· Public charity
Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital Operating Corporation
We serve our communities by preventing illness, restoring health and providing comfort, through exceptional people delivering exceptional care.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 54% of MOSES H CONE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OPERATING CORPORATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 5 grants below total $89,300 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $186,607 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $97,307 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $9k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $81k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GREENSBORO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM | $25,000 |
| THE CONFERENCE BOARD INC | $25,000 |
| BETTER HEALTH MD LLC | $20,300 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY | $10,500 |
| UNITED WAY OF GREATER GREENSBORO INC | $8,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $630k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.
46 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 43 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GAGREENSBORO AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC5× · 2019–2023 · $782k · revenue +25%
- PTPIEDMONT TRIAD CHARITABLE FOUNDATION D/B/A WYNDHAM CHAMPIONSHIP3× · 2021–2023 · $675k · revenue +43%
- ACAlamance Community College Foundation4× · 2017–2023 · $468k · revenue +3%
Funded once
- HMHEALTH MANAGEMENT ACADEMY INCone grant, 2023 · $113k
- GCGREENSBORO CHAMBER FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $105k · revenue +27%
- PFPARTNERS FOR INNOVATION IN HEALTH CARE INCone grant, 2020 · $55k · 100% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To build a thriving regional economy, enhance the community's quality of life, and strengthen member businesses.
The mission of the north carolina global health alliance is to advance north carolina as an international center for research, training, education, advocacy and business dedicated to improving the health of the world's communities. we…
The north carolina biotechnology center aids the biotechnology-related efforts of researchers, businesses, state and federal governments, and other agencies primarily through awards of grants and loans related to specific programs and…
The research triangle regional partnership is an association of area economic development agencies dedicated to keeping the research triangle region economically strong by collectively marketing the region's competitive advantages and…
The carolinas gateway partnership is dedicated to the creation of community wealth through the retention, creation, and expansion of business opportunities in tarboro, rocky mount, and edgecombe county, north carolina.
Promoting and enhancing the economic growth and development of greenville county south carolina; gadc was formed by greenville county council.
The Yadkin Valley Chamber of Commerce is an organization that promotes a positive business environment, community betterment and supports economic development
Our mission is to improve the economic well-being and quality of life for all north carolinians. we do this by collaborating with state, regional, local, and private-sector partners in new business recruitment, existing employer support,…
To organize members of the medical profession to advance medical science.
To educate, advocate, and innovate for a better healthcare delivery system in nc.
The durham chamber is a member-driven organization that serves its members by helping to create and sustain a healthy economic climate for the durham community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greensboro Housing Coalition Inc and the most unlike its peers is Piedmont Triad Charitable Foundation D/B/a Wyndham Championship. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
66 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 66 of the 85 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GREENSBORO AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC ↗
- Who funds PIEDMONT TRIAD CHARITABLE FOUNDATION D/B/A WYNDHAM CHAMPIONSHIP ↗
- Who funds Alamance Community College Foundation ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds Elon University ↗
- Who funds NCHA INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER GREENSBORO INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SUPPORT NETWORK OF CENTRAL CAROLINA ↗
- Who funds THE NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER OF GREENSBORO INC DBA GREENSBORO SCIENCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds GREENSBORO MEDICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GREENSBORO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds PIEDMONT TRIAD PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Greensboro Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF ALAMANCE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds GREENSBORO HOUSING COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds AUTHORACARE COLLECTIVE ↗
- Who funds READY FOR SCHOOL READY FOR LIFE ↗
- Who funds GREENSBORO CHAMBER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER GREENSBORO INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED ARTS COUNCIL OF GREENSBORO INC ↗
- Who funds ALAMANCE COUNTY AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH CAROLINA FOR COMMUNITY AND JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds Free Clinic of Rockingham County Inc ↗
- Who funds READING CONNECTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS FOR INNOVATION IN HEALTH CARE INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER HIGH POINT INC ↗
- Who funds ZERO PROSTATE CANCER ↗
- Who funds THE SERVANT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ALAMANCE COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FIGURE SKATING ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER GREENSBORO INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Greensboro Inc · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Hillsdale Fund · The Joseph M Bryan Foundation · Weaver Foundation Inc · The Cemala Foundation Inc · Moses Cone - Wesley Long Community Health Foundation · Tannenbaum-Sternberger Foundation Inc · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · Louis DeJoy & Aldona Z Wos Family Foundation Inc · The Edward M Armfield Sr Foundation I · United Way of Greater Greensboro Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital Operating Corporation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.