Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Scan Health Plan

Scan's mission is to keep seniors healthy and independent.

$5.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
51
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$2.8M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$13MFood & Nutrition$2.8MHuman Services$2.0MEducation$732kHousing & Shelter$392kPublic Safety & Disaster$330kPublic Benefit$150kArts & Culture$115kOther$0
02FY2024 · 51 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 51 grants below total $4,768,906 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,999,740 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $230,834 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k45 grants · $842k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $113k
  • $250k+2 grants · $3.8M
$20,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.0B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEALTHCARE IN ACTION$2,800,000
HEALTHCARE IN ACTION$1,000,000
LOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER$62,500
MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC DBA RIP MEDICAL DEBT$50,000
CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY$46,906
SOURCEWISE$30,000
PROYECTO PASTORAL$30,000
KOREAN HEALTH EDUCATION INFORMATION AND RESEARCH CENTER (DBA KHEIR CLINIC)$30,000
SERVICE OPPORTUNITY FOR SENIORS (DBA SOS MEALS ON WHEELS)$30,000
RIVERSIDE-SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY INDIAN HEALTH INC$25,000
GOLDEN VALLEY HEALTH CENTERS$25,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY$25,000
SOMANG SOCIETY$25,000
OPENHOUSE$25,000
FRESNO COUNTY ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES COMMISSION$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MARIN SENIOR COORDINATING COUNCIL: $20k → 8%COMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY: $20k → 9%CERES COMMUNITYPROJECT: $25k → 9%LATINO HEALTH ACCESS (LATINO CENTER FOR PREVENTION AND ACTION IN HEALTH): $20k → 10%COVE COMMUNITIES SENIOR ASSOCIATION (DBA THE JOSLYN CENTER): $25k → 11%TIDES CENTER: $30k → 12%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY: $25k → 14%TURLOCK GOSPEL MISSION: $25k → 15%INNOVATIVE HEALTH CARE SERVICES PEG TAYLOR: $30k → 18%MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC DBA RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $285k → 13%CERES COMMUNITYPROJECT: $25k → 9%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $25k → 11%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY: $25k → 14%FRESNO COUNTY ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES COMMISSION: $25k → 19%MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC DBA RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $50k → 13%ELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO: $25k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE DESERT: $20k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $20k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE DESERT: $20k → 11%SOURCEWISE: $30k → 8%INSTITUTE ON AGING: $25k → 10%FOOD INITIATIVE OF GREATER STANISLAUS: $25k → 15%INTERFAITH MINISTRIES OF GREATER MODESTO: $20k → 15%JANET GOESKE FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%JANET GOESKE FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $25k → 8%CONEJO VALLEY SENIOR CONCERNS INC: $25k → 10%CONEJO VALLEY SENIOR CONCERNS: $20k → 10%CONEJO VALLEY SENIOR CONCERNS INC: $20k → 10%SENIOR CONCERNS: $20k → 10%INSTITUTE ON AGING: $35k → 10%INSTITUTE ON AGING: $25k → 10%SERVING SENIORS: $30k → 11%INSTITUTE ON AGING: $25k → 10%SERVING SENIORS: $30k → 11%HUMAN SERVICES ASSOCIATION: $25k → 14%SERVING SENIORS: $25k → 11%HUMAN SERVICES ASSOCIATION: $20k → 14%ONLOK: $25k → 10%ABRAZAR INC: $25k → 10%WATTS LABOR COMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE (WLCAC): $36k → 14%HUMAN SERVICES ASSOCIATION: $25k → 14%UNITED AMERICAN INDIAN INVOLVEMENT: $35k → 14%UNITED CAMBODIAN COMMUNITY: $30k → 14%PROYECTO PASTORAL: $30k → 14%PROYECTO PASTORAL: $25k → 14%UMMA COMMUNITY CLINIC: $25k → 14%ENGAGE: $30k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
NV
IA
NJ
CA
MD
AZ
NC
DC
HI
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$17M · 105 repeat orgs$2.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.

105 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2024, 84 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

105
84

Total granted

$17M
$2.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+31%

Still filing today

95%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $497k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterEducationCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HI
    HEALTHCARE IN ACTION INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $11M · revenue ×13 · 99% of their budget
  • LB
    LONG BEACH STATE FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2023 · $394k · revenue +160%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    3× · 2021–2023 · $375k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • ER
    E4E RELIEF LLCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $300k · revenue +74%
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2020 · $160k
  • HA
    HIGHER AMBITION LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE INC
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue -39%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Council on Aging Services for Seniors

To enhance the quality of life for our aging community by providing services that promote wellbeing and maintain independence.

—
2
Meals On Wheels of the Salinas Valley

No senior should go hungry. nutritious meals, which are delivered by caring volunteers, improve the health and well-being of people who are homebound, elderly, or disabled and help them remain in their homes and maintain their independence.

Food & Nutrition
3
Santa Clarita Valley Committee On Aging

The SCVCOA and the Senior Center currently serves more than 10,000 individuals annually through varied programming for the Santa Clarita Valley and Antelope Valley that includes but is not limited to: congregate and home delivered meals…

Human Services
4
West Contra Costa County Meals On Wheels

Enable frail seniors to maintain their independence at home by providing them with high quality, nutritious meals that are cost effective, prepared in West Contra Costa County, delivered by caring drivers and administered by local…

Food & Nutrition
5
Health Projects Center

Health Projects Center supports people as they age to live safely at home by delivering high quality services and programs in the Monterey Bay Region.

Crime & Legal
6
Curry Senior Center

To provide services to seniors that promote independent living while maintaining their dignity and self-esteem.

Human Services
7
Via Care Community Health Center

Providing health care services to the poor and underserved of los angeles.

Health
8
Senior Nutrition Program of San Luis Obispo County

Provide meals and nutritional education to seniors in San Luis Obispo County.

Food & Nutrition
9
Meals on Wheels by Acc

Our mission is to serve nutritious meals with a friendly smile to seniors in Sacramento County.

Food & Nutrition
10
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
11
Irvine Adult Day Health Services Inc

Irvine adult day health services, together with families and the community, promotes a lifestyle of health, independence and active living for disabled and older adults.

Human Services
12
Southern California Rehabilitation Services Inc

To operate community service centers to improve physical,social and financial conditions for the disabled and the elderly.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Seniorserv Inc and the most unlike its peers is Gwendolyn and Joseph Straus Charitable Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Health CentersAt-Risk Youth MentoringPolicy Research and AdvocacyLegal Services & AdvocacyFamily Philanthropic Founda…Christian Missionary Organi…Asian Faith & Cultural Cent…Youth Sports & Music Progra…Arts & Culture OrganizationsDevelopmental Disabilities …Jewish Community Organizati…University Support Organiza…Senior Affordable HousingCrisis Support & Stabilizat…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%2%<5yr16%3%5–10yr20%13%10–20yr17%28%20–35yr11%33%35–55yr12%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%58%<5yr16%1%5–10yr20%9%10–20yr17%10%20–35yr11%13%35–55yr12%9%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 58% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.4% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.4%1/220
the rest of the field
15%
18,685/127,401

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

206 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 206 of the 220 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
33
Early backer (in before they grew)
201/206
Grantees still filing
156/206
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HEALTHCARE IN ACTION INC — $10,500,000 · HealthHEALTHCARE IN ACTION INC+35 more — $1,870,300 · Health+35 moreMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC — $334,719 · Human ServicesMEDICAL DEBT RE…SERVING SENIORS — $125,000 · Human ServicesINSTITUTE ON AGING — $110,000 · Human ServicesCONEJO VALLEY SENIOR CONCERNS INC — $95,000 · Human ServicesHuman Services Association — $95,000 · Human Services+60 more — $1,862,450 · Human Services+60 moreLOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER — $175,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES LG…THE SALVATION ARMY — $160,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION …ONEGENERATION — $140,000 · OtherONEGENERATIONSTRAIGHT TALK — $90,000 · OtherSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK — $85,000 · OtherHIGHER AMBITION LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE INC — $100,000 · Other+65 more — $1,658,390 · Other+65 moreLONG BEACH STATE FOUNDATION — $393,500 · EducationCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY — $168,431 · EducationHEALTH INDUSTRY COLLABORATION EFFRT — $120,000 · EducationOne in Long Beach Inc dba The LGBTQ Center Long Beach — $50,000 · Education+4 more — $95,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY SENIORSERV INC — $115,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC — $95,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD SHARE INC — $75,000 · Food & NutritionREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK — $65,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD FOR THOUGHT — $60,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS-ON-WHEELS GREATER SAN DIEGO INC — $60,000 · Food & NutritionProject Open Hand — $30,000 · Food & NutritionFOODBANK OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $30,000 · Food & NutritionFEEDING SAN DIEGO — $30,000 · Food & NutritionSERVICE OPPORTUNITY FOR SENIORS — $30,000 · Food & NutritionSt Francis Living Room — $25,000 · Food & Nutrition+7 more — $105,000 · Food & NutritionE4E RELIEF LLC — $300,000 · Public Safety & DisasterFUSE Corps — $150,000 · Public Benefit
Health$12,370,300Human Services$2,622,169Other$2,408,390Education$826,931Food & Nutrition$720,000Public Safety & Disaster$300,000Public Benefit$150,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHEALTHCARE IN ACTION INC — $10,500,000 over 4y, 99% of budgetLONG BEACH STATE FOUNDATION — $393,500 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $375,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC — $334,719 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetE4E RELIEF LLC — $300,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetLOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER — $175,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY — $168,431 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFUSE Corps — $150,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetONEGENERATION — $140,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetPURCHASER BUSINESS GROUP ON HEALTH — $136,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetPROJECT ANGEL FOOD — $135,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetSERVING SENIORS — $125,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetHEALTH INDUSTRY COLLABORATION EFFRT — $120,000 over 5y, 6.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY SENIORSERV INC — $115,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetALZHEIMERS GREATER LOS ANGELES — $115,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetTHE HEALTH TRUST — $110,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetINSTITUTE ON AGING — $110,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHIGHER AMBITION LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE INC — $100,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetCONEJO VALLEY SENIOR CONCERNS INC — $95,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetHuman Services Association — $95,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC — $95,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK — $85,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF ORANGE COUNTY — $80,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD SHARE INC — $75,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO — $75,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF LONG TERM CARE MEDICINE — $72,500 over 2y, 16% of budgetWISE AND HEALTHY AGING — $70,550 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF SAN FRANCISCO INC — $70,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetENGAGE INC — $70,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetALZHEIMER'S ORANGE COUNTY — $68,750 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetPARTNERS IN CARE FOUNDATION — $65,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE DESERT — $65,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK — $65,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetKOREAN HEALTH EDUCATION INFORMATION AND RESEARCH CENTER — $65,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFOOD FOR THOUGHT — $60,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetSMILES FOR SENIORS FOUNDATION — $60,000 over 4y, 24% of budgetMEALS-ON-WHEELS GREATER SAN DIEGO INC — $60,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSpecial Service for Groups Inc — $57,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY — $55,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetFallbrook Healthcare Foundation Inc — $55,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetProyecto Pastoral — $55,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetST VINCENT SENIOR CITIZEN NUTRITION PROGRAM INC — $50,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT — $50,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetAge Well Senior Services Inc — $50,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOne in Long Beach Inc dba The LGBTQ Center Long Beach — $50,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetANTELOPE VALLEY PARTNERS FOR HEALTH — $50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kaiser Foundation Hos…Weingart FoundationArchstone FoundationThe California Endowm…California Community …Public Health Institu…The Ralph M Parsons F…California Healthcare…The California Wellne…Cedars-Sinai Medical …Dignity HealthNational Council on A…
Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCA100.9× affinity88 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Weingart Foundation · Archstone Foundation · The California Endowment · California Community Foundation · Public Health Institute · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · California Healthcare Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · Dignity Health · National Council on Aging Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Scan Health Plan funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    103report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 220 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines