Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

National Council on Aging Inc

Ncoa is the national voice for every person's right to age well.

$46M
Granted FY2025still arriving
190
Grants FY2025still arriving
46
States reached
$13M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0176% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.

Human Services$102MCommunity Improvement$100MHealth$15MEducation$12MArts & Culture$8.7MPhilanthropy$7.7MHousing & Shelter$7.7MEmployment$4.6MFood & Nutrition$4.2MOther$89M
02FY2025 · 190 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k36 grants · $853k
  • $50k–250k135 grants · $15M
  • $250k+17 grants · $31M
$90,000
Median grant
46
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PATHSTONE$12,623,637
THE LEGACY LINK$4,455,221
FELTON INSTITUTE$1,933,658
SOUTHWESTERN COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC-52 AND 78$1,890,392
THE SKILLSOURCE GROUP INC$1,435,412
NORTHERN KENTUCKY COMMUNITY ACTION COMMISSION$1,369,353
SER JOBS FOR PROGRESS INC$1,243,519
NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT FOR THE AGING$1,180,079
WORKFORCE ESSENTIALS INC$1,174,970
CRISPUS ATTUCKS ASSOCIATION$765,498
LUZERNEWYOMING AAA (74)$477,035
REGION VIII PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL-56 AND 83$465,250
BIG SANDY AREA COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC$453,167
ADVANCING STATES$444,219
MEXICAN AMERICAN OPPORTUNITY FOUNDATION$339,999
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $99.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF IDAHO INC: $209k → 11%ST JOHN'S LUTHERAN MINISTRIES: $200k → 9%LuzemeWyoming AAA: $569k → 15%FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF SAN MATEO COUNTY: $1.3M → 7%NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR HISPANIC HEALTH: $2.2M → 14%AREA AGENCY ON AGING OF PALM BEACH TREASURE COAST INC: $195k → 11%Central West Virginia Aging Services Inc: $373k → 19%THE LEGACY LINK: $4.9M → 12%SOUTHWESTERN COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC-52 AND 78: $2.0M → 19%ADVANCING STATES: $506k → 7%CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF NORTHERN NEVADA: $330k → 10%LUZEMEWYOMING AAA: $524k → 15%FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF SAN MATEO COUNTY: $1.2M → 7%THE LEGACY LINK: $4.8M → 12%SOUTHWESTERN COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC-52 AND 78: $1.9M → 19%ADVANCING STATES: $444k → 7%LUZEMEWYOMING AAA: $521k → 15%FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF SAN MATEO COUNTY: $1.2M → 7%THE LEGACY LINK: $4.6M → 12%SOUTHWESTERN COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC-52 AND 78: $1.9M → 19%ADVANCING STATES: $205k → 7%LUZEMEWYOMING AAA: $518k → 15%Family Service Agency of San Mateo County: $1.2M → 7%THE LEGACY LINK: $4.5M → 12%SOUTHWESTERN COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC-52 AND 78: $1.9M → 19%LUZERNEWYOMING AAA: $489k → 15%FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF SAN MATEO COUNTY: $1.2M → 7%THE LEGACY LINK: $4.5M → 12%SOUTHWESTERN COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC-52 AND 78: $1.9M → 19%LUZERNEWYOMING AAA (74): $477k → 15%FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF SAN MATEO COUNTY: $1.2M → 7%THE LEGACY LINK: $4.4M → 12%SOUTHWESTERN COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC: $1.8M → 19%LUZEMEWYOMING AAA: $457k → 15%FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF SAN MATEO COUNTY: $1.2M → 7%THE LEGACY LINK: $4.3M → 12%SOUTHWESTERN COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC: $1.8M → 19%LUZEMEWYOMING AAA: $428k → 15%FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF SAN MATEO COUNTY: $1.1M → 7%THE LEGACY LINK: $4.3M → 12%SOUTHWESTERN COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC-52: $1.7M → 19%LUZEMEWYOMING AAA: $422k → 15%The Legacy Link: $2.3M → 12%Southwestern Community Action Council Inc: $899k → 19%ASIAN SERVICES IN ACTION: $500k → 17%Southwestern Community Action Council Inc - KY: $225k → 19%CHINESE INFORMATION & SERVICES CENTER: $265k → 9%AGEOPTIONS: $198k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$345M · 386 repeat orgs$5.2M to everyone else

386 repeat relationships — 149 still active in FY2025, 237 since wound down; 41 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

386
83

Total granted

$345M
$2.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+23%

Still filing today

79%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionEducationCommunity ImprovementCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    PATHSTONE CORPORATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $98M · revenue +43% · 33% of their budget
  • TL
    THE LEGACY LINK INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $39M · revenue +77% · 37% of their budget
  • SC
    SOUTHWESTERN COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $16M · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA - MONROE
    one grant, 2017 · $330k
  • BP
    BOAT PEOPLE S O S INC
    one grant, 2023 · $125k · revenue -16%
  • NA
    Nathan Adelson Hospice Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $125k · revenue -8%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ageguide Northeastern Illinois Area On Aging

We strive to make aging easier through the development of a network of services for older persons designed to optimize the quality of their lives.

Food & Nutrition
2
Community Care Health Plan Inc

Community care health plan's mission is to develop and demonstrate innovative, flexible, community-based approaches to care for at-risk adults, in order to optimize their quality of life and optimize the allocation of community resources.

Health
3
District Iii Area Agency On Aging

Care Connection provides opportunities to create positive aging experience.

Human Services
4
Senior Adult Services

Yo provide services to senior adults that improve their quality of life and prevent premature institutionalization through good nutrition, health screening and socialization.

Human Services
5
Senior Community Services Inc

To promote independent and meaningful living for older adults through direct services and programs in the home and community.

Human Services
6
Area Agency On Aging of Western Michigan Inc

Through internal expertise, external partnerships, and advocacy, the area agency on aging of western michigan provides older adults, adults with disabilities, and their caregivers equitable access to services that promote independence and…

Human Services
7
Christian Care Communities Inc Group Return

Christian care communities enhances the journey of life for those we serve. recognizing the unique needs of each individual christian care offers an array of housing and care options including independent living. 24-hour skilled nursing…

Human Services
8
Springwell Inc

Springwell helps individuals improve their quality of life and reduce their need for residential care by helping them access community resources. springwell works with individuals directly as well as with government agencies, health…

Human Services
9
Area 1 Agency On Aging

Area 1 agency on aging provides leadership and services that support and promote healthy aging.

Human Services
10
Western Connecticut Area Agency On Aging Inc

The western connecticut area agency on aging, inc. (wcaaa) develops, manages and provides comprehensive services through person centered planning for seniors, caregivers and individuals with disabilities in order to maintain their…

Human Services
11
National Investment Center for Seniors Housing & Care Inc

To enable the access and choice of america's seniors in their housing and care by providing data, analytics and connections that bring together investors and providers in the sector.

Human Services
12
Central Minnesota Council On Aging Inc

The central minnesota council on aging is committed to maintaining the highest level of independence with older people by developing and coordinating community care, reducing isolation and improving access to services.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pathlights Human Services and the most unlike its peers is Thomas Jefferson University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadySenior Support ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Immigrant Worker SupportCommunity FoundationsPolicy Research and AdvocacyAffordable Housing Developm…Lgbtq+ Community SupportWomen & Girls Leadership De…Local Food System Organizat…Addiction Recovery ServicesYmca Youth DevelopmentJewish Community Organizati…Affordable Housing Construc…Cancer Support ServicesUnited Way AffiliatesFood Banks and PantriesCommunity College Foundatio…Developmental Disabilities …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr13%44%35–55yr16%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%2%10–20yr16%23%20–35yr13%50%35–55yr16%24%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.4%2/510
the rest of the field
13%
240,394/1,819,055

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

392 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 392 of the 511 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

15
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
55
Early backer (in before they grew)
384/392
Grantees still filing
281/392
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PATHSTONE CORPORATION — $97,595,759 · Community ImprovementPATHSTONE CORPORATION+4 more — $2,129,266 · Community ImprovementTHE LEGACY LINK INC — $38,527,882 · Human ServicesTHE LEGACY LINK INCSOUTHWESTERN COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC — $16,103,162 · Human ServicesSOUTHWESTERN COMMUNITY ACTION CO…PENINSULA FAMILY SERVICE — $9,567,633 · Human ServicesPENINSULA FAMILY SERVICEGREATER WILKES BARRE ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND D/B/A NORTHEAST SIGHT SERVICES — $4,404,908 · Human Services+57 more — $26,474,007 · Human Services+57 moreNorthern Kentucky Community Action Commission Inc — $11,968,880 · OtherNorthern Kentucky Community Acti…AGING IN NEW YORK FUND INC — $10,784,108 · OtherAGING IN NEW YORK FUND INCFelton Institute — $9,609,112 · OtherFelton InstituteREGION VIII PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL-56 — $5,398,105 · OtherREGION VIII PLANNING & DEVELOPME…BIG SANDY AREA COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC — $4,163,721 · OtherCRISPUS ATTUCKS ASSOCIATION OF YORK PA — $6,326,277 · OtherCRISPUS ATTUCKS ASSOCIATION OF Y…+90 more — $46,411,977 · Other+90 moreMEDICARE RIGHTS CENTER INC — $1,185,542 · HealthALIVIO MEDICAL CENTER INC — $832,950 · HealthTHRIVE ALLEN COUNTY INC — $775,961 · HealthMILLCREEK MANOR — $760,470 · HealthFAMILY HEALTH CENTERS OF SAN DIEGO INC — $637,500 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF SE KANSAS INC — $563,902 · HealthWNC Health Network Inc — $530,492 · HealthLITTLE RIVER MEDICAL CENTER INC — $497,500 · HealthFUND FOR PUBLIC HEALTH IN NEW YORK INC — $494,713 · HealthPARTNERS IN CARE FOUNDATION — $487,500 · HealthPROJECT VISION HAWAII — $454,471 · HealthIMMUNIZE NEVADA — $448,310 · HealthTRI-VALLEY INC — $401,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH CLINICS INC — $395,000 · Health+11 more — $2,752,739 · HealthWESTMORELAND COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $7,354,121 · EducationBENEFITS DATA TRUST — $1,530,500 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITY — $683,001 · EducationAGE US — $419,784 · Education+5 more — $1,165,691 · EducationSER-Jobs for Progress Inc San Joaquin Valley — $8,342,148 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $150,000 · Arts & CultureTHE SKILLSOURCE GROUP INC — $7,035,275 · PhilanthropySouthern Alabama Area Health Education C — $496,022 · Philanthropy
Community Improvement$99,725,025Human Services$95,077,592Other$94,662,180Health$11,218,050Education$11,153,097Arts & Culture$8,492,148Philanthropy$7,531,297

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPATHSTONE CORPORATION — $97,595,759 over 9y, 33% of budgetTHE LEGACY LINK INC — $38,527,882 over 9y, 37% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC — $16,103,162 over 9y, 13% of budgetNorthern Kentucky Community Action Commission Inc — $11,968,880 over 9y, 11% of budgetFelton Institute — $9,609,112 over 9y, 5.5% of budgetPENINSULA FAMILY SERVICE — $9,567,633 over 8y, 10% of budgetSER-Jobs for Progress Inc San Joaquin Valley — $8,342,148 over 7y, 22% of budgetWESTMORELAND COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $7,354,121 over 8y, 98% of budgetTHE SKILLSOURCE GROUP INC — $7,035,275 over 6y, 18% of budgetCRISPUS ATTUCKS ASSOCIATION OF YORK PA — $6,326,277 over 9y, 12% of budgetGREATER WILKES BARRE ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND D/B/A NORTHEAST SIGHT SERVICES — $4,404,908 over 9y, 98% of budgetBIG SANDY AREA COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC — $4,163,721 over 9y, 3.1% of budgetSoutheast Chicago Chamber of Commerce — $2,649,999 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetWORKFORCE ESSENTIALS INC — $2,343,936 over 2y, 13% of budgetTHE NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR HISPANIC HEALTH — $2,318,873 over 2y, 34% of budgetADvancing States Inc — $1,704,958 over 8y, 5.7% of budgetSOUTH CAROLINA ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIPS — $1,542,656 over 2y, 15% of budgetCatholic Charities of Northern Nevada — $1,538,529 over 9y, 3.4% of budgetBENEFITS DATA TRUST — $1,530,500 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetMexican American Opportunity Foundation — $1,319,981 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetMISSOURI ASSOCIATION OF AREA AGENCIES ON AGING — $1,276,000 over 9y, 14% of budgetASIAN SERVICES IN ACTION INC — $1,254,694 over 9y, 6.9% of budgetFeeding the Gulf Coast — $1,214,500 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetMEDICARE RIGHTS CENTER INC — $1,185,542 over 9y, 5.9% of budgetChinese Information and Service Center — $1,139,584 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetCENTER FOR POPULAR DEMOCRACY INC — $1,124,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetAGEOPTIONS INC (FKA SUBURBAN AREA AGENCY ON AGING) — $916,035 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetELDER LAW OF MICHIGAN — $897,500 over 8y, 12% of budgetSOUTH ALABAMA REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION — $893,000 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetAREA AGENCY ON AGING OF PALM BEACH TREASURE COAST INC — $867,500 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetHOPES COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP — $856,892 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetALIVIO MEDICAL CENTER INC — $832,950 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetUSAGING — $821,747 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetKOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC — $820,250 over 8y, 5.7% of budgetTHRIVE ALLEN COUNTY INC — $775,961 over 2y, 11% of budgetATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC — $775,571 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMILLCREEK MANOR — $760,470 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetCHINATOWN SERVICE CENTER — $749,999 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetNational Asian Pacific Center on Aging — $732,900 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetADELANTE DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC — $721,500 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetCENTER FOR INDEPENDENCE OF THE DISABLED IN NEW YORK INC — $715,035 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetCATHOLIC FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $686,339 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetUNITED CAMBODIAN COMMUNITY INC — $685,535 over 9y, 15% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $683,001 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNorthern Kentucky Legal Aid Society — $681,500 over 9y, 2.5% of budgetPennsylvania Pharmacists Association — $656,860 over 3y, 20% of budgetSENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER DALLAS INC — $646,500 over 7y, 3.0% of budgetFAMILY HEALTH CENTERS OF SAN DIEGO INC — $637,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PATHSTONE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE LEGACY LINK INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWESTERN COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds Northern Kentucky Community Action Commission Inc ↗
  • Who funds AGING IN NEW YORK FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Felton Institute ↗
  • Who funds PENINSULA FAMILY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds SER-Jobs for Progress Inc San Joaquin Valley ↗
  • Who funds WESTMORELAND COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SKILLSOURCE GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds CRISPUS ATTUCKS ASSOCIATION OF YORK PA ↗
  • Who funds GREATER WILKES BARRE ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND D/B/A NORTHEAST SIGHT SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds BIG SANDY AREA COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds Southeast Chicago Chamber of Commerce ↗
  • Who funds WORKFORCE ESSENTIALS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR HISPANIC HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds ADvancing States Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH CAROLINA ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIPS ↗
  • Who funds Catholic Charities of Northern Nevada ↗
  • Who funds BENEFITS DATA TRUST ↗
  • Who funds Mexican American Opportunity Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI ASSOCIATION OF AREA AGENCIES ON AGING ↗
  • Who funds ASIAN SERVICES IN ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding the Gulf Coast ↗
  • Who funds MEDICARE RIGHTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Chinese Information and Service Center ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR POPULAR DEMOCRACY INC ↗
  • Who funds AGEOPTIONS INC (FKA SUBURBAN AREA AGENCY ON AGING) ↗
  • Who funds ELDER LAW OF MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH ALABAMA REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION ↗
  • Who funds AREA AGENCY ON AGING OF PALM BEACH TREASURE COAST INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPES COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds ALIVIO MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds USAGING ↗
  • Who funds KOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC ↗
  • Who funds THRIVE ALLEN COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds MILLCREEK MANOR ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

UsagingAARP FoundationMeals on Wheels Ameri…National Foundation f…Scan Health PlanCommunity Catalyst IncAARPNextfifty InitiativeArchstone FoundationDirect ReliefNational Coalition fo…Unidosus
UsagingDC79.9× affinity45 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Usaging · AARP Foundation · Meals on Wheels America · National Foundation for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Inc · Scan Health Plan · Community Catalyst Inc · AARP · Nextfifty Initiative · Archstone Foundation · Direct Relief · National Coalition for Asian Pacific American Community Development · Unidosus

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization National Council on Aging Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Tri-Valley Inc — 68% of income from government
  • Hopes Community Action Partnership — 47% of income from government
  • The Childrens Home Society of New Jersey — 43% of income from government
  • Community Health Connections Inc — 32% of income from government
  • Cumacecho Inc — 25% of income from government
  • Washington County Commission On Aging Inc/Area Agency On Aging — 19% of income from government
  • Connecticut Community Care Inc — 15% of income from government
  • Catholic Family and Community Services Inc — 13% of income from government
  • One Community Health — 13% of income from government
  • Age Us — 6% of income from government
  • Metropolitan Charities Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Treasure Coast Food Bank Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Catholic Charities Diocese of Trenton — 2% of income from government
  • The Arc of Prince George's County Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Area Agency On Aging of Palm Beach Treasure Coast Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Florida Health Sciences Center Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
70report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 511 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines