· Private foundation
Sempra Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1478 grants · $971k
- $10k–50k15 grants · $290k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $560k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SOLAR ELECTRIC LIGHT FUND | $100,000 |
| STATE CENTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| GALVESTON BAY FOUNDATION | $75,000 |
| ENGINEERS WITHOUT BORDERS USA | $75,000 |
| THE ACTUARIAL FOUNDATION | $60,000 |
| VICTORY INSTITUTE | $50,000 |
| MONARCH SCHOOL | $50,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $50,000 |
| UNITED WAY INC | $32,683 |
| UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO | $26,865 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS - NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS | $25,000 |
| HEALING WITH HORSEPLAY INC | $25,000 |
| EQUALITY CALIFORNIA - HEADQUARTERS | $25,000 |
| TEAM RUBICON | $25,000 |
| THE OLD GLOBE | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.
1402 repeat relationships — 767 still active in FY2024, 635 since wound down; 66 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $413k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches6× · 2019–2024 · $238k · revenue +39%
- MSMONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT6× · 2019–2024 · $213k · revenue +46%
- LJLA JOLLA COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL5× · 2019–2023 · $212k · revenue +42%
Funded once
- GAGRID ALTERNATIVESone grant, 2021 · $578k
- OCONCOR CARES FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $500k · revenue -54%
- DFDALLAS FOUNDATION A TX NONPROFIT CORPORATIONone grant, 2021 · $200k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Promoting k-12 public education success through aggressive advocacy and effective school board governance.
To promote community investment in public education to ensure equity and access to an innovative, world-class education that inspires confidence, competence, and creativity in every student in the Santa Barbara Unified School District.
The University of California Student Association (UCSA) is a coalition of students and student governments that aims to provide a collective voice for all students through advocacy and direct action. UCSA participates in the shared…
California forward (ca fwd) brings people together across regions to improve government and create resilient growth statewide.
To educate students of diverse backgrounds in areas of fine arts, architecture, design, & writing.
Independent, co-educational, college preparatory high school located in san rafael, california.
The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.
Advance ca life sciences ecosystem by advocating public policies & supporting businesses.
To provide a superior, student-centered learning experience integrating liberal arts and professional education and preparing individuals for lasting achievement and responsible leadership in their careers and communities.
Supporting learning and collaboration between california's school districts and their partners to improve student success.
Transform schools to revolutionize school systems to empower all students with a high-quality education.
The league of california community foundations promotes and strengthens community foundations in california. through collaboration and shared learning among member foundations and building partnerships with private and public entities, we…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is International Guiding Eyes Inc and the most unlike its peers is Uss Midway Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
1476 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1476 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SOLAR ELECTRIC LIGHT FUND ↗
- Who funds ONCOR CARES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds MONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT ↗
- Who funds LA JOLLA COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds United Way of Greater Houston ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds THE SONORAN INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST LOUISIANA ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTHWEST LOUISIANA ↗
- Who funds FRANCIS PARKER SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds SERVING SENIORS ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds JACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds FEEDING SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds FEEDING TEXAS ↗
- Who funds STATE CENTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LGBTQ Victory Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds LA JOLLA MUSIC SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds VOICES FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds THE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TULSA AREA UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds Texas Children's Hospital ↗
- Who funds ENGINEERS WITHOUT BORDERS-USAINC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHEAST TEXAS EMERGENCY RELIEF FD ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: David C Copley Foundation · Walter J & Betty C Zable Foundation · The Parker Foundation · Price Philanthropies Foundation · The Conrad Prebys Foundation · The Cushman Foundation · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · Sempra Employee Giving Network · French Fund Samuel Katherine Tua · Samuel I & John Henry Fox Foundation · Pratt Memorial Fund · Boys and Girls Aid Society of San Diego Ltd
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Sempra Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Sempra Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Sempra Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.