· Private foundation
Xcel Energy Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1554 grants · $1.8M
- $10k–50k259 grants · $4.1M
- $50k–250k4 grants · $241k
- $250k+3 grants · $1.6M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY | $619,552 |
| MILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC | $529,417 |
| THE UNITED WAY INC | $496,117 |
| WEST TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $70,886 |
| UNITED WAY OF PUEBLO COUNTY COLORADO INC | $60,355 |
| LUBBOCK AREA UNITED WAY INC | $59,216 |
| COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE | $51,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF THE GREATER CHIPPEWA VALLEY INC | $48,417 |
| WRIGHT COUNTY AREA UNITED WAY | $44,680 |
| UNITED WAY OF GOODHUE WABASHA & PIERCE COUNTIES | $40,971 |
| SHERBURNE COUNTY AREA UNITED WAY | $40,577 |
| UNITED WAY OF HASTINGS | $35,592 |
| UNITED WAY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY EAST INC | $32,298 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION | $32,076 |
| THE GREENWAY FOUNDATION INC | $30,510 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $2.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
1591 repeat relationships — 1052 still active in FY2024, 539 since wound down; 74 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $267k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
MILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC6× · 2019–2024 · $3.7M · revenue +52%- TUTHE UNITED WAY INC6× · 2019–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +1%
- UWUnited Way of Pueblo County Colorado Inc6× · 2019–2024 · $388k · revenue +3%
Funded once
- VSVIBRANT & SAFE DOWNTOWNone grant, 2021 · $250k · revenue -49%
- SPST PAUL HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOLone grant, 2021 · $150k
- MCMINNEAPOLIS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $150k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans.
Invest in nonprofits, programs, collaborations that equip, empower and create opportunities for all to thrive.
Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.
Advance public policy & job growth strategies to create an environment for businesses to prosper
Offer a challenging education that develops the qualities of mind, spirit and body for students.
Empowering people of all abilities to reach their full potential.
Be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state & the best place to practice
Led by minnesota state university students, we are the inclusive voice for all future, current, and former students. we actively work to represent and support minnesota state university students and advocate at a system, local, state, and…
Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.
Embolden creative leaders to transform society through equity, empathy, & imagination.
Enhancing and strengthening our community and our regional core.
Provides access to quality civil legal services to as many people in colorado as possible.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Central Minnesota and the most unlike its peers is 58 hoops. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
1547 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1547 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds MILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNITED WAY INC ↗
- Who funds COLORADO RESTAURANT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds United Way of Pueblo County Colorado Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GOODHUEWABASHA & PIERCE COUNTIES ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE GREATER CHIPPEWA VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds WRIGHT COUNTY AREA UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds AMARILLO AREA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY-EAST ↗
- Who funds VIBRANT & SAFE DOWNTOWN ↗
- Who funds Metropolitan Economic Development Association ↗
- Who funds United Way of Hastings ↗
- Who funds LUBBOCK AREA UNITED WAY INC ↗
- Who funds SHERBURNE COUNTY AREA UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MINNESOTA ↗
- Who funds WEST TEXAS A&M UNIV FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF MN AND WI RIVER VALLEYS INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY ST CROIX AND RED CEDAR VALLEYS INC ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE SERVING PEOPLE CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF WELD COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC ↗
- Who funds THE PARK PEOPLE ↗
- Who funds Children's Theatre Company and School ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEERS FOR OUTDOOR COLORADO ↗
- Who funds COLORADO ENTERPRISE FUND ↗
- Who funds MINNDEPENDENT ↗
- Who funds ORDWAY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF METRO DENVER ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTH ↗
- Who funds PLAINVIEW COMMUNITY CHEST INC FORMERLY PLAINVIEW AREA UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds HAWKQUEST ↗
- Who funds The Cookie Cart ↗
- Who funds The Greenway Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Colorado Museum of Natural History ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Hardenbergh Foundation · The Hubbard Broadcasting Foundation · Fred C and Katherine B Andersen Foundation · Fr Bigelow Foundation · Schlessman Foundation Inc · The Jamf Nation Global Foundation · Pohlad Family Foundation · Andersen Corporate Foundation · Target Foundation · Hugh J Andersen Foundation · The K Foundation · The Janus Henderson Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Xcel Energy Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.