· Public charity
National Coalition for Asian Pacific American Community Development
National CAPACD advances equity and creates vibrant, healthy neighborhoods by mobilizing and strengthening a powerful coalition of community-based organizations working in low-income Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander (AA and NHPI) communities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 53 grants below total $3,599,991 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,813,356 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $213,365 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $11k
- $10k–50k36 grants · $676k
- $50k–250k13 grants · $997k
- $250k+2 grants · $1.9M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Our Neighborhoods Capital Fund | $1,550,000 |
| Fresno Interdenominational Refugee Ministries | $364,999 |
| Korean Resource Center | $155,270 |
| Hawaiian Community Assets | $101,978 |
| Asian Law Alliance | $100,994 |
| Chinese Community Center | $88,735 |
| Hana Center | $74,620 |
| Chinese American Service League | $74,260 |
| Chhaya Community Development Corporation | $64,639 |
| Asian Community Development Corporation | $64,104 |
| Asian Services In Action | $57,769 |
| Council for Native Hawaiian Advancement | $56,000 |
| Union of Pan Asian Communities | $55,981 |
| Philadelphia Chinatown Development Corporation | $52,875 |
| Lao Assistance Center of Minnesota | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $4.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
87 repeat relationships — 44 still active in FY2024, 43 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.7M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FIFRESNO INTERDENOMINATIONAL REFUGEE MINISTRIES7× · 2018–2024 · $989k · revenue +249%
- ASASIAN SERVICES IN ACTION INC8× · 2017–2024 · $790k · revenue +66%
- CCCHHAYA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION8× · 2017–2024 · $771k · revenue +399%
Funded once
- CCCHINESE COMMUNITY CENTER INCone grant, 2017 · $80k · revenue +17%
- CECARRIBEAN EQUALITY PROJECT INCone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +17%
- UTUNITED TERRITORIES OF PACIFIC ISLANDERS WASHINGTON-UTOPIA WAone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +1%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Asians for Collective Action (ACA) harnesses the strenghts of Asians and Asian Americans to drive systemic change to create a just, healthy, and thriving community for all.
The Asian Law Caucus's mission is to promote, advance, and represent the legal and civil rights of Asian American Pacific Islander (AAPI) communities, recognizing that social, economic, political and racial inequalities continue to exist…
Aapi equity alliance is a coalition of community-based organizations that advocates for the rights and needs of the asian and pacific islander (api) community in the greater los angeles area, with particular focus on low-income, immigrant,…
Asian Immigrant Women Advocates empowers low-income, limited English speaking immigrant women and youth through education, leadership development and civic participation programs.
AAPIP expands and mobilizes resources for AAPI communities to build a more just and equitable society.
ACL Spokane centers the power of Asians & Asian Americans build a just, healthy, and thriving community for all.
Asian Pacific Community Counseling, Inc., promotes the mental health and wellness of Asian and Pacific Islander communities through culturally and linguistically relevant outreach, prevention, education, therapy, counseling and recovery…
Advancing the AANHPI communities through increased leadership and civic engagement.
CAA is a community-based civil rights organization that conducts community service, policy advocacy, and movement building activities.
Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Atlanta's mission is to protect and promote the civil and human rights of Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders in Georgia and the Southeast through policy advocacy, legal services,…
Asian Pacific Health Care Venture, Inc. is a family of community health centers whose mission is to be the medical home for our patients by providing personalized, quality health care services in a culturally accessible manner.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chinese-American Planning Council Inc and the most unlike its peers is Carribean Equality Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 11% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
111 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 111 of the 116 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Our Neighborhoods Capital Fund ↗
- Who funds Korean Resource Center Inc ↗
- Who funds FRESNO INTERDENOMINATIONAL REFUGEE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds ASIAN SERVICES IN ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds CHHAYA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds ASIAN RESOURCES INC ↗
- Who funds CHINESE AMERICAN SERVICE LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds Center for Pan Asian Community Services ↗
- Who funds THE HANA CENTER ↗
- Who funds SANTA CLARA COUNTY ASIAN LAW ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds ASIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds UNION OF PAN ASIAN COMMUNITIES ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA CHINATOWN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds HAWAIIAN COMMUNITY ASSETS INC ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL FOR NATIVE HAWAIIAN ADVANCEMENT ↗
- Who funds Lao Assistance Center of Minnesota ↗
- Who funds RENAISSANCE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds ASIAN PACIFIC ISLANDER SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR MULTICULTURAL COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds INTERIM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds CAPI USA ↗
- Who funds ASIAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds APANO COMMUNITIES UNITED FUND ↗
- Who funds KHMER GIRLS IN ACTION ↗
- Who funds COALITION FOR A BETTER CHINESE AMERICAN COMMUNITY CBCAC ↗
- Who funds UNITED CAMBODIAN COMMUNITY INC ↗
- Who funds BOAT PEOPLE S O S INC ↗
- Who funds ASIAN-AMERICAN HOMEOWNERSHIP COUNSELING INC ↗
- Who funds HMONG AMERICAN PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HELP CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WHITE CENTER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF LITTLE SAIGON ↗
- Who funds ASIAN AMERICAN RESOURCE WORKSHOP INC ↗
- Who funds PACIFIC ASIAN CONSORTIUM IN EMPLOYMENT ↗
- Who funds CHINESE COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE CAMBODIAN FAMILY ↗
- Who funds ASIAN INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Gofundmeorg · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Asian Americans Advancing Justice Southern California · Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Aajc Inc · The Asian American Foundation · Immigrant Legal Resource Center · New Venture Fund · Asian & Pacific Islander American Health Forum · Tides Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The California Endowment · Southeast Asia Resource Action Center Searac
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization National Coalition for Asian Pacific American Community Development funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Boston Chinatown Neighborhood Center Inc — 38% of income from government
- Ka Aha Lahui O Olekona — 27% of income from government
- Micronesian Islander Community — 25% of income from government
- Asian Community Development Corporation — 2% of income from government
- Asian American Resource Workshop Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.