Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Usaging

USAGING represents & supports the national network of area agencies on aging & advocates for the title vi native american aging programs that help older adults & people with disabilities live with optimal health, well-being, independence & dignity in their homes & communities.

$20M
Granted FY2024still arriving
185
Grants FY2024still arriving
42
States reached
$961k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.

Human Services$41MHealth$16MCivil Rights$5.0MRecreation & Sports$1.4MArts & Culture$1.4MHousing & Shelter$1.2MFood & Nutrition$856kEducation$659kOther$0
02FY2024 · 185 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k18 grants · $134k
  • $10k–50k53 grants · $1.3M
  • $50k–250k95 grants · $12M
  • $250k+19 grants · $8.6M
$69,999
Median grant
42
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DISABILITY ADVOCACY CENTER$961,300
AUTISM SOCIETY OF AMERICA$721,602
USA BOXING INC$671,489
SOUTHEASTERN ILLINOIS AREA AGENCY ON AGING$520,720
VERMONT CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING$510,929
DISABILITY RIGHTS FLORIDA$476,640
AGESPAN (MASS HOME CARE)$474,498
AGING & LONG-TERM CARE OF EASTERN WASHINGTON$462,300
HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER$443,064
NOHONA HEALTH INC$395,975
SANFORD HEALTH$378,387
CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING OF SOUTH CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA$373,860
MISSOURI ASSOCIATIONOF AREA AGENCIES ON AGING$362,208
COALITION FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING OPTIONS INC$335,250
CONNECTIONS AREA AGENCY ON AGING INC$321,474
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $16.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 72% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AREA AGENCY ON AGING OF REGION ONE: $144k → 11%PIMA COUNCIL ON AGING (SOUTHWEST COMMUNITY CARE PARTNERS): $167k → 15%THE LATINO HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM INC: $158k → 8%CNETER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING OF NORTH CENTRAL PA: $150k → 12%CENTER FOR INDEPENDENCE OF INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES: $113k → 7%CENTER FOR INDEPENDENCE OF THE DISABLED IN NY: $203k → 17%TEXAS HEALTHY AT HOME: $167k → 11%ABLE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING: $150k → 16%DOCSERVICES: $235k → 20%AREA AGENCY ON AGING OF PASCO - PINELLAS: $224k → 12%LIVING INDEPENDENTLY FOR TODAY & TOMORROW: $627k → 11%CONNECTIONS AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $594k → 12%UPCAP SERVICES: $115k → 13%REGION VII AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $158k → 14%SHACKLE FREE COMMUNITY OUTREACH AGENCY: $492k → 20%AGING & IN-HOME SERVICE OF NORTHEAST INDIANA: $900k → 12%REAL SERVICES INC: $255k → 13%DIRECTION HOME AKRON CANTON AAAA: $174k → 13%WESTERN RESERVE AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $750k → 17%PENINSULA AGENCY ON AGING: $138k → 17%AGEWELL INC (VERMONT AGING NETWORK CONSORTIUM): $164k → 10%SOUTHERN MAINE AGENCY ON AGING: $660k → 9%CENTRAL MAINE AREA AGENCY ON AGING (HEALTHY LIVING FOR ME): $313k → 12%AREA AGENCY ON AGING OF REGION ONE: $120k → 11%THE LATINO HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM INC: $108k → 8%AGESPAN (MASS HOME CARE): $474k → 10%AMERICAN SOCIETY ON AGING: $125k → 10%DOCSERVICES: $142k → 20%AREA AGENCY ON AGING OF PASCO - PINELLAS: $224k → 12%CONNECTIONS AREA AGENCY ON AGING INC: $461k → 12%SHACKLE FREE COMMUNITY OUTREACH AGENCY: $148k → 20%ROSALYNN CARTER INSTITUTE FOR CAREGIVERS INC: $135k → 22%AGING & IN-HOME SERVICE OF NORTHEAST INDIANA: $169k → 12%REAL SERVICES INC: $204k → 13%WESTERN RESERVE AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $108k → 17%AREA OFFICE OF AGING OF NORTHWESTERN OHIO: $110k → 18%ADVANCING STATES: $225k → 7%SOUTHERN MAINE AGENCY ON AGING: $248k → 9%ELDER SERVICES OF THE MERRIMACK VALLEY: $110k → 10%CONNECTIONS AREA AGENCY ON AGING INC: $321k → 12%SOUTHEASTERN WAKE ADULT DAY CENTER INC: $516k → 8%ADVANCING STATES: $147k → 7%ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY CENTERS ON DISABILITIES: $442k → 8%AGEOPTIONS: $269k → 14%AGEOPTIONS: $203k → 14%MOUNTING HORIZONS INC: $181k → 16%SERVICE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIFE: $117k → 14%DISABLED RESOURCES CENTER INC: $112k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$55M · 151 repeat orgs$15M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

151 repeat relationships — 136 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 47 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

151
58

Total granted

$55M
$10.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+14%

Still filing today

74%
72%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthCivil RightsHousing & ShelterEducationPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AS
    AUTISM SOCIETY OF AMERICA INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $4.4M · revenue +3% · 64% of their budget
  • CF
    COALITION FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING OPTIONS INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +38% · 50% of their budget
  • DR
    DISABILITY RIGHTS TEXAS
    2× · 2023–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • AM
    ASIAN MEDIA ACCESS
    one grant, 2023 · $1.4M
  • T
    TogetherAustin
    one grant, 2023 · $987k · revenue -55%
  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA
    one grant, 2023 · $969k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Area Agency On Aging of Western Michigan Inc

Through internal expertise, external partnerships, and advocacy, the area agency on aging of western michigan provides older adults, adults with disabilities, and their caregivers equitable access to services that promote independence and…

Human Services
2
Central Missouri Area Agency On Aging

Aging Best's mission is to help people be as independent as possible as they navigate through life by delivering the best support, services, and programs.

Human Services
3
Seniorage Area Agency On Aging

A federally designated Area Agency on Aging whose mission is to bring independence enhancing supportive services to the 60+ population and their caregivers in our 17 county-wide service area.

Human Services
4
Alliance of Disability Advocates

To serve all north carolinians with significant disabilities by ensuring they can live independently in a barrier-free community of their choice through consumer-controlled, self-directed services.

Religion
5
Accessability Ctr for Independent Living

Accessability center for independent living, inc was organized to provide counseling, training, and advocacy services which assist people with disability to live and function independently.

—
6
Achieving Independence and Mobility Cil

Independent living services for persons with disabilities.

Human Services
7
Maine Council on Aging

A broad multi-disciplinary network that works to ensure we can all live healthy, engaged, and secure lives as we age in our homes and communities. With the voices of people with lived experience, we work on policy issues related to…

Unclassified
8
Colorado Springs Independence Center

We work with people with disabilities, their families and the community to create independence so that all may thrive.

Human Services
9
Area 1 Agency On Aging

Area 1 agency on aging provides leadership and services that support and promote healthy aging.

Human Services
10
Ageguide Northeastern Illinois Area On Aging

We strive to make aging easier through the development of a network of services for older persons designed to optimize the quality of their lives.

Food & Nutrition
11
Aging and Community Services of South Central Indiana Inc

Working together, our mission is to enhance the quality of life in our communities, generation through generation to assist older adults, persons with disabilities, and persons that have needs, to access opportunities that will allow them…

Human Services
12
Central Illinois Agency On Aging Inc

Central illinois agency on aging believes in the independence and dignity of older persons, and that each older person should be empowered to exert control over their own life & have access to needed services. we do planning, program…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Meals On Wheels America and the most unlike its peers is Pabneeg. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyDevelopmental Disabilities …Youth Sports ProgramsUnited Way AffiliatesImmigrant Worker SupportPolicy Research and AdvocacyLgbtq+ Community SupportCommunity College Foundatio…Faith-Based Social ServicesWomen & Girls Leadership De…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Jewish Community Organizati…Affordable Housing Developm…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Health Access Advocacy and …Senior Support ServicesCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr16%20%20–35yr13%51%35–55yr16%7%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%6%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr16%20%20–35yr13%56%35–55yr16%5%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.4%1/267
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,298

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

201 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 201 of the 258 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

14
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
19
Early backer (in before they grew)
197/201
Grantees still filing
132/201
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AUTISM SOCIETY OF AMERICA INC — $4,351,023 · OtherAUTISM SOCIETY OF AMERICA INCAmerican Society of Consultant Pharmacists Foundation — $1,383,000 · OtherASIAN MEDIA ACCESS — $1,350,000 · Other+96 more — $27,606,235 · Other+96 moreCONNECTIONS AREA AGENCY ON AGING — $1,376,754 · Human ServicesCONNECTIONS AREA AGENCY ON…AGING AND IN-HOME SERVICES OF NORTHEAST INDIANA INC — $1,069,019 · Human ServicesAGING AND IN-HOME SERVICES…Southern Maine Agency on Aging — $908,032 · Human ServicesSouthern Maine Agency on A…WESTERN RESERVE AREA AGENCY ON AGING — $858,033 · Human ServicesWESTERN RESERVE AREA AGENC…AGESPAN INC — $799,476 · Human ServicesLIVING INDEPENDENTLY FOR TODAY AND TOMORROW INC — $696,540 · Human ServicesSHACKLE FREE COMMUNITY OUTREACH AGENCY INC — $640,950 · Human ServicesSOUTHEASTERN WAKE ADULT DAY CENTER — $573,182 · Human Services+52 more — $9,141,495 · Human Services+52 moreCOALITION FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING OPTIONS INC — $1,962,500 · HealthCOALITION F…Memorial Hermann Health System — $702,188 · HealthMemorial He…PARTNERS IN CARE FOUNDATION — $686,049 · HealthPARTNERS IN…TIRR Foundation — $439,726 · HealthTIRR Founda…DESERT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION — $307,483 · HealthValley Association for Independent Living — $287,500 · HealthCOALITION FOR BARRIER FREE LIVING — $249,999 · HealthIMMUNIZE NEVADA — $238,351 · HealthBUCKS COUNTY HEALTH IMPROVEMENT PARTNERS — $228,673 · Health+13 more — $1,754,284 · Health+13 moreDISABILITY ADVOCACY CENTER — $1,822,600 · Civil RightsDISABILITY RIGHTS TEXAS — $1,500,000 · Civil RightsDISABILITY RIGHTS FLORIDA INC — $953,280 · Civil RightsDISABILITY RIGHTS CALIFORNIA — $275,625 · Civil RightsPROGRESSIVE INDEPENDENCE INC — $200,039 · Civil RightsDISABILITY RIGHTS OF PENNSYLVANIA — $187,920 · Civil Rights+1 more — $95,400 · Civil RightsTogetherAustin — $987,390 · EducationRESOURCES FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING INC — $569,734 · EducationALLIANCE FOR DISABLED IN ACTION INC — $121,500 · EducationGEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $111,650 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $75,959 · EducationOlder Adults Technology Services — $71,250 · EducationVERMONT CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING INC — $1,021,858 · Housing & ShelterFuture Choices Inc — $512,640 · Housing & ShelterDISABILITY RESOURCE CENTER INC — $137,808 · Housing & ShelterVillage to Village Network Inc — $135,194 · Housing & ShelterUSA BOXING INC — $1,374,614 · Recreation & SportsSOUTHEASTERN VIRGINIA AREAWIDE MODEL PROGRAM INC — $100,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$34,690,258Human Services$16,063,481Health$6,856,753Civil Rights$5,034,864Education$1,937,483Housing & Shelter$1,807,500Recreation & Sports$1,474,614

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAUTISM SOCIETY OF AMERICA INC — $4,351,023 over 2y, 64% of budgetCOALITION FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING OPTIONS INC — $1,962,500 over 2y, 50% of budgetDISABILITY RIGHTS TEXAS — $1,500,000 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetAmerican Society of Consultant Pharmacists Foundation — $1,383,000 over 2y, 61% of budgetCONNECTIONS AREA AGENCY ON AGING — $1,376,754 over 3y, 6.4% of budgetUSA BOXING INC — $1,374,614 over 2y, 7.5% of budgetAGING AND IN-HOME SERVICES OF NORTHEAST INDIANA INC — $1,069,019 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetSOUTHEASTERN ILLINOIS AGENCY ON AGING — $1,041,440 over 2y, 15% of budgetVERMONT CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING INC — $1,021,858 over 2y, 15% of budgetDISABILITY RIGHTS FLORIDA INC — $953,280 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetSouthern Maine Agency on Aging — $908,032 over 2y, 9.9% of budgetMAC INCORPORATED — $887,200 over 2y, 8.4% of budgetSENIOR CONNECTIONS INC — $858,600 over 1y, 14% of budgetWESTERN RESERVE AREA AGENCY ON AGING — $858,033 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMISSOURI ASSOCIATION OF AREA AGENCIES ON AGING — $814,968 over 2y, 20% of budgetAGESPAN INC — $799,476 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetPSA 3 AGENCY ON AGING — $767,520 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetMemorial Hermann Health System — $702,188 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIVING INDEPENDENTLY FOR TODAY AND TOMORROW INC — $696,540 over 2y, 18% of budgetNATIONAL GRANGE OF THE ORDER OF PATRONS OF HUSBANDRY — $695,200 over 2y, 21% of budgetPARTNERS IN CARE FOUNDATION — $686,049 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetOHIO DISTRICT 5 AREA AGENCY ON AGING INC — $647,850 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF NUTRITION & AGING SERVICES PROGRAMS — $646,439 over 2y, 51% of budgetSHACKLE FREE COMMUNITY OUTREACH AGENCY INC — $640,950 over 2y, 25% of budgetCENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING — $616,185 over 2y, 59% of budgetAREA AGENCY ON AGING DISTRICT 7 INC — $589,680 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSOUTHEASTERN WAKE ADULT DAY CENTER — $573,182 over 2y, 35% of budgetRESOURCES FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING INC — $569,734 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetFuture Choices Inc — $512,640 over 2y, 39% of budgetEl Buen Samaritano Episcopal Mission — $486,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetAGEOPTIONS INC (FKA SUBURBAN AREA AGENCY ON AGING) — $472,125 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY CENTERS ON DISABILITIES — $467,053 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetREAL SERVICES INC — $459,648 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetAREA AGENCY ON AGING OF PASCO-PINELLAS INC — $447,360 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI — $446,226 over 2y, 16% of budgetTIRR Foundation — $439,726 over 5y, 9.3% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY ON AGING — $404,997 over 7y, 3.9% of budgetDOCSERVIES INC — $377,257 over 2y, 12% of budgetENDEPENDENCE CENTER OF NORTHERN VA — $375,594 over 2y, 13% of budgetADvancing States Inc — $371,875 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetUNITED WAY FOX CITIES INC — $370,040 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetBALTIMORE CIVIC FUND INC — $347,500 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetSPECTRUM GENERATIONS — $312,875 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetDESERT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION — $307,483 over 2y, 13% of budgetSOUTHEAST ASIA RESOURCE ACTION CENTER SEARAC — $302,322 over 2y, 6.8% of budgetINDEPENDENT LIVING RESOURCES OF GREATER BIRMINGHAM — $302,046 over 2y, 7.4% of budgetEAST TENNESSEE HUMAN RESOURCE AGENCY INC — $300,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetValley Association for Independent Living — $287,500 over 2y, 11% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Council on A…Meals on Wheels Ameri…AARP FoundationCwi Works IncNextfifty InitiativePublic Health Institu…Pharmaceutical Resear…AARPThe Scan FoundationCalifornia Foundation…American Association …The John a Hartford F…
National Council on Aging IncVA79.9× affinity45 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Council on Aging Inc · Meals on Wheels America · AARP Foundation · Cwi Works Inc · Nextfifty Initiative · Public Health Institute · Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America · AARP · The Scan Foundation · California Foundation for Independent Living Centers · American Association of People With Disabilities · The John a Hartford Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Usaging funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Disability Rights Oregon — 84% of income from government
  • Disability Rights Florida Inc — 79% of income from government
  • Agespan Inc — 57% of income from government
  • Agency On Aging of South Central Connecticut — 55% of income from government
  • Senior Connections Inc — 52% of income from government
  • Disability Resource Center Inc — 38% of income from government
  • Center for Independent Living of Nw Fl Inc — 35% of income from government
  • Association of University Centers On Disabilities — 34% of income from government
  • Vermont Center for Independent Living Inc — 29% of income from government
  • Resources for Independent Living Inc — 11% of income from government
  • Autism Society of America Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Coalition for Independent Living Options Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Ride Connection Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Area Agency On Aging of Pasco-Pinellas Inc — 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
55report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
5rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 258 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home