· Public charity
Chc Creating Healthier Communities
We envision a world where every person in every community has an opportunity to live their healthiest life.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 186 grants below total $12,210,954 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $13,544,703 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,333,749 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k73 grants · $519k
- $10k–50k74 grants · $1.6M
- $50k–250k33 grants · $3.5M
- $250k+6 grants · $6.6M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL | $3,659,720 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERSMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA | $1,118,049 |
| AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY | $562,864 |
| SAMARITAN'S PURSE | $496,371 |
| ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION | $437,988 |
| HEALTHY MOTHERS HEALTHY BABIES COALITION OF GEORGIA | $345,527 |
| HENRY FORD HEALTH | $243,782 |
| AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION | $228,573 |
| THE CENTER FOR BLACK WOMEN'S WELLNESS | $175,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN | $159,629 |
| BIRTHING BEAUTIFUL COMMUNITIES | $156,341 |
| LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY | $156,186 |
| SUSAN G KOMEN | $147,249 |
| NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY | $140,080 |
| AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION | $134,107 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
363 repeat relationships — 161 still active in FY2025, 202 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $213k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC8× · 2017–2025 · $37M · revenue +145%- ADALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC8× · 2017–2025 · $5.8M · revenue +40%
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC4× · 2022–2025 · $3.5M · revenue +13%
Funded once
- CCCHC CREATING HEALTHIER COMMUNITIESone grant, 2019 · $256k · revenue -23%
- ALAmerican Lung Association Of The Upper Midwestone grant, 2017 · $50k
- LFLupus Foundation of America DC DCMDVA Chapterone grant, 2017 · $29k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.
To define and advance quality, effective, equitable, and accessible cancer care and prevention so all people can live better lives.
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
As a leading charitable foundation and healthcare advocacy organization, the pan foundation is dedicated to accelerating access to treatment for those who need it most and empowering patients on their healthcare journeys. we provide…
Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.
Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.
Advancing science, education, and careers to improve neurologic health for all.
Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…
To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.
Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.
Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…
Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Health Care Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Washington Home Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
467 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 467 of the 559 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds AUTISM SPEAKS INC ↗
- Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
- Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds HEALTHY MOTHERS HEALTHY BABIES COALITION OF GA INC ↗
- Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN ↗
- Who funds ZERO PROSTATE CANCER ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds LUPUS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds BIRTHING BEAUTIFUL COMMUNITIES ↗
- Who funds HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
- Who funds ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
- Who funds NAMI National ↗
- Who funds Sickle Cell Disease Association of America Inc ↗
- Who funds National Kidney Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR BLACK WOMEN'S WELLNESS CBWW INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC ↗
- Who funds EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR AIDS RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Chc Creating Healthier Communities Local · Christian Service Charities Inc · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Assn · Pohlad Family Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Ronald McDonald House Global · Caring Connection · Schlessman Foundation Inc · Assurant Foundation · The Jamf Nation Global Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Chc Creating Healthier Communities funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Special Olympics Connecticut Inc — 42% of income from government
- Epilepsy Foundation of America — 22% of income from government
- United Way of Coastal and Western Connecticut Inc — 11% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood of Southern New England Inc — 10% of income from government
- Survival Centers Inc — 9% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood of Maryland Inc — 0% of income from government
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.