· Public charity
Christian Service Charities Inc
The mission of christian service charities (csc) is to glorify god by facilitating the inclusion of "christian charities you know and trust" in charitable giving opportunities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2021.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2021
- Under $10k9 grants · $62k
- $10k–50k23 grants · $556k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $456k
- $250k+1 grant · $433k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SAMARITAN'S PURSE | $432,597 |
| FOCUS ON THE FAMILY | $147,376 |
| VOICE OF THE MARTYRS | $108,275 |
| CHC CREATING HEALTHIER COMMUNITIES | $97,456 |
| INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION | $51,620 |
| MERCY SHIPS | $51,609 |
| CHILDREN'S HUNGER RELIEF FUND | $48,336 |
| AMERICAN FAMILY ASSOCIATION | $42,850 |
| ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM | $39,756 |
| OUR DAILY BREAD MINISTRIES | $38,846 |
| PRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES | $30,556 |
| OFFICERS' CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP | $29,933 |
| MISSION AVIATION FELLOWSHIP | $28,664 |
| THE NAVIGATORS | $27,202 |
| AMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY | $26,848 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–21, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against -10% for the ones you funded once.
34 repeat relationships — 34 still active in FY2021, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2021, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $109k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SPSAMARITAN'S PURSE2× · 2019–2021 · $996k · revenue +151%
- IJINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION2× · 2019–2021 · $130k · revenue +75%
Mercy Ships International2× · 2019–2021 · $108k · revenue +170%
Funded once
- WBWYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS INCone grant, 2019 · $68k
- OBOperation Blessing International Relief and Development Corporationone grant, 2019 · $34k · revenue -33%
- BGBILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2019 · $22k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…
Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.
The organization is dedicated to reaching people for christ through an international network of christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,(continued on…
As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.
World christian broadcasting exists so that people in places best served by broadcast media become aware of the good news of jesus christ and want to know more. geographic areas that cannot be easily served by missionaries are a priority.
Serving and pastoring overseas workers on their own turf and equipping nationals by training and empowering them in their work of advancing the gospel.
Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…
Leveraging technology to invite all people to know jesus christ as savior and grow in a personal relationship with him.
To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…
International missions: this organization is an international mission agency focusing on leadership development through teaching of the scriptures
To get the good news to every nation this generation by showing and sharing god's love by providing opportunities and supporting christian missionaries in over fifty seven countries around the world.
Christian freedom international (cfi) aids, equips, and advocates for persecuted christians who are oppressed or persecuted for their faith. cfi provides spiritual and physical help for suffering christians to live in the dignity of god's…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Water Missions International and the most unlike its peers is World Emergency Relief. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION ↗
- Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
- Who funds CHC CREATING HEALTHIER COMMUNITIES ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FAMILY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM ↗
- Who funds RBC MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds OFFICERS CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP OF THE UNITED ↗
- Who funds PRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds NAZARENE COMPASSIONATE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds WORLD EMERGENCY RELIEF ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN MILITARY FELLOWSHIP ↗
- Who funds Care Net ↗
- Who funds KIDS FOR THE KINGDOM INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds Operation Blessing International Relief and Development Corporation ↗
- Who funds WATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds FOOD FOR THE HUNGRY INC ↗
- Who funds HOME SCHOOL LEGAL DEFENSE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds The New Horizons Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds THE SOCIETY OF ST ANDREW INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHRISTIAN RELIEF FUND ↗
- Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds Unbound ↗
- Who funds The Moody Bible Institute of Chicago ↗
- Who funds CADENCE INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds ENGINEERING MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL USA ↗
- Who funds LIFELINE GLOBAL MINISTRIES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Chc Creating Healthier Communities · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · Neighbor to Nation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Shell USA Company Foundation · Greater Horizons · Barnabas Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Christian Service Charities Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Christian Service Charities Inc?
Find your warmest path to Christian Service Charities Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.