Skip to content

Massachusetts · Nonprofit

LIFEPATH INC

LIFEPATH INC (Massachusetts) receives grants from 19 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,718,256 to it, the largest being COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS ($706,358). 15 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$27M
Funders on record
19
Grants received
$1.7M
Net assets
$8.0M
15/19 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 2%
01What it does

What Lifepath Inc does

Mission

Lifepath, inc. Is a private non-profit organization, designated aging services access point and an area agency on aging. Its mission is to help elders live at home safely and independently for as long as possible by providing assistance and access to a comprehensive range of services. These services are either provided by lifepath or by agencies with whom it contracts. Eligibility criteria for the various programs and services are established by the massachusetts executive office of elder affairs and medicaid/masshealth.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Community choices programthe choices program was implemented to provide a higher level of service in the community to older adults who are eligible for mass health standard and who meet the requirements for nursing facility services. The goal of the program is to address the needs of the nursing facility eligible older adults who require enhanced services and who plan to live safely and independently at home. To be enrolled in the choices program, a consumer must meet the following criteria: be eligible for the home care program (see below), meet clinical eligibility for nursing facility services as determined by an aging services access point (asap) rn, require authorized services at a projected cost of at least 1.75 times the current home care program monthly purchased services rate, be enrolled in the frail elder waiver, and be enrolled in mass health standard.

    $3,999,793 spent
    17% of program spending
  2. Enhanced ecopthe enhanced community options program (ecop) was implemented to provide a higher level of service in the community to older adults who are not eligible for mass health standard and who meet the requirements for nursing facility services. As with choices, the goal of the program is to address the needs of the nursing facility eligible older adults who require enhanced services and who plan to live safely and independently at home. To be enrolled in the ecop program, a consumer must meet the following criteria: be eligible for the home care program (see below), meet clinical eligibility for nursing facility services as determined by an asap rn, require authorized services at a projected cost of at least 1.75 times the current home care program monthly purchased services rate, and not be enrolled in mass health standard.

    $3,065,242 spent
    13% of program spending
  3. State home care programprovides services to older adults age 60 and older (can be younger with alzheimer's/dementia diagnosis), to support their needs in the areas of activities of daily living (adls), and instrumental activities of daily living (iadls), enabling them to remain at home in the community. An older adult must have 6 iadls and/or 1 adls to qualify. Some exceptions can be made for older adults who have at least 4 iadls. Elder affairs contracts with 24 non-profit agencies (asaps) that are responsible for determining eligibility for home care services. The asap case manager authorizes and coordinates services which may include: personal care, homemaking, home delivered meals, adaptive equipment, chore, companion, home health services, grocery shopping, laundry, personal emergency response system, companionship, medical transportation, and respite.

    $5,446,796 spent$483,371 earned by the program
    23% of program spending
  4. Enhanced community options, protective service, congregate housing, supportive housing, clinical assess and eligibility, money management, elder care advisors, title iiib, title iiic, title iiie, personal care attendant, shine, goodlife, developmental services and senior care options.

    $10,908,203 spent$4,893,980 earned by the program
    47% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $23,420,034.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($19M) Expenses 100 ($19M) Net assets 100 ($4.2M)2018 Revenue 101 ($19M) Expenses 101 ($19M) Net assets 101 ($4.2M)2019 Revenue 101 ($19M) Expenses 99 ($18M) Net assets 110 ($4.6M)2020 Revenue 109 ($20M) Expenses 103 ($19M) Net assets 135 ($5.6M)2021 Revenue 109 ($20M) Expenses 108 ($20M) Net assets 146 ($6.1M)2022 Revenue 111 ($21M) Expenses 110 ($20M) Net assets 150 ($6.2M)2023 Revenue 111 ($21M) Expenses 116 ($22M) Net assets 139 ($5.8M)2024 Revenue 134 ($25M) Expenses 130 ($24M) Net assets 156 ($6.5M)2025 Revenue 145 ($27M) Expenses 137 ($26M) Net assets 192 ($8.0M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (145)Expenses (137)Net assets (192)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $8.5M to $9.9M (+16%).

$5.8M
$5.7M
$6.4M
$7.5M
$8.0M
$8.5M
$9.9M
$10M
$11M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2020 66% · 2021 71% · 2022 69% · 2023 73% · 2024 77% · 2025 78%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

80% of LIFEPATH INC’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (21% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 3,405 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$24k
’17
−$5k
’18
$355k
’19
$1.1M
’20
$227k
’21
$229k
’22
−$810k
’23
$675k
’24
$1.4M
’25
1.8
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Gary Yuhas

Executive director

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2018 and FY2019 filings.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed161816181617181819
Joined·+2+4+4+2+3+3+4+2
No longer listed·06242241
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 8 funders, grant income rose $32k → $360k.

2 of 19 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 41% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of LIFEPATH INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

LIFEPATH INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 41% of grant income and the top three 69%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

85% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund LIFEPATH INC.

41%
largest funder
69%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 69% · 2018 66% · 2019 40% · 2020 37% · 2021 47% · 2022 32% · 2023 88% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

60% of LIFEPATH INC's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 79% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

56% of LIFEPATH INC's grant income comes from Massachusetts funders.

VT
NY
MA
VA
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Massachusetts out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $707k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

LIFEPATH INC runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 2,396 human services nonprofits its size.

Operating margin5% · above the median
Months of reserve1.8mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)5% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,396 human services nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2025

Government funding LIFEPATH INC receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $161.3M on record.

State$161.3M
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Top programs
  • (MM) PURCHASED CLIENT/PROGRAM SVCS$124.6M
  • (RR) BENEFIT PROGRAMS$34.9M
  • (PP) STATE AID/POL SUB$1.8M
  • (EE) ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES$14k
  • (JJ) OPERATIONAL SERVICES$13k
  • (HH) CONSULTANT SVCS (TO DEPTS)$168

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like LIFEPATH INC

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Massachusetts

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

92% of spending goes to programs.

Program 92%Management 8%Fundraising 0%

Governance

15
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

MA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for LIFEPATH INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds LIFEPATH INC?
LIFEPATH INC (Massachusetts) receives grants from 19 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,718,256 to it, the largest being COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS ($706,358). 15 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does LIFEPATH INC have?
IRS filings report 19 organizations giving $1,718,256 in grants to LIFEPATH INC, 15 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of LIFEPATH INC?
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS is the largest funder on record, with $706,358 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like LIFEPATH INC find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Massachusetts. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Lifepath →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 19 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing