· Private foundation
Lockhart Vaughan Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $12k
- $10k–50k55 grants · $1.4M
- $50k–250k21 grants · $1.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PARK SCHOOL OF BALTIMORE INC | $176,522 |
| EARTHJUSTICE | $75,000 |
| ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND | $75,000 |
| THREAD INC | $75,000 |
| WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION | $75,000 |
| TEACH FOR AMERICA - BALTIMORE | $60,000 |
| ARCHDIOCESE OF BALTIMORE | $60,000 |
| BLUE WATER BALTIMORE | $50,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $50,000 |
| CENTER FOR CLIMATE CHANGE COMMUNICATION | $50,000 |
| CHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND BALTIMORE | $50,000 |
| ST JAMES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC | $50,000 |
| CRISTO REY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL | $50,000 |
| CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| STRONG SCHOOLS MARYLAND | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $380k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 9% of Lockhart Vaughan Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.
118 repeat relationships — 60 still active in FY2025, 58 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $706k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EPENOCH PRATT FREE LIBRARY OF BALTIMORE CITY9× · 2017–2025 · $527k · revenue +37%
CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC9× · 2017–2025 · $448k · revenue +53%- KBKIPP BALTIMORE INC9× · 2017–2025 · $436k · revenue +44%
Funded once
- WDWell Done Foundation Incgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue +187%
- HUHELPING UP MISSION INCone grant, 2018 · $85k · revenue -36%
- EEARTHJUSTICEone grant, 2024 · $75k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To cultivate career advancement opportunities for local talent, facilitate talent acquisition for local employers, increase access to capital for local entrepreneurs' social ventures, and foster cross-sector collaboration to address city…
Greater Baybrook Alliance GBA is a non-profit community development organization whose mission is to act as a catalyst and conduit for equitable development and reinvestment in the Brooklyn, Brooklyn Park, Curtis Bay neighborhoods and…
Baltimore Action Legal Team is dedicated to pursuing creative, community-driven solutions and movement-oriented lawyering to support the Baltimore community.
Greater Baltimore Committee, Inc. is a not-for-profit, civic-interest corporation comprised of business and professional organizations located within the Greater Baltimore Area. Its purpose is to provide a strong, unified and effective…
The maryland center on economic policy advances innovative policy ideas to foster broad prosperity and help our state be the standard-bearer for responsible public policy.
The council was organized for the purpose of providing its members with adequate representation in various union related matters.
Baltimore children & youth fund stewards public funds to support children and youth in baltimore city. the fund awards grants to community-based, youth-serving organizations and provides capacity-building and technical assistance to…
Baltimore hunger project removes the barriers to learning by providing food and resources to children facing food insecurity in our community.
Baltimore Green Space is a land trust that partners with communities to preserve and support community gardens , forest patches , pocket parks , and other community-managed spaces.
The baltimore regional housing partnership expands housing choices for low-income families who have historically been excluded from housing in well-resourced areas.
The baltimore educational scholarship trust, in partnership with our seventeen independent member schools, recruits and supports through the admissions process academically ambitious, african american students with financial need from the…
To advocate fair housing and improving tenant/landlord relations.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Maryland Association of Non-Profit Organizations and the most unlike its peers is Nature Sacred. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
129 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 129 of the 202 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ENOCH PRATT FREE LIBRARY OF BALTIMORE CITY ↗
- Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND BALTIMORE ↗
- Who funds CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds KIPP BALTIMORE INC ↗
- Who funds BLUE WATER BALTIMORE ↗
- Who funds THREAD INC ↗
- Who funds THE LITERACY LAB ↗
- Who funds WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION ↗
- Who funds CITY TEACHING ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds CALVERT SCHOOL INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds THE JEMICY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds The Ingenuity Project Inc ↗
- Who funds COLLEGEBOUND FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ST PAUL'S SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC ↗
- Who funds THE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds BALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds Building Science Technology and Education Partnerships Inc ↗
- Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
- Who funds BRIDGES BALTIMORE INC ↗
- Who funds BALTIMORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE PARK SCHOOL OF BALTIMORE INC ↗
- Who funds NEXT ONE UP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE VILLAGE LEARNING PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds BALTIMORE TREE TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗
- Who funds THE DERRYFIELD SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Maryland Alliance of Public Charter Schools Inc ↗
- Who funds THE MODERN CLASSROOMS PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds BALTIMORE SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · The Abell Foundation Inc · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · Clayton Baker Trust · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · The Morris Goldseker Foundation of Maryland Inc · T Rowe Price Foundation · Fund for Educational Excellence Inc · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Lockhart Vaughan Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Baltimore Tree Trust Inc — 100% of income from government
- Upton Planning Committee Inc — 100% of income from government
- Maryland Alliance of Public Charter Schools Inc — 100% of income from government
- St James Development Corporation Inc — 100% of income from government
- Open Works Inc — 96% of income from government
- Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution — 63% of income from government
- Central Baltimore Partnership Inc — 46% of income from government
- Parks and People Inc — 43% of income from government
- St Vincent De Paul of Baltimore Inc — 40% of income from government
- Save the Sound — 37% of income from government
- Southeast Community Development Corporation Inc — 35% of income from government
- The Baltimore Children's Museum Inc — 33% of income from government
- Baltimore Community Lending Inc — 28% of income from government
- Maryland Association of Non-Profit Organizations — 27% of income from government
- First Fruits Farm Inc — 26% of income from government
- Arts Education in Maryland Schools Alliance Inc — 23% of income from government
- Enterprise Community Partners Inc — 22% of income from government
- The House of Ruth Maryland Inc — 19% of income from government
- Turnaround Inc — 18% of income from government
- Jubilee Baltimore Inc — 16% of income from government
- Everyman Theatre Inc — 15% of income from government
- Neighborhood Design Center Inc — 14% of income from government
- Garwyn Oaks Northwest Housing Resource Center Inc — 13% of income from government
- Thread Inc — 12% of income from government
- The Maryland Food Bank Inc — 11% of income from government
- Baltimore Symphony Orchestra Inc — 11% of income from government
- Parity Baltimore Incorporated — 11% of income from government
- Casa Inc — 8% of income from government
- 4MyCity Inc — 7% of income from government
- Connecticut Farmland Trust Inc — 7% of income from government
- Helping Up Mission Inc — 6% of income from government
- The Village Learning Place Inc — 6% of income from government
- Rebuild Metro Inc — 5% of income from government
- Arts Every Day Inc — 4% of income from government
- Fusion Partnership Inc — 3% of income from government
- Wide Angle Youth Media Inc — 3% of income from government
- Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Waterfront Partnership of Baltimore Inc — 2% of income from government
- Health Care for the Homeless Inc — 2% of income from government
- Fund for Educational Excellence Inc — 1% of income from government
- Arts for Learning Maryland Inc — 1% of income from government
- National Aquarium Inc — 1% of income from government
- University of Maryland Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Lockhart Vaughan Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Lockhart Vaughan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.