Skip to content

Ohio · Nonprofit

PSA 3 AGENCY ON AGING

PSA 3 AGENCY ON AGING (Ohio) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,197,836 to it, the largest being USAGING ($867,698). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$38M
Funders on record
4
Grants received
$1.2M
Net assets
$2.3M
4/4 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 3%
01What it does

What Psa 3 Agency on Aging does

Mission

To promote the highest quality of life, area agency on aging 3 will provide access to a network of services, education, and advocacy as the region's aging and disability resource expert.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Passport home care & assisted living medicaid waiver program - utilize state and federal medicaid funds to operate and provide home and community based services to the elderly to delay/deter nursing facility placement. Provide services to the disabled and elderly for assisted living expenses.

    $27,181,585 spentof which $116,105 as grants$60,548 earned by the program
    79% of program spending
  2. Title iii services of the older americans act: federally funded supportive services to elderly including socialization, transportation, nutrition, caregiver support information & referral, chores, etc.

    $2,261,855 spent$22,484 earned by the program
    7% of program spending
  3. Other program services: the other program services that are provided to older adults through Psa 3 Agency on Aging's contracted service providers include: daily meal programs, day care, home making/personal care, health screening, transportation, escort, chore, home repair, case management, and care coordination program. The care coordination program is designed to link home care services to those vulnerable older adults who are at risk of losing their independence due to having multiple problems with daily living tasks and skills.

    $5,071,330 spent$123,621 earned by the program
    15% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $34,514,770.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($18M) Expenses 100 ($18M) Net assets 100 ($416k)2018 Revenue 100 ($18M) Expenses 97 ($17M) Net assets 159 ($661k)2019 Revenue 94 ($17M) Expenses 101 ($18M) Net assets -181 ($-751749)2020 Revenue 120 ($21M) Expenses 114 ($20M) Net assets 395 ($1.6M)2021 Revenue 124 ($22M) Expenses 124 ($22M) Net assets 537 ($2.2M)2022 Revenue 129 ($23M) Expenses 130 ($23M) Net assets 474 ($2.0M)2023 Revenue 136 ($24M) Expenses 134 ($24M) Net assets 522 ($2.2M)2024 Revenue 217 ($38M) Expenses 214 ($38M) Net assets 564 ($2.3M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (217)Expenses (214)Net assets (564)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $2.7M to $23M (+739%).

$2.3M
$3.5M
$2.7M
$23M
$4.9M
$7.4M
$8.0M
$9.0M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 100% · 2018 99% · 2019 99% · 2020 99% · 2021 99% · 2022 99% · 2023 98% · 2024 98%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−$188k
’17
$245k
’18
−$1.4M
’19
$848k
’20
−$159k
’21
−$263k
’22
$211k
’23
$173k
’24
1.0
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Jacquelyn Lucke

Executive director

Board chair

Kris Schroeder

Chairman

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2020 and FY2021 filings.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed1210121211131112
Joined·+2+4+1+1+3+1+3
No longer listed·4212132
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 3 funders, grant income rose $55k → $719k.

Funder
'17
'18
'19
'21
'22
'23
'24*
'25*
total
Usagingunclassified
$868k
funders
2
2
1
2
1
3
4
3

From the IRS filings of PSA 3 AGENCY ON AGING’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

PSA 3 AGENCY ON AGING leans on a few funders — its largest provides 72% of grant income and the top three 94%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund PSA 3 AGENCY ON AGING.

72%
largest funder
94%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 86% · 2018 77% · 2019 100% · 2021 100% · 2023 96% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

PSA 3 AGENCY ON AGING draws 82% of its grant income from funders outside Ohio, across 3 states in all.

OH
VA
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’21
’23
Ohio out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Government funding PSA 3 AGENCY ON AGING receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $1.4M on record.

Federal$1.4M
grants $1.4Mcontracts $0
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Top agencies
  • Corporation for National and Community Service$1.4M

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like PSA 3 AGENCY ON AGING

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Ohio

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

90% of spending goes to programs.

Program 90%Management 10%Fundraising 0%

Governance

9
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • Area Agency on Aging 3 Foundation Dba Silver Birch Foundation · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for PSA 3 AGENCY ON AGING: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds PSA 3 AGENCY ON AGING?
PSA 3 AGENCY ON AGING (Ohio) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,197,836 to it, the largest being USAGING ($867,698). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does PSA 3 AGENCY ON AGING have?
IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $1,197,836 in grants to PSA 3 AGENCY ON AGING, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of PSA 3 AGENCY ON AGING?
USAGING is the largest funder on record, with $867,698 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like PSA 3 AGENCY ON AGING find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Ohio. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 4 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing