Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Community Catalyst Inc

To build the power of people to create a health system rooted in race equity and health justice and a society where health is a right for all.

$12M
Granted FY2024still arriving
82
Grants FY2024still arriving
38
States reached
$788k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$67MCivil Rights$4.9MCrime & Legal$4.6MHuman Services$4.0MPublic Benefit$2.5MCommunity Improvement$804kEmployment$670kHousing & Shelter$655kOther$0
02FY2024 · 82 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k26 grants · $500k
  • $50k–250k37 grants · $4.8M
  • $250k+19 grants · $6.7M
$96,000
Median grant
38
States reached
$48M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FLORIDA VOICES FOR HEALTH INC$788,000
TENNESSEE JUSTICE CENTER INC$558,823
MHM SUPPORT SERVICES$425,000
COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE ASSOCIATION OF THE DAKOTAS$425,000
CENTER FOR HEALTH PROGRESS$386,500
HEALTH CARE FOR ALL INC$381,705
NEW JERSEY CITIZEN ACTION EDUCATION FUND$375,000
CITIZEN ACTION OF WISCONSIN EDUCATION FUND$325,000
HEALTHY WYOMING$325,000
PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH ACCESS NETWORK$295,000
PARENT VOICES OAKLAND$283,000
ILLINOIS COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS$281,500
GEORGIA WATCH$280,000
VIRGINIA ORGANIZING INC$276,500
HOOSIER ACTION RESOURCE CENTER INC$276,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $11.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 61% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JANNUS INC: $405k → 8%SOMALI COMMUNITY RESETTLEMENT SERVICES OF OLMSTED COUNTY: $90k → 9%SOMALI COMMUNITY RESETTLEMENT SERVICES OF OLMSTED COUNTY: $145k → 11%MAKE THE ROAD STATES INC: $270k → 20%ABOUNDING PROSPERITY INC: $96k → 14%ARKANSAS COALITION OF MARSHALLESE: $90k → 14%HISPANIC COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $90k → 17%ARKANSAS ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $350k → 17%NORTH CAROLINA JUSTICE CENTER: $517k → 8%TOTAL LIFESTYLE CHANGE INC: $90k → 6%AREA FIVE AGENCY ON AGING & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $90k → 13%TUTWILER COMMUNITY EDUCATION CENTER INC: $90k → 31%YMCA OF GREATER NASHUA: $90k → 7%LA CASITA CENTER INC: $101k → 15%JANNUS INC: $117k → 8%SPECIAL SERVICE FOR GROUPS: $90k → 14%ABOUNDING PROSPERITY INC: $90k → 14%RIVA REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT VOICES IN ACTION: $101k → 10%NORTH CAROLINA JUSTICE CENTER: $252k → 8%SGA YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $101k → 14%LA CASITA CENTER INC: $90k → 15%JANNUS INC: $113k → 8%AFRICAN COMMUNITIES TOGETHER INC: $270k → 17%MAKE THE ROAD STATES INC (NEVADA): $110k → 20%ETHNIC MINORITIES OF BURMA ADVOCACY AND RESOURCE CENTER: $90k → 10%JANNUS INC: $112k → 8%THE AFIYA CENTER: $465k → 14%YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANTONIO AND BEXAR COUNTY: $96k → 16%SGA YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $92k → 14%JANNUS INC: $97k → 8%THE AFIYA CENTER: $219k → 14%YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION (OF SAN ANTONIO AND BEXAR COUNTY): $95k → 16%SGA YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $90k → 14%KOREAN RESOURCE CENTER INC: $90k → 14%THE AFIYA CENTER: $216k → 14%THE AFIYA CENTER: $105k → 14%COMMUNITY SERVICE SOC OF NY: $100k → 17%THE CONCILIO: $101k → 14%ARAB COMMUNITY CENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL SERVICES (ACCESS): $203k → 21%CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $195k → 9%COMMUNITY SERVICE SOCIETY OF NEW YORK: $99k → 17%ARAB COMM CTR FOR ECONOMICS: $218k → 21%PARENT VOICES OAKLAND: $283k → 10%Arab Community Center: $139k → 21%CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $150k → 9%PARENT VOICES OAKLAND: $253k → 10%PARENT VOICES OAKLAND: $214k → 10%PARENT VOICES OAKLAND: $100k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$74M · 181 repeat orgs$12M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.

181 repeat relationships — 65 still active in FY2024, 116 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

181
139

Total granted

$74M
$10M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+11%

Still filing today

94%
91%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementPublic BenefitCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TJ
    TENNESSEE JUSTICE CENTER INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +178%
  • FV
    FLORIDA VOICES FOR HEALTH INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $1.7M · revenue +222% · 89% of their budget
  • HC
    HEALTH CARE FOR ALL INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +291%

Funded once

  • CS
    California School-Based Health Alliancegraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $613k · revenue +49% · 34% of their budget
  • UF
    United for Respect Education Fund
    one grant, 2021 · $450k · revenue -71%
  • AA
    ARKANSAS ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
    one grant, 2023 · $350k · revenue -10%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
CommonHealth Action

CommonHealth ACTION develops people and organizations to produce health through equitable policies, programs, and practices.

Health
2
Consumer Health Coalition

Consumer Health Coalition (CHC) is dedicated to inspiring a consumer movement to advance the health and enhance access to quality and affordable healthcare. We further our mission by targeting populations that are at risk for experiencing…

Health
3
National Coalition On Health Care

The mission of the national coalition on health care (nchc) is to support research and analysis, develop and promote policy solutions, build consensus, and engage the public in order to ensure that america has a high quality health system…

Health
4
Alliance for a Healthier South Carolina

Convene and connect diverse stakeholders to align and catalyze efforts to improve health and well-being for communities across South Carolina.

—
5
Healthcare Access Maryland Inc

We are making maryland healthier by connecting residents to insurance and care, educating the community about healthier living, and advocating a more equitable health care system.

Health
6
HealthImpact

To shape health care through workforce strategy, stakeholder convening, and policy advocacy.

Health
7
California Black Health Network

The Organization advocates for health equity by leading and facilitating convenings in all regions of California for the purpose of providing policy analysis, research and training that promotes best practices, which supports the creation…

—
8
Community Health Partnership of Illinois

Strive to improve the health and well being of migrant and seasonal farmworkers and other medically vulnerable populations by providing quality accessable, affordable, and culturally responsive health care within the community we serve.

Health
9
Mhp Salud

We serve communities by embracing the strengths and experiences of individuals and families, engaging them to achieve health and well-being.

Health
10
Community Health Councils Inc

Community health councils, inc. dba rising communities' mission is to co-develop transformational social equity models and systems in service to bipoc communities, to help each person thrive.

Health
11
Mid-City Community Advocacy Network

Mid-city community advocacy network works to build a safe, productive, and healthy community for the residents of city heights and greater san diego through collaboration, advocacy, and organizing.

Community Improvement
12
African Com Public Health Coalition

To improve personal and community health and wellness within the african community by increasing the availability of culturally relevant physical and mental health services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Voices of Community Activists & Leaders (Vocal-Ny) Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Roberti Community House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyImmigrant Worker SupportCommunity FoundationsLgbtq+ Community SupportWomen & Girls Leadership De…Policy Research and AdvocacyCommunity FoundationsDomestic Violence ServicesUnited Way AffiliatesIndependent K-12 SchoolsYouth Development ServicesPublic Library OperationsSenior Support ServicesAffordable Housing Developm…Ymca Youth DevelopmentEnvironmental Conservation …Developmental Disabilities …Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Pregnancy Support ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%11%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr16%32%20–35yr13%27%35–55yr16%8%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%10%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr16%36%20–35yr13%27%35–55yr16%5%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%8/338
the rest of the field
13%
240,388/1,819,227

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

321 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 321 of the 339 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

50
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
91
Early backer (in before they grew)
314/321
Grantees still filing
207/321
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GEORGIANS FOR A HEALTHY FUTURE INC — $2,428,500 · HealthGEORGIANS FOR A HEALTHY F…FLORIDA VOICES FOR HEALTH INC — $1,701,000 · HealthFLORIDA VOICES FOR HEALTH…PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH ACCESS NETWORK — $1,128,000 · HealthPENNSYLVANIA HEALTH ACCES…HEALTH ACTION NEW MEXICO — $864,300 · HealthCENTER FOR HEALTH PROGRESS — $833,000 · HealthCalifornia Pan-Ethnic Health Network — $643,000 · HealthNorthwest Health Law Advocates — $621,000 · HealthThe Center For Medical Progress — $620,100 · HealthCalifornia School-Based Health Alliance — $612,500 · Health+36 more — $8,339,883 · Health+36 moreHEALTH CARE FOR ALL INC — $1,511,410 · OtherHEALTH CARE FOR ALL INCMAINE PEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTER — $1,206,990 · OtherCASA INC — $1,055,499 · OtherCOMMUNITY CARE NETWORK OF KANSAS INC — $991,500 · OtherAPANO COMMUNITIES UNITED FUND — $819,600 · OtherCOLORADO CONSUMER HEALTH INITIATIVE — $811,000 · OtherMHM Support Services — $808,783 · Other+58 more — $15,622,213 · Other+58 moreNORTH CAROLINA JUSTICE CENTER — $1,453,000 · Human ServicesNORTH CAROLINA …THE AFIYA CENTER — $1,003,950 · Human ServicesTHE AFIYA CENTE…JANNUS INC — $878,616 · Human ServicesJANNUS INCPARENT VOICES OAKLAND — $849,500 · Human ServicesPARENT VOICES O…Make The Road States Inc — $710,500 · Human ServicesMake The Road S…ARAB COMMUNITY CENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND S — $559,019 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S ALLIANCE — $460,000 · Human Services+22 more — $4,949,000 · Human Services+22 moreTEXAS ORGANIZING PROJECT EDUCATION FUND — $1,565,000 · Community ImprovementTEXAS ORGAN…The Rhode Island Organizing Project — $985,500 · Community ImprovementThe Rhode I…VIRGINIA ORGANIZING INC — $975,500 · Community ImprovementVIRGINIA OR…FUSION PARTNERSHIP INC — $801,300 · Community ImprovementFUSION PART…EL CENTRO INC — $754,500 · Community ImprovementEL CENTRO I…MOSES (METROPOLITAN ORGANIZING STRATEGY ENABLING STRENGTH) — $483,000 · Community ImprovementMOSES (METR…CATALYST MIAMI INC — $390,000 · Community ImprovementPEOPLE'S ACTION INSTITUTE — $305,000 · Community Improvement+11 more — $1,970,793 · Community Improvement+11 moreSALVATION AND SOCIAL JUSTICE A NJ N — $1,109,500 · Civil RightsSALVATION A…ILLINOIS COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS — $894,750 · Civil RightsILLINOIS CO…HOOSIER ACTION RESOURCE CENTER INC — $884,400 · Civil RightsHOOSIER ACT…SOMOS UN PUEBLO UNIDO — $758,000 · Civil RightsSOMOS UN PU…SOUTH CAROLINA APPLESEED LEGAL JUSTICE CENTER — $721,500 · Civil RightsSOUTH CAROL…MISSISSIPPI COALITION ON BLACK CIVIC PARTICIPATION — $540,100 · Civil RightsMISSISSIPPI…BVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE INC — $540,000 · Civil RightsBVM CAPACIT…OKLAHOMA POLICY INC — $418,057 · Civil RightsMOTHERING JUSTICE — $292,500 · Civil RightsLGBT CENTER OF RALEIGH INC — $280,000 · Civil RightsMASSACHUSETTS SENIOR ACTION COUNCIL INC — $270,000 · Civil Rights+7 more — $1,137,500 · Civil Rights+7 moreNEW JERSEY CITIZEN ACTION EDUCATION FUND INC — $1,280,000 · Public BenefitNEW JERSEY…CITIZEN ACTION OF WISCONSIN EDUCATION FUND INC — $1,073,000 · Public BenefitCITIZEN AC…ALABAMA ARISE — $909,500 · Public BenefitALABAMA AR…THE OHIO ORGANIZING COLLABORATIVE — $773,090 · Public BenefitTHE OHIO O…INVEST IN LOUISIANA — $718,000 · Public BenefitINVEST IN …GEORGIA WATCH — $688,500 · Public BenefitGEORGIA WA…GREATER CLEVELAND CONGREGATIONS INC — $453,000 · Public BenefitGREATER CL…EQUALITY STATE POLICY CENTER — $358,047 · Public BenefitCENTER FOR POPULAR DEMOCRACY INC — $337,500 · Public BenefitGEORGIA BUDGET AND POLICY INSTITUTE INC — $274,000 · Public Benefit+5 more — $684,000 · Public Benefit+5 moreTENNESSEE JUSTICE CENTER INC — $1,819,576 · Crime & LegalNEW MEXICO CENTER ON LAW AND POVERTY — $770,550 · Crime & LegalMake the Road New York — $635,000 · Crime & LegalMaine Equal Justice Partners — $539,603 · Crime & LegalSHRIVER CENTER ON POVERTY LAW — $515,500 · Crime & LegalCOLORADO CENTER ON LAW AND POLICY — $341,500 · Crime & LegalMEN STOPPING VIOLENCE INC — $261,875 · Crime & LegalCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY ALLIANCE INC — $227,030 · Crime & LegalNEBRASKA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST — $193,631 · Crime & Legal
Health$17,791,283Other$22,826,995Human Services$10,863,585Community Improvement$8,230,593Civil Rights$7,846,307Public Benefit$7,548,637Crime & Legal$5,304,265

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGEORGIANS FOR A HEALTHY FUTURE INC — $2,428,500 over 8y, 51% of budgetTENNESSEE JUSTICE CENTER INC — $1,819,576 over 8y, 11% of budgetFLORIDA VOICES FOR HEALTH INC — $1,701,000 over 5y, 89% of budgetTEXAS ORGANIZING PROJECT EDUCATION FUND — $1,565,000 over 4y, 9.6% of budgetHEALTH CARE FOR ALL INC — $1,511,410 over 6y, 12% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA JUSTICE CENTER — $1,453,000 over 4y, 10% of budgetNEW JERSEY CITIZEN ACTION EDUCATION FUND INC — $1,280,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetMAINE PEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTER — $1,206,990 over 7y, 10% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA HEALTH ACCESS NETWORK — $1,128,000 over 6y, 17% of budgetSALVATION AND SOCIAL JUSTICE A NJ N — $1,109,500 over 5y, 34% of budgetCITIZEN ACTION OF WISCONSIN EDUCATION FUND INC — $1,073,000 over 6y, 27% of budgetCASA INC — $1,055,499 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetTHE AFIYA CENTER — $1,003,950 over 4y, 46% of budgetCOMMUNITY CARE NETWORK OF KANSAS INC — $991,500 over 5y, 7.0% of budgetThe Rhode Island Organizing Project — $985,500 over 8y, 94% of budgetVIRGINIA ORGANIZING INC — $975,500 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetALABAMA ARISE — $909,500 over 4y, 20% of budgetILLINOIS COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS — $894,750 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetHOOSIER ACTION RESOURCE CENTER INC — $884,400 over 5y, 73% of budgetJANNUS INC — $878,616 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetHEALTH ACTION NEW MEXICO — $864,300 over 4y, 83% of budgetPARENT VOICES OAKLAND — $849,500 over 4y, 61% of budgetCENTER FOR HEALTH PROGRESS — $833,000 over 3y, 27% of budgetAPANO COMMUNITIES UNITED FUND — $819,600 over 4y, 9.4% of budgetCOLORADO CONSUMER HEALTH INITIATIVE — $811,000 over 6y, 15% of budgetMHM Support Services — $808,783 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFUSION PARTNERSHIP INC — $801,300 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetTHE OHIO ORGANIZING COLLABORATIVE — $773,090 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetNEW MEXICO CENTER ON LAW AND POVERTY — $770,550 over 7y, 7.3% of budgetSOMOS UN PUEBLO UNIDO — $758,000 over 3y, 27% of budgetEL CENTRO INC — $754,500 over 5y, 5.6% of budgetSOUTH CAROLINA APPLESEED LEGAL JUSTICE CENTER — $721,500 over 3y, 28% of budgetINVEST IN LOUISIANA — $718,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetMake The Road States Inc — $710,500 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetGEORGIA WATCH — $688,500 over 4y, 28% of budgetHEALTH ACCESS FOUNDATION — $645,000 over 5y, 5.3% of budgetCalifornia Pan-Ethnic Health Network — $643,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetMake the Road New York — $635,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetNorthwest Health Law Advocates — $621,000 over 6y, 13% of budgetThe Center For Medical Progress — $620,100 over 3y, 32% of budgetWEST VIRGINIANS FOR AFFORDABLE HEALTH CARE — $616,100 over 6y, 30% of budgetCalifornia School-Based Health Alliance — $612,500 over 1y, 34% of budgetSolid Ground Washington — $575,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetWOMENS OPPORTUNITY AND RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT INC — $564,500 over 4y, 29% of budgetARAB COMMUNITY CENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND S — $559,019 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetMISSISSIPPI COALITION ON BLACK CIVIC PARTICIPATION — $540,100 over 5y, 13% of budgetBVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE INC — $540,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetMaine Equal Justice Partners — $539,603 over 3y, 23% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GEORGIANS FOR A HEALTHY FUTURE INC ↗
  • Who funds TENNESSEE JUSTICE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA VOICES FOR HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS ORGANIZING PROJECT EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH CARE FOR ALL INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA JUSTICE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NEW JERSEY CITIZEN ACTION EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds MAINE PEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH ACCESS NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds SALVATION AND SOCIAL JUSTICE A NJ N ↗
  • Who funds CITIZEN ACTION OF WISCONSIN EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AFIYA CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CARE NETWORK OF KANSAS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Rhode Island Organizing Project ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA ORGANIZING INC ↗
  • Who funds ALABAMA ARISE ↗
  • Who funds ILLINOIS COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds HOOSIER ACTION RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds JANNUS INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH ACTION NEW MEXICO ↗
  • Who funds PARENT VOICES OAKLAND ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR HEALTH PROGRESS ↗
  • Who funds APANO COMMUNITIES UNITED FUND ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO CONSUMER HEALTH INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds MHM Support Services ↗
  • Who funds FUSION PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds THE OHIO ORGANIZING COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO CENTER ON LAW AND POVERTY ↗
  • Who funds SOMOS UN PUEBLO UNIDO ↗
  • Who funds EL CENTRO INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH CAROLINA APPLESEED LEGAL JUSTICE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds INVEST IN LOUISIANA ↗
  • Who funds Make The Road States Inc ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIA WATCH ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH ACCESS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds California Pan-Ethnic Health Network ↗
  • Who funds Make the Road New York ↗
  • Who funds Northwest Health Law Advocates ↗
  • Who funds The Center For Medical Progress ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Catalyst Ac…New Venture FundHopewell FundEconomic Policy Insti…Center on Budget and …NEO Philanthropy IncAmalgamated Charitabl…Center for Law and So…Annie E Casey Foundat…Carequest Foundation …CareQuest Institute f…Center for Community …
Community Catalyst Action Fund IncMA81× affinity37 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Catalyst Action Fund Inc · New Venture Fund · Hopewell Fund · Economic Policy Institute · Center on Budget and Policy Priorities · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Center for Law and Social Policy · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · Carequest Foundation Inc · CareQuest Institute for Oral Health Inc · Center for Community Change

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Community Catalyst Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 120%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Luk Crisis Center Inc — 95% of income from government
  • Salvation and Social Justice a Nj N — 52% of income from government
  • Baltimore Healthy Start Inc — 43% of income from government
  • Health Care for All Inc — 29% of income from government
  • Centerlink Inc — 12% of income from government
  • Social Capital Inc — 11% of income from government
  • Connecticut Oral Health Initiative Inc — 9% of income from government
  • New Jersey Citizen Action Education Fund Inc — 9% of income from government
  • Casa Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Fusion Partnership Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Nueva Esperanza Inc — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
12get no government money at all
71report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 339 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home