Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Unidosus

UNIDOSUS builds a stronger america by creating opportunities for latinos.

$22M
Granted FY2024still arriving
206
Grants FY2024still arriving
35
States reached
$1.5M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Human Services$22MHousing & Shelter$21MCommunity Improvement$20MHealth$13MEmployment$10MCivil Rights$9.2MEducation$5.6MYouth Development$3.4MOther$0
02FY2024 · 206 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 206 grants below total $21,891,102 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $22,417,371 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $526,269 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k82 grants · $2.3M
  • $50k–250k105 grants · $12M
  • $250k+15 grants · $7.7M
$64,200
Median grant
35
States reached
$140M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ONE STOP CAREER CENTER OF PUERTO RICO INC$1,535,932
URBAN LEAGUE OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY$817,540
MI CASA RESOURCE CENTER$663,636
MISSION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY$587,718
ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY HOUSING CORPORATION$557,459
NATIONAL COALITION FOR ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT$549,725
GREATER SACRAMENTO URBAN LEAGUE$517,100
SELF HELP ENTERPRISES$397,763
SPANISH COALITION FOR HOUSING$334,780
HOUSING AND EDUCATION ALLIANCE INC$315,379
EAST LA COMMUNITY CORPORATION$312,625
HISPANIC UNITY OF FLORIDA INC$282,949
EDEN COUNCIL FOR HOPE AND OPPORTUNITY$272,858
LATIN AMERICAN ASSOCIATION$271,527
COMMUNITY SERVICES OF NEVADA$270,660
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $29.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CENTRO FAMILIAR NUEVA ESPERANZA: $180k → 10%GREATER SACRAMENTO URBAN LEAGUE: $517k → 12%EL CONCILIO CALIFORNIA: $258k → 12%REDLANDS CHRISTIAN MIGRANT ASSOCIATION: $140k → 10%CENTRO HISPANO OF DANE COUNTY: $152k → 10%CONEXION AMERICAS: $170k → 14%LATIN AMERICAN ASSOCIATION: $272k → 13%EL CENTRO DE LA RAZA: $258k → 9%CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA: $320k → 11%GREATER SACRAMENTO URBAN LEAGUE: $209k → 12%CREDIT & HOMEOWNERSHIP EMPOWERMENT SERVICES INC: $214k → 15%CONEXION AMERICAS: $159k → 14%LATIN AMERICAN ASSOCIATION: $180k → 13%EL CENTRO DE LA RAZA: $254k → 9%Chicanos Por La Causa: $317k → 11%GREATER SACRAMENTO URBAN LEAGUE: $204k → 12%CREDIT & HOMEOWNERSHIP EMPOWERMENT SERVICES INC: $203k → 15%EL CENTRO DE LA RAZA: $216k → 9%CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA - PHOENIX: $314k → 11%EL CENTRO DE LA RAZA: $212k → 9%CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC: $230k → 11%THE CONCILIO DALLAS TX: $142k → 14%EL CENTRO DE LA RAZA: $183k → 9%CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC: $187k → 11%EL CENTRO DE LA RAZA: $152k → 9%CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC: $186k → 11%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE: $141k → 17%CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC: $185k → 11%CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC: $175k → 11%MI CASA RESOURCE CENTER: $715k → 12%MI CASA RESOURCE CENTER: $664k → 12%MEXICAN AMERICAN COUNCIL INC: $171k → 15%MEXICAN AMERICAN COUNCIL INC: $163k → 15%MEXICAN AMERICAN COUNCIL INC: $153k → 15%ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MEXICAN AMERICANS (AAMA): $200k → 16%HISPANIC SERVICES COUNCIL INC: $168k → 13%MEXICAN AMERICAN COUNCIL INC: $150k → 15%HISPANIC SERVICES COUNCIL INC: $147k → 13%HISPANIC SERVICES COUNCIL INC: $144k → 13%GADS HILL CENTER: $159k → 14%GADS HILL CENTER: $141k → 14%NORTHWEST SIDE HOUSING CENTER: $228k → 14%NORTHWEST SIDE HOUSING CENTER: $225k → 14%NORTHWEST SIDE HOUSING CENTER: $210k → 14%NORTHWEST SIDE HOUSING CENTER: $207k → 14%NORTHWEST SIDE HOUSING CENTER: $204k → 14%Northwest Side Housing Center: $193k → 14%PARA LOS NINOS: $159k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$105M · 257 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +61% since the first grant, against +52% for the ones you funded once.

257 repeat relationships — 181 still active in FY2024, 76 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

257
42

Total granted

$105M
$886k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+52%

Still filing today

93%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $907k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementHealthEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OS
    ONE STOP CAREER CENTER OF PR INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $4.3M · revenue +127% · 46% of their budget
  • ME
    MISSION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.8M · revenue +103%
  • UL
    Urban League of San Diego County
    4× · 2021–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +12% · 41% of their budget

Funded once

  • LA
    LATIN AMERICAN MONTESSORI BILINGUAL PUBLgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $66k · revenue +62%
  • CH
    Community Housing Resources of Arizona Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $66k
  • AI
    AVANCE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $60k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Centro Las Americas Inc

To create a fully-integrated multi-cultural, multi-linguistic health and human services delivery system, while developing long-term economic strength and sustainability.

Human Services
2
La Comunidad Inc

Legal, immigration and community organizing

—
3
La Oportunidad Inc

A mission of "championing the development of latino individuals and families to create a strong, peaceful community," through its holistic, culturally relevant programming by providing bilingual/bicultural human services.

—
4
Latino Political Network
—
5
Latino Union of Chicago

Latino Union works to defend the rights and dignity of contingent workers, including the right to immigrate, work, live free of oppression and violence, and provide for oneself and one's family.

Human Services
6
La Colaborativa Inc

Empower latinx immigrants to enhance the social and economic health of our community and people and to hold institutional decision makers accountable to the communities they serve.

Human Services
7
Latino Chamber of Commerce of Dane County Inc

Our mission is to maximize economic development and job creation though advocacy and programs that generate success and value for our Latino and Non-Latino business community.

Community Improvement
8
Puentes

Puentes mission is to be an innovator in the development of comprehensive, collaborative and culturally relativistic initiatives that seek to provide permanent, sustainable solutions through addressing root causes, disparities and…

—
9
Centro Hispano

To empower Latino and Utah families by providing equitable access to information, resources, and educational programs to advance and strengthen the community.

Human Services
10
Latino Community Development Center

Latino community development center promotes financial literacy, access to financial services, and economic development primarily for the low and moderate income population in north carolina.

Human Services
11
Latino Health Access

Partner with communities to bring health, equity and sustainable change through education, services, consciousness-raising and civic participation.

Human Services
12
Latino Media Collaborative

Latino Media Collaborative's mission is to leverage the power of Latino and community news media to impact policy, change narratives, and promote civic engagement, while also supporting advancement of the sector through capacity building,…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Congreso De Latinos Unidos Inc and the most unlike its peers is Lucky Shoals Community Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealth Access Advocacy and …Community FoundationsImmigrant Worker SupportCommunity College Foundatio…Youth Development ServicesSenior Support ServicesAffordable Housing Construc…Addiction Recovery ServicesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Youth Development CentersFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Independent K-12 SchoolsElementary Literacy TutoringDevelopmental Disabilities …Women & Girls Leadership De…Policy Research and AdvocacyAffordable Housing Developm…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%13%10–20yr16%31%20–35yr13%36%35–55yr16%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr16%35%20–35yr13%43%35–55yr16%15%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.9%3/324
the rest of the field
13%
240,393/1,819,241

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

301 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 301 of the 324 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

17
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
86
Early backer (in before they grew)
297/301
Grantees still filing
231/301
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC CPLC — $1,931,399 · Human ServicesCHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC CPLCMI CASA RESOURCE CENTER — $1,727,986 · Human ServicesMI CASA RESOURCE CENTERNORTHWEST SIDE HOUSING CENTER — $1,501,522 · Human ServicesEL CENTRO DE LA RAZA — $1,436,500 · Human ServicesGREATER SACRAMENTO URBAN LEAGUE — $1,025,975 · Human Services+56 more — $21,334,645 · Human Services+56 moreMISSION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY — $2,779,563 · OtherMISSION ECONOMIC DEVELOP…Urban League of San Diego County — $1,992,895 · OtherUrban League of San Dieg…HISPANIC UNITY OF FLORIDA INC — $1,650,644 · OtherHISPANIC UNITY OF FLORID…LAWRENCE COMMUNITYWORKS INC — $1,308,082 · OtherLAWRENCE COMMUNITYWORKS …ADMINISTRATION OF RESOURCES & CHOICES — $1,250,799 · OtherADMINISTRATION OF RESOUR…TEJANO CENTER FOR COMMUNITY CONCERNS INC — $1,030,926 · OtherNAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC — $941,639 · Other+38 more — $11,382,569 · Other+38 moreSPANISH COALITION FOR HOUSING — $2,125,102 · Housing & ShelterSPANISH COALITIO…The Resurrection Project — $1,282,292 · Housing & ShelterThe Resurrection…COMMUNITY SERVICES OF NEVADA — $1,166,016 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITY SERVIC…HOUSING & EDUCATION ALLIANCE INC — $1,102,038 · Housing & ShelterHOUSING & EDUCAT…Self-Help Enterprises — $1,095,811 · Housing & ShelterSelf-Help Enterp…EAST LA COMMUNITY CORPORATION — $1,090,190 · Housing & ShelterEAST LA COMMUNIT…ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY HOUSING CORP — $1,002,284 · Housing & ShelterORANGE COUNTY CO…NEW ECONOMICS FOR WOMEN — $976,292 · Housing & ShelterNEW ECONOMICS FO…MONTEBELLO HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $968,548 · Housing & ShelterMONTEBELLO HOUSI…CENTRO CAMPESINO FARMWORKER CENTER INC — $837,975 · Housing & ShelterCENTRO CAMPESINO…COALITION OF FLORIDA FARMWORKER ORGANIZATIONS INC — $543,590 · Housing & ShelterCORPORACION DESARROLLO ECONOMICO DE SALUD Y VIVIENDA — $516,775 · Housing & Shelter+10 more — $2,489,404 · Housing & Shelter+10 moreCONGRESO DE LATINOS UNIDOS INC — $1,389,717 · HealthCONGRESO DE L…LA MAESTRA FAMILY CLINIC INC — $1,190,468 · HealthLA MAESTRA FA…CLINICAS DE SALUD DEL PUEBLO INC — $901,431 · HealthCLINICAS DE S…THE LATINO ALZHEIMERS AND MEMORY DISORDERS ALLIANCE — $878,650 · HealthTHE LATINO AL…ALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION — $835,135 · HealthALTAMED HEALT…ALIVIO MEDICAL CENTER INC — $760,800 · HealthALIVIO MEDICA…SU CLINICA FAMILIAR INC — $698,510 · HealthSU CLINICA FA…PROJECT VIDA HEALTH CENTER — $653,395 · HealthPROJECT VIDA …SEA MAR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS — $627,874 · HealthLA CLINICA DEL PUEBLO INC — $567,845 · HealthCLINICA MSR OSCAR A ROMERO — $490,349 · HealthURBAN HEALTH PLAN INC — $414,119 · Health+9 more — $2,584,425 · Health+9 moreNational Coalition for Asian Pacific American Community Development — $1,747,763 · Community ImprovementNational Co…BRIGHTON PARK NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL — $1,238,700 · Community ImprovementBRIGHTON PA…CYPRESS HILLS LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $987,700 · Community ImprovementCYPRESS HIL…LATINO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $714,358 · Community ImprovementLATINO ECON…EL CENTRO INC — $677,825 · Community ImprovementEL CENTRO I…Homes on The Hill Community Development Corp — $618,947 · Community ImprovementHomes on Th…ST NICKS ALLIANCE CORPORATION — $468,700 · Community ImprovementEL PASO COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM PROJECT BRAVO INC — $458,707 · Community ImprovementSpanish American Committee — $451,305 · Community ImprovementFAITH IN ACTION NETWORK — $431,089 · Community ImprovementRACE FORWARD — $357,374 · Community Improvement+10 more — $1,963,716 · Community Improvement+10 moreONE STOP CAREER CENTER OF PR INC — $4,267,277 · EducationONE STOP …CENTRO DE AYUDA PARA LOS HISPANOS — $857,549 · EducationCENTRO DE…PODER — $730,498 · EducationPODEREDU-FUTURO — $430,759 · EducationPUENTE LEARNING CENTER — $399,499 · EducationSYNERGY ACADEMIES — $348,000 · EducationRESTORE EDUCATION INC — $321,972 · EducationEL SOL SCIENCE AND ARTS ACADEMY OF SANTA ANA — $313,203 · Education+8 more — $1,309,712 · Education+8 moreCENTER FOR TRAINING & CAREERS INC — $1,101,489 · EmploymentCOMMUNIDADES LATINAS UNIDAS EN SERVICO INC — $704,670 · EmploymentSER-JOBS FOR PROGRESS OF THE TEXAS GULF COAST INC — $663,422 · EmploymentBuilding Skills Partnership — $561,210 · EmploymentMexican American Opportunity Foundation — $333,440 · EmploymentNueva Esperanza Inc — $278,622 · EmploymentTHE GROW GROUP INC — $241,800 · EmploymentGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $212,600 · EmploymentSHIRLINGTON EMPLOYMENT AND EDUCATION CENTER INC — $206,249 · Employment+5 more — $556,133 · Employment
Human Services$28,958,027Other$22,337,117Housing & Shelter$15,196,317Health$11,992,718Community Improvement$10,116,184Education$8,978,469Employment$4,859,635

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetONE STOP CAREER CENTER OF PR INC — $4,267,277 over 8y, 46% of budgetMISSION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY — $2,779,563 over 8y, 3.7% of budgetSPANISH COALITION FOR HOUSING — $2,125,102 over 8y, 16% of budgetUrban League of San Diego County — $1,992,895 over 4y, 41% of budgetCHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC CPLC — $1,931,399 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetNational Coalition for Asian Pacific American Community Development — $1,747,763 over 4y, 8.4% of budgetMI CASA RESOURCE CENTER — $1,727,986 over 7y, 22% of budgetHISPANIC UNITY OF FLORIDA INC — $1,650,644 over 8y, 4.6% of budgetNORTHWEST SIDE HOUSING CENTER — $1,501,522 over 8y, 14% of budgetEL CENTRO DE LA RAZA — $1,436,500 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetCONGRESO DE LATINOS UNIDOS INC — $1,389,717 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetLAWRENCE COMMUNITYWORKS INC — $1,308,082 over 8y, 4.2% of budgetThe Resurrection Project — $1,282,292 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetADMINISTRATION OF RESOURCES & CHOICES — $1,250,799 over 8y, 26% of budgetBRIGHTON PARK NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL — $1,238,700 over 8y, 4.7% of budgetLA MAESTRA FAMILY CLINIC INC — $1,190,468 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVICES OF NEVADA — $1,166,016 over 8y, 67% of budgetHOUSING & EDUCATION ALLIANCE INC — $1,102,038 over 8y, 35% of budgetCENTER FOR TRAINING & CAREERS INC — $1,101,489 over 7y, 11% of budgetSelf-Help Enterprises — $1,095,811 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetEAST LA COMMUNITY CORPORATION — $1,090,190 over 8y, 4.7% of budgetTEJANO CENTER FOR COMMUNITY CONCERNS INC — $1,030,926 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetGREATER SACRAMENTO URBAN LEAGUE — $1,025,975 over 4y, 9.9% of budgetORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY HOUSING CORP — $1,002,284 over 5y, 7.8% of budgetCYPRESS HILLS LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $987,700 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetNEW ECONOMICS FOR WOMEN — $976,292 over 8y, 2.9% of budgetMONTEBELLO HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $968,548 over 8y, 57% of budgetNAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC — $941,639 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetHISPANIC SERVICES COUNCIL INC — $907,195 over 8y, 9.5% of budgetCLINICAS DE SALUD DEL PUEBLO INC — $901,431 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetTHE LATINO ALZHEIMERS AND MEMORY DISORDERS ALLIANCE — $878,650 over 8y, 27% of budgetCENTRO DE AYUDA PARA LOS HISPANOS — $857,549 over 8y, 39% of budgetCONEXION AMERICAS — $839,912 over 8y, 6.9% of budgetCENTRO CAMPESINO FARMWORKER CENTER INC — $837,975 over 8y, 4.7% of budgetALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION — $835,135 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMexican American Council Inc — $815,954 over 8y, 14% of budgetTHE CONCILIO — $773,224 over 8y, 5.4% of budgetALIVIO MEDICAL CENTER INC — $760,800 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetGADS HILL CENTER — $747,750 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetVISIONARY HOME BUILDERS OF CALIFORNIA INC — $743,250 over 8y, 4.9% of budgetLATIN AMERICAN ASSOCIATION — $739,860 over 6y, 4.1% of budgetPODER — $730,498 over 8y, 13% of budgetYOUTH POLICY INSTITUTE INC — $717,903 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetLATINO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $714,358 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetCOMMUNIDADES LATINAS UNIDAS EN SERVICO INC — $704,670 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetSU CLINICA FAMILIAR INC — $698,510 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetCREDIT & HOMEOWNERSHIP EMPOWERMENT SERVICES — $694,972 over 8y, 7.1% of budgetCENTRO HISPANO INC — $683,498 over 8y, 3.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ONE STOP CAREER CENTER OF PR INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY ↗
  • Who funds SPANISH COALITION FOR HOUSING ↗
  • Who funds Urban League of San Diego County ↗
  • Who funds CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC CPLC ↗
  • Who funds National Coalition for Asian Pacific American Community Development ↗
  • Who funds MI CASA RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HISPANIC UNITY OF FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST SIDE HOUSING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds EL CENTRO DE LA RAZA ↗
  • Who funds CONGRESO DE LATINOS UNIDOS INC ↗
  • Who funds LAWRENCE COMMUNITYWORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Resurrection Project ↗
  • Who funds ADMINISTRATION OF RESOURCES & CHOICES ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHTON PARK NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds LA MAESTRA FAMILY CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SERVICES OF NEVADA ↗
  • Who funds HOUSING & EDUCATION ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR TRAINING & CAREERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Self-Help Enterprises ↗
  • Who funds EAST LA COMMUNITY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds TEJANO CENTER FOR COMMUNITY CONCERNS INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER SACRAMENTO URBAN LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY HOUSING CORP ↗
  • Who funds CYPRESS HILLS LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds NEW ECONOMICS FOR WOMEN ↗
  • Who funds MONTEBELLO HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds NAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds HISPANIC SERVICES COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds CLINICAS DE SALUD DEL PUEBLO INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LATINO ALZHEIMERS AND MEMORY DISORDERS ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds CENTRO DE AYUDA PARA LOS HISPANOS ↗
  • Who funds CONEXION AMERICAS ↗
  • Who funds CENTRO CAMPESINO FARMWORKER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Mexican American Council Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE CONCILIO ↗
  • Who funds ALIVIO MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GADS HILL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds VISIONARY HOME BUILDERS OF CALIFORNIA INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hispanic Federation I…National Association …Hispanics in Philanth…Raza Development Fund…Wells Fargo FoundationCatholic Legal Immigr…Naleo Educational FundEnterprise Community …Immigrant Legal Resou…Weingart FoundationUnited Way of Metropo…The California Endowm…
Hispanic Federation IncNY83.1× affinity61 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hispanic Federation Inc · National Association for Latino Community Asset Builders · Hispanics in Philanthropy · Raza Development Fund Inc · Wells Fargo Foundation · Catholic Legal Immigration Network Inc · Naleo Educational Fund · Enterprise Community Partners Inc · Immigrant Legal Resource Center · Weingart Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · The California Endowment

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Unidosus funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Redlands Christian Migrant Association Inc — 51% of income from government
  • Hacienda Community Development Corporation — 48% of income from government
  • Latin American Community Center Inc — 34% of income from government
  • Adelante Mujeres — 31% of income from government
  • Latino Network — 15% of income from government
  • Sociedad Latina Inc — 15% of income from government
  • Corvallis Neighborhood Housing Services Inc — 11% of income from government
  • Lawrence Communityworks Inc — 9% of income from government
  • Bienestar Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Coalition of Florida Farmworker Organizations Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Hispanic Unity of Florida Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Opa-Locka Community Development Corporation Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Cuban American National Council Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Centro Cultural of Washington County — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
83report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 324 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home