Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Direct Relief

DIRECT RELIEF is a humanitarian aid organization, active in all 50 states and more than 80 countries, with a mission to improve the health and lives of people affected by poverty or emergencies - without regard to politics, religion, or ability to pay.

$2.0B
Granted FY2025still arriving
232
Grants FY2025still arriving
37
States reached
$4.3M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.

Health$189MHuman Services$52MPublic Safety & Disaster$51MInternational$13MCommunity Improvement$4.0MHousing & Shelter$1.4MYouth Development$1.3MEnvironment$1.0MOther$0
02FY2025 · 232 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 232 grants below total $41,492,207 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,002,150,217 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,960,658,010 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k54 grants · $1.4M
  • $50k–250k134 grants · $16M
  • $250k+40 grants · $24M
$100,000
Median grant
37
States reached
$1.3B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATION$4,335,895
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICS$1,600,000
UTAH NAVAJO HEALTH SYSTEMS INC$1,053,064
NAT'L ASSOC OF COMM HEALTH CENTERS$1,000,000
NATIVE HEALTH$956,962
CONFEDERATED SALISH & KOOTENAI TRIBES$939,978
ALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORP$914,110
THE PASCUA YAQUI TRIBE$829,307
SOUTHEAST ALASKA REGIONAL HEALTH CONSOR$698,410
COLLIER HEALTH$557,046
MOUNTAIN AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INC$525,000
FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS OF SW FL$506,335
PASADENA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$500,000
WNC FOOD SYSTEMS COALITION$500,000
LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT EDUCATION FOUNDATION$500,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $77.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HARMONY HEALTH: $250k → 15%KEE CHA E NAR: $250k → 17%SHARE OUR SELVES CORPORATION: $270k → 10%LA FAMILIA COUNSELING CENTER INC: $225k → 12%CARE FOR THE HOMELESS: $243k → 17%SHARE OUR SELVES CORPORATION: $200k → 10%SELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLY: $450k → 10%SELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLY: $176k → 10%DIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATION: $21.3M → 14%DIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATION: $13.1M → 14%DIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATION: $7.1M → 14%DIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATION: $6.7M → 14%DIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATION: $4.3M → 14%DIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATION: $4.0M → 14%DIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATION: $3.9M → 14%DIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATION: $1.3M → 14%ALTERNATIVE STRUCTURES INTERNATIONAL: $200k → 9%CHANGE REACTION: $500k → 14%UNIVERSITY MUSLIM MEDICAL ASSOCIATION: $407k → 14%EL PROYECTO DEL BARRIOINC: $300k → 14%THE PASCUA YAQUI TRIBE: $829k → 15%YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $225k → 16%TEWA WOMEN UNITED: $500k → 12%HISPANIC COMMUNITY SERVICES INC D: $200k → 17%CENTRO HISPANO DE EAST TENNESSEE: $200k → 12%NC MEDASSIST: $263k → 10%NORTH HUDSON COMMUNITY ACTION CORP: $238k → 14%PERC INC: $300k → 9%YOUTH DEVELOPMENT INC (YDI): $380k → 14%CENTRO HISPANO DE EAST TENNESSEE: $186k → 12%ASIAN SERVICES IN ACTION INC: $224k → 13%LA PLAZITA INSTITUTE: $250k → 14%CHILDREN'S VILLAGE: $200k → 16%GROWING GARDENS: $360k → 12%EL CENTRO DE LA RAZA: $250k → 9%LA PLAZITA INSTITUTE: $200k → 14%CHILDREN'S VILLAGE: $175k → 16%GROWING GARDENS: $200k → 12%BAYOUCLINIC INC: $250k → 19%OPPORTUNITY CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS: $241k → 21%THE CONCILIO: $250k → 14%OPPORTUNITY CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS: $180k → 21%THE GLADES INITIATIVE INC: $250k → 11%THE CONCILIO: $200k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $300k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $200k → 14%NATIONAL ALLIANCE HISPANIC HEALTH: $250k → 14%PORT MINISTRIES: $200k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region — $1.7B on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 9 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Russia and Neighboring States$561M · 34% · 60 grants

Stated purpose: UKRAINE CRISIS RELIEF & RECOVERY · PHARMACEUTICALS, MEDICAL SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT · PHARMACEUTICALS

Middle East and North Africa$374M · 23% · 44 grants

Stated purpose: ISRAEL/PALESTINE RELIEF & RECOVERY · PHARMACEUTICALS · PHARMACEUTICALS, OTHER, MEDICAL SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT

Sub-Saharan Africa$347M · 21% · 178 grants

Stated purpose: TAKEDA CAP PROGRAM · VASELINE HEALING PROJECT · SUPPORT OF RELATED PARTY ORGANIZATION IN SOUTH AFRICA

South Asia$177M · 11% · 118 grants

Stated purpose: GENERAL EMERGENCY PREP & RESPONSE · GENERAL HEALTHCARE PROVIDER SUPPORT · COVID INDIA RELIEF & RECOVERY

Central America and the Caribbean$105M · 6% · 76 grants

Stated purpose: CARIBBEAN RESILIENCY FUND · GLOBAL COLD CHAIN CAPACITY BUILDING · GENERAL EMERGENCY PREP & RESPONSE

South America$45M · 3% · 21 grants

Stated purpose: BRAZIL FLOODS RELIEF & RECOVERY · PHARMACEUTICALS, MEDICAL SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT · PHARMACEUTICALS, MEDICAL SUPPLIES

East Asia and the Pacific$26M · 2% · 30 grants

Stated purpose: GENERAL EMERGENCY PREP & RESPONSE · ISRAEL/PALESTINE RELIEF & RECOVERY · PHILIPPINES COUNTRY SUPPORT

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$14M · 1% · 24 grants

Stated purpose: EUROPE FLOODING RELIEF & RECOVERY · GENERAL EMERGENCY PREP & RESPONSE · TURKEY/SYRIA EATHQUAKE RELIEF & RECOVERY

North America (Canada and Mexico)$998k · 0% · 6 grants

Stated purpose: HURRICANE OTIS RELIEF & RECOVERY · HURRICANE JOHN RELIEF & RECOVERY · MEDICAL SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of Direct Relief’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Direct Relieflessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.3% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$251M · 425 repeat orgs$64M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.

425 repeat relationships — 123 still active in FY2025, 302 since wound down; 107 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

425
529

Total granted

$251M
$48M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+37%

Still filing today

95%
91%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationPublic Safety & DisasterCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NA
    NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICS INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $11M · revenue +19% · 67% of their budget
  • HF
    HPM FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $2.6M · revenue +54%
  • FH
    FUNDACION HOSPITAL PEDIATRICO
    4× · 2019–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +106% · 62% of their budget

Funded once

  • HN
    HUI NO KE OLA PONO INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $1.1M · revenue 0%
  • IC
    INICIATIVA COMUNITARIA DE INVESTIGACION INCgraduated
    4× · 2018–2024 · $896k · revenue +107% · 36% of their budget
  • TN
    THE NAVAJO NATION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $733k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Medical Center

Strive to make better health easier by providing access to affordable, high quality health services through equitable, innovative, and inclusive care models that support patient care, education, research, & community service.

Health
2
Community Medical Center

Hospital serving ocean county and is committed to enhancing the overall health status of the community by providing the highest quality healthcare and related services.

Health
3
Community Health Clinic Inc

To provide quality, community-based primary preventative health services.

Health
4
Family Health Center Inc

To provide patients with the highest quality of care/services, including basic primary and preventive medical care, vision, dental, OB/GYN, WIC services, and hospitalization.

Health
5
Interior Community Health Center

Our mission is to provide universal access to excellent primary health care for patients of all ages, stages of life, and backgrounds.

Health
6
East Texas Community Clinic Inc

Provides access to high quality primary care to any resident in east texas.

—
7
Community Health Services Inc

To provide medical services for the residents of the greater hartford connecticut area. to provide quality health care services to low and moderate income individuals in the greater hartford connecticut area regardless of ability to pay.

Health
8
Community Health Center of

To provide non-emergent primary healthcare to the uninsured, under insured and insured residents of northeast oklahoma.

Health
9
Community Clinics Health Network

Hqp offers an array of programs that promote access to and improve the quality of services provided by our member health centers to the communities they serve.

Health
10
Northwest Community Health Care

The organization is a federally qualified health center that provides primary medical, dental, behavioral health, pharmacy and related patient support services to more than 18,000 individuals regardless of ability to pay.

Health
11
Complete Care Community Health Center I

The organization is devoted to serving the medical needs of the underprivileged of california.

Health
12
First Care Clinic Inc

First care clinic is a federally qualified health center providing medical, behavioral health and dental services to all, including the uninsured.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is First Choice Health Centers Inc and the most unlike its peers is Yale University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPregnancy Support ServicesImmigrant Worker SupportCommunity College Foundatio…Women & Girls Leadership De…Community FoundationsLocal Food System Organizat…Cancer Support ServicesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Youth Development CentersSenior Support ServicesVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Affordable Housing Developm…Independent K-12 SchoolsEnvironmental Conservation …Developmental Disabilities …Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Policy Research and AdvocacyFaith-Based Social ServicesAnimal Rescue and ShelterChristian Youth CampsLgbtq+ Community SupportDomestic Violence ServicesFood Banks and PantriesMilitary Veterans SupportSchool District FoundationsAffordable Housing Construc…Addiction Recovery ServicesCommunity FoundationsChristian Missionary Organi…Health Access Advocacy and …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%17%10–20yr16%34%20–35yr13%29%35–55yr16%12%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%32%10–20yr16%28%20–35yr13%28%35–55yr16%6%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%42/2,515
the rest of the field
13%
240,354/1,817,050

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

1729 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

51
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
298
Early backer (in before they grew)
1671/1729
Grantees still filing
1268/1729
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

+107 more — $84,642,093 · Health+107 moreDIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATION — $61,794,439 · Human ServicesDIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATION+17 more — $9,404,928 · Human Services+17 moreMIGRANT HEALTH CENTER WESTERN REGION INC — $1,857,683 · OtherMED CENTRO INC — $1,746,560 · Other+52 more — $33,378,897 · Other+52 moreNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICS INC — $11,281,665 · Community ImprovementFOUNDATION FOR PUERTO RICO INC — $3,724,438 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY OF HOPE — $905,000 · Community Improvement+2 more — $915,000 · Community ImprovementTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $1,651,000 · EducationSHARED HARVEST FOUNDATION INC — $790,000 · EducationAlaska Pacific University — $608,615 · EducationMOUNTAIN AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INC — $525,000 · EducationGREATER LOS ANGELES EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $500,000 · EducationLOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $500,000 · EducationCAREMESSAGE — $500,000 · EducationPONCE MEDICAL SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC — $499,725 · EducationGIRLTREK INCORPORATED — $450,000 · EducationMEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE — $400,000 · EducationFOOTPRINT PROJECT — $750,000 · Public Safety & DisasterSanta Barbara County Search and Rescue Inc — $636,354 · Public Safety & DisasterOxnard Firefighters Foundation Inc — $533,000 · Public Safety & DisasterONE805 INC — $494,000 · Public Safety & DisasterVOCES COALICION DE INMUNIZACION Y PROMOCIION DE LA SALUD INC — $1,910,051 · InternationalSISTERLOVE INCORPORATED — $425,000 · International
Health$84,642,093Human Services$71,199,367Other$36,983,140Community Improvement$16,826,103Education$6,424,340Public Safety & Disaster$2,413,354International$2,335,051

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATION — $61,794,439 over 8y, 90% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICS INC — $11,281,665 over 7y, 67% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR PUERTO RICO INC — $3,724,438 over 4y, 27% of budgetHPM FOUNDATION INC — $2,608,358 over 8y, 2.7% of budgetFUNDACION HOSPITAL PEDIATRICO — $1,971,550 over 4y, 62% of budgetVOCES COALICION DE INMUNIZACION Y PROMOCIION DE LA SALUD INC — $1,910,051 over 8y, 12% of budgetMiami Beach Community Health Center Inc — $1,860,000 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetMIGRANT HEALTH CENTER WESTERN REGION INC — $1,857,683 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetCOLLIER HEALTH SERVICES INC — $1,756,115 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetMED CENTRO INC — $1,746,560 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $1,651,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC — $1,650,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetTHE MAVEN PROJECT — $1,622,400 over 4y, 21% of budgetSOCIETY OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE — $1,500,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetINTERCAMBIOS PUERTO RICO INC — $1,492,554 over 5y, 6.7% of budgetHEALTHY MOTHERS HEALTHY BABIES COALITION OF HAWAII — $1,420,000 over 5y, 24% of budgetCOSSMA INC — $1,419,421 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetCORPORACION DE SALUD ASEGURADA POR NUESTRA ORGANIZACION SOLIDARIA INC — $1,396,400 over 8y, 2.9% of budgetSalud Integral de la Montana Inc — $1,326,300 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetGulf Coast Health Center Inc — $1,324,265 over 8y, 7.1% of budgetTHE INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY HEALTH — $1,238,962 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetASIAN HEALTH SERVICES — $1,214,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCommunity Health of South Florida Inc — $1,207,217 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetFAMILY HEALTH CENTERS OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC — $1,202,457 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetFORT BEND FAMILY HEALTH CENTER INC — $1,159,437 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetSPRING BRANCH COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $1,149,509 over 7y, 4.8% of budgetGOSHEN MEDICAL CENTER INC — $1,147,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY CLINIC OF MAUI INC — $1,099,260 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetBORINQUEN HEALTH CARE CENTER INC — $1,071,760 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION — $1,064,110 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHUI NO KE OLA PONO INC — $1,050,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetNorth Florida Medical Centers Inc — $1,027,820 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetVALLEY HEALTH TEAM INC — $1,000,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetUNITED METHODIST WESTERN KANSAS MEXICAN- AMERICAN MINISTRIES INC — $1,000,000 over 4y, 4.4% of budgetCOSTA SALUD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC — $966,800 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS OF PINELLAS INC D/B/A EVARA HEALTH — $950,758 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetNEOMED CENTER INC NEOMED CENTER INC — $915,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetTRIANGLE AREA NETWORK INC — $913,149 over 7y, 8.5% of budgetWEST SIDE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC — $910,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY OF HOPE — $905,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetURBAN HEALTH PLAN INC — $900,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetZUFALL HEALTH CENTER INC — $900,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetINICIATIVA COMUNITARIA DE INVESTIGACION INC — $896,444 over 4y, 36% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS OF SOUTH CENTRAL TEXAS INC — $880,890 over 8y, 4.2% of budgetCONSUELO ZOBEL ALGER FOUNDATION — $880,000 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetNATIONAL BLACK NURSES ASSOCIATION INC — $878,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetHogar Del Buen Pastor Inc — $877,182 over 4y, 22% of budgetMENDOCINO COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC INC — $860,919 over 3y, 1.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Americares Foundation…National Association …Heart to Heart Intern…Delta Dental Communit…California Primary Ca…Sostento IncEssential Access Heal…California Physicians…Upstream USA IncPfizer Patient Assist…American Academy of F…American Cancer Socie…
Americares Foundation IncCT187.1× affinity697 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Americares Foundation Inc · National Association of Free and Charitable Clinics Inc · Heart to Heart International Inc · Delta Dental Community Care Foundation · California Primary Care Association · Sostento Inc · Essential Access Health · California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn · Upstream USA Inc · Pfizer Patient Assistance Foundation Inc · American Academy of Family Physicians Fdn · American Cancer Society Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Direct Relief funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 15%
  • Harbor Health Services Inc — 39% of income from government
  • North Florida Medical Centers Inc — 33% of income from government
  • Zufall Health Center Inc — 32% of income from government
  • Premier Community HealthCare Group Inc — 24% of income from government
  • Primary Care Medical Services of Poinciana Inc — 23% of income from government
  • Im Sulzbacher Center for the Homeless Inc — 23% of income from government
  • Community Health of South Florida Inc — 22% of income from government
  • Central Florida Family Health Center Inc — 18% of income from government
  • Florida Association of Community Health Centers Inc — 17% of income from government
  • Suncoast Community Health Centers Inc — 17% of income from government
  • Florida Community Health Centers Inc — 17% of income from government
  • Massachusetts League of Community Health Centers Inc — 15% of income from government
  • Collier Health Services Inc — 15% of income from government
  • Pancare of Florida Inc — 15% of income from government
  • Miami Beach Community Health Center Inc — 13% of income from government
  • One Community Health — 13% of income from government
  • Borinquen Health Care Center Inc — 13% of income from government
  • National Association of Community Health Centers Inc — 12% of income from government
  • Cornell Scott-Hill Health Corporation — 12% of income from government
  • Family Health Centers of Southwest Florida Inc — 11% of income from government
  • Casa Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Mcr Health Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Central Florida Health Care Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Growing Gardens — 6% of income from government
  • Citrus Health Network Inc — 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
41report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 1064 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines