Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Labcorp Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$2.3M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.

Health$2.6MCommunity Improvement$2.5MPublic Safety & Disaster$1.6MInternational$997kEducation$830kPhilanthropy$567kHuman Services$534kFood & Nutrition$305kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,326,117
Median grant
1
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BLACKBAUD GIVING FUND FOR CORPORATE GRANTS$2,326,117
BLACKBAUD GIVING FUND FOR CSR$331,531
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JEREMIAHS INN INC: $5k → 11%ISLAND HARVEST LTD: $5k → 7%WEST END COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $6k → 14%HEALTHSOURCE FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%HELP OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $10k → 13%HEALTHSOURCE FOUNDATION: $20k → 9%HELP OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $10k → 13%HEALTHSOURCE FOUNDATION: $20k → 9%HELP OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $10k → 13%QL PLUS PROGRAM: $15k → 6%HELP OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $10k → 13%CENTROMED: $24k → 16%QL PLUS PROGRAM: $15k → 6%CENTROMED: $8k → 16%THE INN BETWEEN: $10k → 8%RAY OF HOPE CANCER FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%CENTROMED: $8k → 16%ASPIRE AFTERSCHOOL LEARNING: $6k → 7%CENTROMED: $8k → 16%PROJECT HOME: $10k → 22%CENTROMED: $8k → 16%PINKY SWEAR FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%PROJECT HOME: $10k → 22%CENTROMED: $8k → 16%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $271k → 14%VERA COURT NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC: $10k → 10%PINKY SWEAR FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%PROJECT HOME: $10k → 22%CENTROMED: $8k → 16%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $228k → 14%PROJECT HOME: $10k → 22%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $25k → 17%CENTROMED: $8k → 16%AVALON-CARVER COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 14%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $25k → 17%CENTROMED: $8k → 16%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE: $25k → 17%CENTROMED: $8k → 16%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $5k → 17%DRESS FOR SUCCESS TRIANGLE NC: $10k → 8%NOTE IN THE POCKET: $10k → 8%IGNITEORG: $10k → 14%NOTE IN THE POCKET: $10k → 8%IGNITE ORG: $10k → 14%NOTE IN THE POCKET INC: $10k → 8%THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE TRIANGLE AREA: $10k → 8%YMCA OF THE TRIANGLE: $10k → 8%SOUTHERN ALAMANCE FAMILY EMPOWERMENT INC: $14k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of The Labcorp Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The Labcorp Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.3% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.6M · 265 repeat orgs$4.9M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +11% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.

265 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2025, 265 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

265
624

Total granted

$5.6M
$2.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+1%

Still filing today

83%
74%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyFood & NutritionInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $909k · revenue +3%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    2× · 2023–2024 · $500k · revenue +22%
  • American Diabetes Association
    4× · 2021–2024 · $101k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • LC
    LEGACY COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $120k · revenue +73%
  • HA
    HEALTHY AMERICAS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -87%
  • EC
    EL CENTRO DEL BARRIO INC
    one grant, 2021 · $96k · revenue +15%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

—
2
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
3
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
4
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
5
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
6
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
8
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
9
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
11
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
12
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mile High United Way Inc and the most unlike its peers is LitShop. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsFood Banks and PantriesUnited Way AffiliatesCancer Support ServicesMilitary Veterans SupportCommunity College Foundatio…Addiction Recovery ServicesYouth Mentoring ProgramsDance Arts OrganizationsLocal History MuseumsElementary Literacy TutoringChristian Missionary Organi…Developmental Disabilities …Affordable Housing Construc…Pregnancy Support ServicesSenior Support ServicesEnvironmental Conservation …Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Public Library OperationsSchool Parent OrganizationsCommunity Food PantriesSchool District FoundationsYouth Development CentersDomestic Violence ServicesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Animal Rescue and ShelterIndependent K-12 SchoolsYouth Sports ProgramsAffordable Housing Developm…Community FoundationsHealth Access Advocacy and …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr16%23%20–35yr13%27%35–55yr16%27%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr16%38%20–35yr13%21%35–55yr16%27%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.1%1/765
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,818,800

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

701 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 701 of the 906 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
56
Early backer (in before they grew)
698/701
Grantees still filing
395/701
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BLACKBAUD GIVING FUND FOR CORPORATE GRANTS — $2,326,117 · OtherBLACKBAUD GIVING FUND FOR CORPORATE GRANTSAMERICAN RED CROSS — $1,051,395 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSBLACKBAUD GIVING FUND FOR CSR — $331,531 · OtherBLACKBAUD GIVING FUND FOR CSR+73 more — $1,413,491 · Other+73 moreCAPITAL HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC — $150,000 · HealthCAPITAL HEALTH SYS…LEGACY COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC — $120,000 · HealthLEGACY COMMUNITY H…American Diabetes Association — $101,104 · HealthAmerican Diabetes …HEALTHY AMERICAS FOUNDATION — $100,000 · HealthHEALTHY AMERICAS F…American Heart Association Inc — $88,921 · HealthAmerican Heart Ass…National Kidney Foundation Inc — $65,100 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $57,681 · Health+53 more — $928,422 · Health+53 moreAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $500,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Nat…EL CENTRO DEL BARRIO INC — $96,000 · Human ServicesEL CENTRO DE…NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC — $86,467 · Human ServicesNATIONAL URB…The HealthSource Foundation — $50,000 · Human ServicesHELP OF SOUTHERN NEVADA — $40,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT HOME — $40,000 · Human Services+19 more — $258,505 · Human Services+19 morePROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $908,670 · InternationalPROJECT HO…+1 more — $20,000 · InternationalDONORSCHOOSEORG — $100,225 · EducationUNCG EXCELLENCE FOUNDATION INC — $41,090 · EducationThe Foundation for Tomorrow Inc — $40,000 · EducationNeeds Beyond Medicine — $31,500 · EducationBEACON HILL PREPARATORY INSTITUTE — $27,500 · EducationMEDICAL COLLEGE OF VA FOUNDATION — $25,000 · EducationCenter for Science Technology and Leadership Development Inc — $25,000 · EducationLitShop — $20,000 · EducationOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $20,000 · EducationARIZONA TECHNOLOGY COUNCIL FOUNDATION — $20,000 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $20,000 · Education+12 more — $112,214 · EducationALAMANCE COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION — $162,000 · Community ImprovementOPERATION HOMEFRONT INC — $15,000 · Community ImprovementALAMANCE DREAM CENTER INC — $11,000 · Community ImprovementNorth Carolina Economic Development Association Foundation — $10,000 · Community ImprovementARCAP COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC AGENCY INC — $10,000 · Community ImprovementFOOD CONNECT CO — $70,000 · Food & NutritionALAMANCE COUNTY MEALS ON WHEELS INC — $54,137 · Food & NutritionMOUNTAINEER FOOD BANK INC — $20,000 · Food & NutritionFEEDING SAN DIEGO — $10,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC — $10,000 · Food & NutritionFundamental Needs Inc — $10,000 · Food & NutritionBrighter Bites Inc — $10,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC — $10,000 · Food & NutritionFREESTORE FOODBANK INC — $10,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$5,122,534Health$1,611,228Human Services$1,070,972International$928,670Education$482,529Community Improvement$208,000Food & Nutrition$204,137

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $908,670 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $500,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALAMANCE COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION — $162,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetCAPITAL HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC — $150,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF ALAMANCE COUNTY — $130,531 over 4y, 5.6% of budgetLEGACY COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC — $120,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association — $101,104 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG — $100,225 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTHY AMERICAS FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetEL CENTRO DEL BARRIO INC — $96,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $88,921 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC — $86,467 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMethodist Richardson Medical Center Foundation — $83,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetNMDP FOUNDATION — $75,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFOOD CONNECT CO — $70,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetNational Kidney Foundation Inc — $65,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAlamance Community College Foundation — $63,925 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $57,681 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALAMANCE COUNTY MEALS ON WHEELS INC — $54,137 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetThe HealthSource Foundation — $50,000 over 3y, 6.1% of budgetIDSA EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ICLA DA SILVA FOUNDATION INC — $45,000 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetZERO PROSTATE CANCER — $45,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $42,827 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNCG EXCELLENCE FOUNDATION INC — $41,090 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHELP OF SOUTHERN NEVADA — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Foundation for Tomorrow Inc — $40,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetPROJECT HOME — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHEALING TRANSITIONS INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF DANE COUNTY INC — $36,047 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNeeds Beyond Medicine — $31,500 over 3y, 8.8% of budgetDELAWARE BREAST CANCER COALITION INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCenter for Excellence in Education — $30,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPROJECT SERVE — $30,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetNOTE IN THE POCKET INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL OVARIAN CANCER COALITION INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPROVIDENCE INLAND NORTHWEST FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE — $27,619 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBEACON HILL PREPARATORY INSTITUTE — $27,500 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN CONNECTIONS INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetImmersion for Spanish Language Acq — $25,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetMEDICAL COLLEGE OF VA FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR WOMEN'S CANCER — $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCenter for Science Technology and Leadership Development Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetAIDS Services Foundation Orange County — $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ronald McDonald House…Community Foundation …Reynolds American Fou…Truist Foundation IncThe Winston-Salem Fou…The Leon Levine Found…Lincoln Financial Fou…Corning Incorporated …Moses H Cone Memorial…The Cannon Foundation…Child's PlayTriangle Community Fo…
Ronald McDonald House GlobalIL50.3× affinity25 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ronald McDonald House Global · Community Foundation of Greater Greensboro Inc · Reynolds American Foundation · Truist Foundation Inc · The Winston-Salem Foundation · The Leon Levine Foundation · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Corning Incorporated Foundation · Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital Operating Corporation · The Cannon Foundation Inc · Child's Play · Triangle Community Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Labcorp Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Genesis Community Health Inc — 62% of income from government
  • Open Sky Community Services Inc — 48% of income from government
  • Liberty Science Center — 14% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
  • Delaware Breast Cancer Coalition Inc — 7% of income from government
  • The Pepin Academies Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Jeremiah's Inn Inc — 2% of income from government
  • The Arc of Prince George's County Inc — 2% of income from government
  • St Francis Hospital Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Rutgers University Foundation — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
57report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Labcorp Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Labcorp Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 906 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines