· Private foundation
Walter J & Betty C Zable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k60 grants · $1.3M
- $50k–250k14 grants · $1.1M
- $250k+2 grants · $3.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SUPPORT THE ENLISTED PROJECT (STEP) | $3,100,000 |
| ARMED SERVICES YMCA AT CAMP PENDLETON | $250,000 |
| OUTDOOR OUTREACH | $150,000 |
| FREE TO THRIVE | $150,000 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SD | $125,000 |
| CENTER FOR COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS | $100,000 |
| CASA DE AMPARO | $100,000 |
| MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF SD | $75,000 |
| NATIONAL FOOTBALL FOUNDATION AND COLLEGE HALL OF FAME INC | $60,000 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SD COUNTY INC | $50,000 |
| JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY | $50,000 |
| PRO KIDS GOLF ACADEMY INC | $50,000 |
| FEEDING AMERICA SAN DIEGO | $50,000 |
| CRISIS HOUSE | $50,000 |
| SAN DIEGO PARKS FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $6.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
158 repeat relationships — 70 still active in FY2025, 88 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $130k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- STSUPPORT THE ENLISTED PROJECT INC9× · 2017–2025 · $4.4M · revenue +343% · 41% of their budget
- TITERI Inc3× · 2019–2024 · $2.5M · revenue +60%
- NCNORTH COUNTY LIFELINE INC DBA LIFELINE COMMUNITY SERVICES7× · 2017–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +93%
Funded once
- SDSAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITYone grant, 2017 · $200k
- JAJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENTone grant, 2017 · $100k
- TPTHRIVE PUBLIC SCHOOLone grant, 2018 · $75k · revenue -82%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.
San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.
To spark breakthrough community action that elevates every child and family toward a brighter future.
To establish San Diego and Southern California as the core of the healthy living, sports and active lifestyle community. Through supporting companies at all stages, we help create jobs, but not just any jobs, jobs that make our city and…
To support the social, recreational, cultural and education programs and facilities, both on campus and in the community, and to advocate for student interests, provide leadership opportunities and participate in shared governance.
The mission of the san diego cooperative preschool is to provide the highest quality care, while creating a nurturing and supportive community of children, parents, and highly skilled staff. through a play-based program that attends to the…
Acquire, manage and protect land in perpetuity that supports sensitive habitats and species, and to educate and inspire people and communities as stewards and advocates of their natural environment.
To prepare young people to make ethical and moral choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the Scout Oath and Law.
The Labor Council offers an avenue for local unions to come together as one group.
The mission of the san diego county bar association is to be the representative of the san diego county legal profession, serving the prblic and the profession by enhancing the legal system and promoting justice, professional excellence,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Diego Center for Children and the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
178 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 178 of the 222 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SUPPORT THE ENLISTED PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds TERI Inc ↗
- Who funds THE CAMPANILE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTH COUNTY LIFELINE INC DBA LIFELINE COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds JUST IN TIME FOR FOSTER YOUTH ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO OASIS ↗
- Who funds OCEAN DISCOVERY INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds VOICES FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITH SHELTER NETWORK OF SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds MONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT ↗
- Who funds OUTDOOR OUTREACH ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SAN MARCOS ↗
- Who funds PROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO BLOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL ADVOCATES FOR YOUTH SAN DIEGO INC ↗
- Who funds PRO KIDS GOLF ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds CRISIS HOUSE ↗
- Who funds FREE TO THRIVE ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Casa De Amparo ↗
- Who funds SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds HUNTINGTON'S DISEASE SOCIETY OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF VISTA HILL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PROJECT CONCERN INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds San Diego Parks Foundation ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds FOREVER BALBOA PARK ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF VISTA INC ↗
- Who funds ELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: David C Copley Foundation · The Conrad Prebys Foundation · The San Diego Foundation · Price Philanthropies Foundation · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · The Cushman Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · The Nordson Corporation Foundation · The Parker Foundation · Pratt Memorial Fund · Sempra Foundation · Samuel I & John Henry Fox Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Walter J & Betty C Zable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Walter J & Betty C Zable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Walter J & Betty C Zable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.