· Private foundation
The Parker Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $16k
- $10k–50k64 grants · $1.4M
- $50k–250k7 grants · $390k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SAN DIEGO TIJUANA WORLD DESIGN CAPITAL 2024 | $90,000 |
| CATALYST OF SAN DIEGO AND IMPERIAL COUNTIES | $50,000 |
| OCEAN DISCOVERY INSTITUTE | $50,000 |
| VIETNAM VETERANS OF SAN DIEGO | $50,000 |
| SERVING SENIORS | $50,000 |
| JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY | $50,000 |
| NORTH COUNTY HEALTH PROJECT INC | $50,000 |
| ANGELS FOSTER FAMILY NETWORK | $45,000 |
| THE MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO | $40,000 |
| SUPPORT THE ENLISTED PROJECT | $40,000 |
| THINK DIGNITY | $40,000 |
| VICTIM OFFENDER RECONCILIATION PROGRAM INC | $40,000 |
| NEW VILLAGE ARTS | $35,000 |
| NATIONAL CONFLICT RESOLUTION CENTER | $35,000 |
| COMMUNITY HOUSINGWORKS | $35,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.
37 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 57 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.5M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Catalyst of San Diego & Imperial Counties3× · 2021–2024 · $195k · revenue +12%- MTMission Trails Regional Park Foundation Inc2× · 2023–2024 · $100k · revenue +507%
- SDSAN DIEGO MUSEUM OF MAN DBA MUSEUM OF US3× · 2021–2024 · $90k · revenue +24%
Funded once
- PFPARTNERSHIP FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF NEW AMERICANSone grant, 2023 · $150k · revenue -74%
- TSTHE SAN DIEGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -11%
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWESTone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +3%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.
Acquire, manage and protect land in perpetuity that supports sensitive habitats and species, and to educate and inspire people and communities as stewards and advocates of their natural environment.
The Labor Council offers an avenue for local unions to come together as one group.
To spark breakthrough community action that elevates every child and family toward a brighter future.
San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.
San Diego Theatres, Inc. (SDTI) is a not-for-profit public benefit corporation established to manage and operate publicly owned performing arts theatres. SDTI was established in 2003 by the San Diego Convention Center Corporation (SDCCC),…
The san diego municipal employees association (sdmea) is dedicated to being a strong and effective advocate for san diego city employees. sdmea is united to improve employees' standard of living and promote their fair treatment by…
San Diego Junior Theatre (Junior Theatre) was incorporated in 1948 as a nonprofit corporation and is the oldest youth theatre in the nation, offering affordable camps, classes, and outreach programs for children ages 3-18; as well as six…
To increase, preserve and improve quality affordable housing opportunities for working families.
Promote Access to Health Care for all San Diegans
To support and cultivate sustainable employment opportunities for San Diego County residents contributing to a prosperous local economy.
The mission of the san diego county bar association is to be the representative of the san diego county legal profession, serving the prblic and the profession by enhancing the legal system and promoting justice, professional excellence,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Diego Opera Association and the most unlike its peers is Mohuman. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
211 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 211 of the 224 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Catalyst of San Diego & Imperial Counties ↗
- Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF NEW AMERICANS ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HOUSING WORKS ↗
- Who funds Mission Trails Regional Park Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds THE SAN DIEGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO TIJUANA WORLD DESIGN CAPITAL 2024 ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO MUSEUM OF MAN DBA MUSEUM OF US ↗
- Who funds RANCHO SANTA FE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Rise Up Industries ↗
- Who funds UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO HOUSING FEDERATION ↗
- Who funds THE ESCONDIDO CREEK CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds Diamond Educational Excellence Partnership ↗
- Who funds NEW VILLAGE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds CHICANO FEDERATION OF SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF OCEANSIDE INC ↗
- Who funds SCRIPPS HEALTH ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO FISHERMENS WORKING GROUP ↗
- Who funds THE PUTNAM FOUNDATION DBA TIMKEN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds SOMALI FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds MISSION EDGE SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds VOICE OF SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds STARPAL ↗
- Who funds HOME START INC ↗
- Who funds VOICES FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds Mingei International Inc ↗
- Who funds KITCHENS FOR GOOD ↗
- Who funds Realize Impact ↗
- Who funds VAPA Foundation ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA CENTER FOR THE ARTS ESCONDIDO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OCEAN DISCOVERY INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds NORTH COUNTY HEALTH PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds MOHUMAN ↗
- Who funds INVESTIGATIVE NEWSOURCE ↗
- Who funds PROJECT NEW VILLAGE ↗
- Who funds VIETNAM VETERANS OF SAN DIEGO DBA VETERANS VILLAGE OF SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds KIM CENTER FOR SOCIAL BALANCE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Conrad Prebys Foundation · The San Diego Foundation · Price Philanthropies Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · David C Copley Foundation · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · The Cushman Foundation · The Nordson Corporation Foundation · Samuel I & John Henry Fox Foundation · Pratt Memorial Fund · Walter J & Betty C Zable Foundation · Sempra Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Parker Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Parker Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Parker Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.