· Public charity
National Foundation for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Inc
The cdc foundation helps the public health system, including the centers for disease control and prevention (cdc), by forging effective partnerships between government, philanthropy, organizations, corporations and individuals to fight threats to health and safety.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 61% of NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 145 grants below total $15,147,247 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $17,146,612 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,999,365 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $30k
- $10k–50k42 grants · $1.2M
- $50k–250k92 grants · $9.4M
- $250k+7 grants · $4.5M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION | $1,073,204 |
| CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION | $1,044,115 |
| CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION | $700,000 |
| CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION | $545,672 |
| CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION | $495,098 |
| TRUTH INITIATIVE FOUNDATION | $367,722 |
| CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION | $285,967 |
| ACTION FOR HEALTHY KIDS | $244,000 |
| CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION | $227,506 |
| CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION | $210,255 |
| CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION | $194,923 |
| OKLAHOMA ALLIANCE OF YMCAS INC | $188,179 |
| SEATTLE INDIAN HEALTH BOARD | $177,262 |
| NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR CHILDRENS HEALTH QUALITY INC (NICHQ) | $176,512 |
| CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION | $163,170 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $12.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $1.9M on the FY2025 return
Schedule F, as filed: 6 regions, $1.8M to organizations and $105k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: DATA FOR HEALTH · MONITORING THE GLOBAL TOBACCO EPIDEMIC · SCHOLARSHIPS AT STAREHE GIRLS' CENTRE AND SCHOOL
Stated purpose: DATA FOR HEALTH · MONITORING THE GLOBAL TOBACCO EPIDEMIC · ROTAVIRUS VACCINE EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY
Stated purpose: MONITORING THE GLOBAL TOBACCO EPIDEMIC
Stated purpose: MONITORING THE GLOBAL TOBACCO EPIDEMIC
Stated purpose: DATA FOR HEALTH
Stated purpose: GLOBAL COMPASSION FUND FOR LOCALLY EMPLOYED STAFF
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +11% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
219 repeat relationships — 56 still active in FY2025, 163 since wound down; 52 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.7M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ANALASKA NATIVE TRIBAL HEALTH CONSORTIUM3× · 2021–2023 · $2.1M · revenue +29%
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY3× · 2022–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +53%- PAPan American Health Service Inc3× · 2022–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +40% · 89% of their budget
Funded once
- CHChildren's Hospital Corporationone grant, 2024 · $1.6M · revenue 0%
- AFADVOCATES FOR THE AGING OF FREDERICK MD INCone grant, 2021 · $1.2M · revenue +15%
- TPTHE PUBLIC GOOD PROJECTS INCone grant, 2024 · $414k · revenue +3%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To strengthen the resilience and hope of our diverse community members by improving their health and well-being.
To improve personal and community health and wellness within the african community by increasing the availability of culturally relevant physical and mental health services.
CommonHealth ACTION develops people and organizations to produce health through equitable policies, programs, and practices.
We serve communities by embracing the strengths and experiences of individuals and families, engaging them to achieve health and well-being.
The mission of the national coalition on health care (nchc) is to support research and analysis, develop and promote policy solutions, build consensus, and engage the public in order to ensure that america has a high quality health system…
The national nurse-led care consortium (nncc) strives to advance nurse-led healthcare through policy, consultation, and programs to reduce health disparities and meet people's primary care and wellness needs.
Neighborhealth's mission is to promote and sustain healthy communities, families, and individuals by providing accessible, person-centered, and compassionate, high-quality health care services to all who live and work in our service area,…
The mission of ccuih is to facilitate shared development resources for our members and to raise public awareness in order to support a health and wellness network that meets the needs of american indians living in urban communities in…
See schedule oto serve the public by:- assuring the qualifications of health care professionals- providing primary-source verification of credentials of health careprofessionals, as they serve throughout the world- supporting international…
To promote health equity by advocating for public policies and sufficient resources to address the health needs of communities of color.
Our mission is to provide universal access to excellent primary health care for patients of all ages, stages of life, and backgrounds.
To define, promote, and improve access to healthcare services and supports for people living with HIV/AIDS and/or viral hepatitis through advocacy, education, and networking. These services must be affordable to the people who need them…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Montgomery Area Community Wellness Coalition and the most unlike its peers is Fannie E Rippel Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
471 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 471 of the 563 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ALASKA NATIVE TRIBAL HEALTH CONSORTIUM ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
- Who funds Pan American Health Service Inc ↗
- Who funds Emory University ↗
- Who funds ADVOCATES FOR THE AGING OF FREDERICK MD INC ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC HEALTH LABORATORIES INC ↗
- Who funds ABLE SOUTH CAROLINA INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL OPINION RESEARCH CENTER ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Black Mamas Matter Alliance Inc ↗
- Who funds DE BEAUMONT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION OF STATE AND TERRITORIAL HEALTH OFFICIALS ↗
- Who funds THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds HEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds TRUTH INITIATIVE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Civic Heart Community Services ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds COPAL-EDUCATION FUND COMMUNIDADES ORGANIZANDO EL PODER Y LA A ↗
- Who funds ALCONA CITIZENS FOR HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE ↗
- Who funds LATIN AMERICAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Institute for the Advancement of Minority Health ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MONTGOMERY AREA COMMUNITY WELLNESS COALITION ↗
- Who funds AMERICA'S WARRIOR PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds TRUST FOR AMERICAS HEALTH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: AIDS United · Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists Inc · National Council on Aging Inc · National Network of Public Health Institutes Inc · Elton John AIDS Foundation Inc · Association of State and Territorial Health Officials · Emory University · Community Catalyst Inc · De Beaumont Foundation Inc · Association of Public Health Laboratories Inc · American Public Health Association · Public Health Institute
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization National Foundation for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- National Institute for Children's Health Quality Inc — 100% of income from government
- Big Cities Health Coalition Inc — 100% of income from government
- International Association for Indigenous Aging — 100% of income from government
- Southern Plains Tribal Health Board Foundation — 83% of income from government
- Jhpiego Corporation — 65% of income from government
- Association of Immunization Managers — 52% of income from government
- Health Resources in Action Inc — 39% of income from government
- La Colaborativa Inc — 34% of income from government
- Latin American Community Center Inc — 34% of income from government
- Maryland Association of Non-Profit Organizations — 27% of income from government
- Health Equity Solutions Inc — 14% of income from government
- Unconditional Love Inc — 12% of income from government
- United Way of Coastal and Western Connecticut Inc — 11% of income from government
- Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
- Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
- Fusion Partnership Inc — 3% of income from government
- Literacy Volunteers of Greater Hartford Inc — 0% of income from government
- Can Community Health Inc — 0% of income from government
- Association of Public Health Laboratories Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.