How much did Chc Creating Healthier Communities Local grant in FY2025?

Chc Creating Healthier Communities Local reported 22 itemized grants totaling $729,700, out of $982,904 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing.

Where is Chc Creating Healthier Communities Local based?

Chc Creating Healthier Communities Local is based in VA.

Chc Creating Healthier Communities Local

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Public charity

Chc Creating Healthier Communities Local

We envision a world where every person in every community has an opportunity to live their healthiest life.

$983k

Granted FY2025still arriving

Grants FY2025still arriving

States reached

$389k

Largest

01What you fund

0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2025.

Health$9.0MHuman Services$221kFood & Nutrition$43kPhilanthropy$24kRecreation & Sports$12kEducation$7kOther$672k

02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 22 grants below total $729,700 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $982,904 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $253,204 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k9 grants · $61k
$10k–50k11 grants · $217k
$50k–250k1 grant · $62k
$250k+1 grant · $389k

$11,784

Median grant

States reached

$1.1M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL	$389,466
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY	$61,926
SUSAN G KOMEN	$34,046
PLANNED PARENTHOOD MARYLAND	$31,614
GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK	$30,756
CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION	$29,044
BREAKTHROUGH T1D LOCAL PAYEE ACCOUNT	$17,316
CITY OF HOPE	$14,875
ATLANTA MISSION	$12,997
DENVER RESCUE MISSION	$12,831
THE ACTION CENTER	$11,784
TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN	$11,757
NORTHERN VIRGINIA MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION	$10,070
MOVEABLE FEAST	$8,610
HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION	$8,396

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $221k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$9.4M · 55 repeat orgs$631k to everyone else

55 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 37 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$9.4M

$583k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%

+23%

Still filing today

96%

57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $48k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionEducationPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
7× · 2018–2025 · $4.6M · revenue +125%
AD
ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
2× · 2018–2019 · $324k · revenue +32%
BT
BREAKTHROUGH T1D
6× · 2018–2025 · $316k · revenue +31%

Funded once

SMILE TRAIN INCgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $29k · revenue +26%
CR
CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC
one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue -15%
AL
AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION
one grant, 2019 · $24k · revenue +5%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health

Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health

Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education

The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—

American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement

New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health

Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health

Critical Path Institute

The critical path institute is a catalyst in the development of new approaches that advance medical innovation and regulatory science. this is achieved by leading teams that share data, knowledge and expertise resulting in sound, consensus…

Health

The N 1 Collaborative Inc

To make individualized medicines routinely and rapidly accessible to rare disease patients worldwide.

Health

The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Parkinson's Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Washington Home Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 48 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/120

the rest of the field

13%

240,396/1,819,445

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

95 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 95 of the 120 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

92/95

Grantees still filing

66/95

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Health$9,031,894Other$671,958Human Services$220,527Food & Nutrition$43,140Philanthropy$24,417Recreation & Sports$11,967Education$6,689

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Chc Creating Healthier CommunitiesVA102× affinity48 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Chc Creating Healthier Communities · McKesson Foundation Inc · Carmax Foundation · Assurant Foundation · America's Charities · Ronald McDonald House Global · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Assn · Ge Aerospace Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · The Fraternal Order of Eagles Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Chc Creating Healthier Communities Local funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

9get no government money at all

17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home

State money flows

the interactive map of money crossing state lines