · 2023 41% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

43% of THE PASADENA VILLAGE's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 50% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

65% of THE PASADENA VILLAGE's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $208k that is directly attributable, 68% of it comes from California funders.

MA
PA
CA
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $392k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like THE PASADENA VILLAGE

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

82% of spending goes to programs.

Program 82%Management 13%Fundraising 5%

Governance

18
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

99%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for THE PASADENA VILLAGE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds THE PASADENA VILLAGE?
THE PASADENA VILLAGE (California) receives grants from 18 organizations whose IRS filings report $600,152 to it, the largest being Pasadena Community Foundation ($200,900). 9 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 65% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does THE PASADENA VILLAGE have?
IRS filings report 18 organizations giving $600,152 in grants to THE PASADENA VILLAGE, 9 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of THE PASADENA VILLAGE?
Pasadena Community Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $200,900 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like THE PASADENA VILLAGE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Pasadena Village →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 18 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing