Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Habitat for Humanity International Inc

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope.

$155M
Granted FY2025still arriving
699
Grants FY2025still arriving
51
States reached
$2.8M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Housing & Shelter$496MHealth$839kHuman Services$340kArts & Culture$94kReligion$25k
02FY2025 · 699 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 699 grants below total $70,097,349 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $155,410,228 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $85,312,879 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k178 grants · $775k
  • $10k–50k252 grants · $6.6M
  • $50k–250k204 grants · $23M
  • $250k+65 grants · $40M
$30,725
Median grant
51
States reached
$760M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TWIN CITIES HFH (MN)$2,816,563
EAST BAYSILICON VALLEY HFH (CA)$1,939,887
GREATER LOS ANGELES HFH$1,803,683
CLEVELAND HFH GREATER (OH)$1,453,385
PUERTO RICO HFH$1,424,001
CENTRAL ARIZONA HFH (AZ)$1,303,239
CHARLOTTE REGION HFH OF THE (NC)$1,286,477
NEW YORK CITY HFH (NY)$1,232,347
WASHINGTON DC HFH OF (DC)$1,109,423
HFH SEATTLE-KING COUNTY$1,095,707
FORT WORTH AREA HFH (TX)$1,077,935
METRO MARYLAND HFH (MD)$787,157
SAN FRANCISCO HFH GREATER (CA)$780,523
HOUSTON HFH (TX)$770,691
CHICAGO HFH$696,564
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 72% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CENTRAL ARIZONA HFH (AZ): $1.3M → 11%TWIN CITIES HFH (MN): $2.8M → 14%EAST BAYSILICON VALLEY HFH (CA): $2.0M → 9%NEW YORK CITY HFH (NY): $1.2M → 17%FORT WORTH AREA HFH (TX): $1.1M → 11%WASHINGTON DC HFH OF (DC): $1.1M → 14%Collier County Hfh Of (Fl): $2.0M → 10%NASHVILLE HFH OF GREATER (TN): $1.1M → 11%Nashville Hfh Of Greater (Tn): $1.1M → 14%CHARLOTTE REGION HFH OF THE (NC): $2.5M → 10%METRO DENVER HFH: $948k → 8%Metro Denver HFH of: $1.0M → 12%CLEVELAND HFH GREATER (OH): $1.5M → 17%HFH SEATTLE-KING COUNTY: $3.1M → 9%BROOKINGS AREA HFH (SD): $1.1M → 13%TWIN CITIES HFH (MN): $1.8M → 14%EAST BAYSILICON VALLEY HFH (CA): $1.9M → 9%GREATER LOS ANGELES HFH: $1.9M → 14%NEW YORK CITY HFH (NY): $1.0M → 17%HOUSTON HFH (TX): $1.2M → 16%COLLIER COUNTY HFH OF (FL): $1.2M → 10%CHARLOTTE REGION HFH OF THE (NC): $1.3M → 10%BELLEVUE HABITAT STORE: $1.1M → 9%TWIN CITIES HFH (MN): $1.6M → 14%EAST BAYSILICON VALLEY HFH (CA): $1.7M → 9%GREATER LOS ANGELES HFH: $1.8M → 14%Nashville Hfh Of Greater (Tn): $979k → 14%CHARLOTTE REGION HFH OF THE (NC): $970k → 10%HFH SEATTLE-KING COUNTY: $1.1M → 9%TWIN CITIES HFH (MN): $1.5M → 14%EAST BAYSILICON VALLEY HFH (CA): $1.6M → 9%GREATER LOS ANGELES HFH: $1.7M → 14%CHARLOTTE REGION HFH OF THE (NC): $948k → 10%HFH SEATTLE-KING COUNTY: $978k → 9%TWIN CITIES HFH (MN): $1.4M → 14%EAST BAYSILICON VALLEY HFH (CA): $1.4M → 9%GREATER LOS ANGELES HFH: $1.6M → 14%PORTLAND-METRO EAST HFH: $1.2M → 12%Twin Cities HFH: $1.1M → 14%GREATER LOS ANGELES HFH: $1.6M → 14%PORTLAND-METRO EAST HFH: $1.1M → 12%Twin Cities Hfh (Mn): $1.0M → 14%GREATER LOS ANGELES HFH: $1.6M → 14%Los Angeles HFH of Greater: $1.3M → 14%Habitat Micro Build India Housing: $3.9M → 14%Los Angeles Restore- Bellflower Hfh Of: $1.3M → 14%Charlotte ReStore - University City Hfh Of: $1.0M → 10%Los Angeles HFH of Greater: $1.2M → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region — $51M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 9 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Central America and the Caribbean$13M · 25% · 8 grants

Stated purpose: AFFORDABLE HOUSING

Sub-Saharan Africa$11M · 22% · 10 grants

Stated purpose: AFFORDABLE HOUSING

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$8.6M · 17% · 10 grants

Stated purpose: AFFORDABLE HOUSING

East Asia and the Pacific$8.5M · 16% · 12 grants

Stated purpose: AFFORDABLE HOUSING

South Asia$4.1M · 8% · 5 grants

Stated purpose: AFFORDABLE HOUSING

South America$3.1M · 6% · 6 grants

Stated purpose: AFFORDABLE HOUSING

North America (Canada and Mexico)$1.8M · 3% · 7 grants

Stated purpose: AFFORDABLE HOUSING

Middle East and North Africa$965k · 2% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: AFFORDABLE HOUSING

Russia and Neighboring States$238k · 0% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: AFFORDABLE HOUSING

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$492M · 910 repeat orgs$4.5M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

910 repeat relationships — 686 still active in FY2025, 224 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

910
91

Total granted

$492M
$4.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
0%

Still filing today

94%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $78k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Housing & ShelterInternationalCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER LOS ANGELES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $14M · revenue +128%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF PUERTO RICO INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $13M · revenue +249% · 75% of their budget
  • TC
    TWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $13M · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • HM
    Habitat Micro Build India Housing
    one grant, 2017 · $3.9M
  • ED
    El Dorado Habitat for Humanity
    one grant, 2023 · $27k · revenue -45% · 54% of their budget
  • HF
    Habitat for Humanity of Burlington County and Tren
    one grant, 2017 · $27k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Habitat Community Housing Development Inc

Development of affordable housing

—
2
Habitat for Humanity International Inc

To put God's love into action, Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope.

—
3
Habitat for Humanity of Peconic Inc

To sponsor specific construction of modest but adequate housing for working families unable to qualify for traditional mortgages.

—
4
Habitat for Humanity of Fremont County

To help build communities by building and renovating houses for people in need so they have decent homes and communities in which to grow.

—
5
Mahaska County Habitat for Humanity

A nonprofit ecumenical christian housing ministry dedicated to eleminating substandard housing and homelessness worldwide and to making adequate, affordable shelter a matter of conscience and action.

—
6
Habitat for Humanity International Nevada Mo Area

Construct affordable housing and eliminate substandard housing.

—
7
Habitat for Humanity International Inc

Seeking to put God's love in action, Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope for low income families.

—
8
Ottumwa Habitat for Humanity

Construct and sell houses to low income families at cost.

—
9
Habitat for Humanity International Emporia Area

To build and provide adequate housing to qualified familes.

—
10
Habitat for Humanity of Ionia County

The organization's primary activity is the construction, renovation, sale and financing of houses for individuals in need. the organization generates revenue primarily from sales of these homes. the organization also receives donations…

—
11
Habitat for Humanity of North Idaho

Habitat for humanity of north idaho works in partnership with the community to build decent, energy efficient houses for qualified families in kootenai county.

—
12
Habitat Housing Solutions Inc

Habitat housing solutions, inc. is a florida nonprofit corporation founded in august 2013 and is a community housing development organization ("chdo") that builds affordable homes for qualified low-income families in palm beach county.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Habitat for Humanity- Northeast Michigan Inc and the most unlike its peers is Fuller Center for Housing-Ashland- Ironton Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%2%10–20yr16%2%20–35yr13%95%35–55yr16%0%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%1%10–20yr16%5%20–35yr13%94%35–55yr16%0%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%19/1,064
the rest of the field
13%
240,377/1,818,501

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

1022 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

64
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
470
Early backer (in before they grew)
960/1022
Grantees still filing
720/1022
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER LOS ANGELES — $14,124,351 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER LOS ANGELESHABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST BAY SILICON VALLEY — $10,481,967 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST BAY SILICON VALLEY+100 more — $171,686,967 · Housing & Shelter+100 moreHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF PUERTO RICO INC — $13,205,244 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF PUERTO RICO INCTWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $12,897,318 · OtherTWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITYHabitat For Humanity Of The Charlotte Region — $9,591,695 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY SEATTLE-KING COUNTY — $8,518,315 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF METRO DENVER INC — $6,747,065 · Other+93 more — $144,474,849 · Other+93 more
Housing & Shelter$196,293,285Other$195,434,486

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER LOS ANGELES — $14,124,351 over 9y, 6.6% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF PUERTO RICO INC — $13,205,244 over 9y, 75% of budgetTWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $12,897,318 over 9y, 6.8% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST BAY SILICON VALLEY — $10,481,967 over 9y, 9.7% of budgetHabitat For Humanity Of The Charlotte Region — $9,591,695 over 9y, 6.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY SEATTLE-KING COUNTY — $8,518,315 over 9y, 8.5% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF METRO DENVER INC — $6,747,065 over 9y, 4.8% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY NEW YORK CITY AND WESTCHERSTER COUNTY INC — $6,169,444 over 9y, 15% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER NASHVILLE — $6,004,913 over 9y, 5.2% of budgetHouston Habitat for Humanity Inc — $5,649,127 over 9y, 5.5% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY PORTLAND METRO EAST — $5,616,047 over 9y, 4.2% of budgetDallas Area Habitat for Humanity Inc — $5,222,898 over 9y, 5.7% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY CENTRAL ARIZONA — $4,781,175 over 9y, 7.8% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY PHILADELPHIA INC — $4,526,198 over 9y, 13% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of Collier County Inc — $4,396,363 over 9y, 7.8% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $4,379,138 over 9y, 6.5% of budgetFORT WORTH AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $4,355,871 over 9y, 6.7% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY CHICAGO — $4,190,543 over 9y, 15% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY IN ATLANTA INC — $4,140,649 over 9y, 4.4% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY METRO MARYLAND INC — $4,135,042 over 9y, 11% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF OMAHA INC — $4,130,726 over 9y, 4.5% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY GREATER SAN FRANCISCO — $4,067,975 over 9y, 8.8% of budgetSAN DIEGO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $3,856,404 over 9y, 13% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ORANGE COUNTY INC — $3,486,106 over 9y, 7.4% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of Pinellas County Inc & Subsidiaries — $3,411,052 over 9y, 3.3% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY - NORTH CENTRAL GEORGIA INC — $3,408,617 over 9y, 28% of budgetGREATER FOX CITIES AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $3,203,455 over 9y, 5.5% of budgetDUPAGE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $3,086,386 over 9y, 17% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WASHINGTON DC & NORTHERN VIRGINIA INC — $3,038,899 over 9y, 7.6% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY - MIDOHIO — $2,926,167 over 9y, 5.3% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF JEFFERSON COUNTY — $2,901,326 over 9y, 54% of budgetMILWAUKEE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $2,839,201 over 9y, 3.6% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY FLORIDA — $2,738,692 over 9y, 7.3% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER VOLUSIA COUNTY INC — $2,722,587 over 9y, 17% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF NORTHWEST METRO ATLANTA INC — $2,577,812 over 9y, 10% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER INDIANAPOLIS INC — $2,571,357 over 9y, 3.3% of budgetAUSTIN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $2,558,140 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE CHESAPEAKE INC — $2,550,739 over 9y, 4.4% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY GREATER BOSTON INC — $2,487,368 over 9y, 11% of budgetGREATER CHARLOTTESVILLE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $2,461,669 over 9y, 3.4% of budgetGREATER DES MOINES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $2,424,731 over 9y, 3.3% of budgetMORRIS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $2,409,755 over 9y, 5.5% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WAKE COUNTY INC — $2,406,292 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetGOLDEN CRESCENT HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $2,329,358 over 9y, 30% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF BAY COUNTY INC — $2,270,495 over 9y, 28% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF KEY WEST AND LOWER FLORIDA KEYS INC — $2,270,036 over 8y, 22% of budgetCHICAGOLAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY JAMES HARRIS TREASURER — $2,227,720 over 9y, 19% of budgetFAYETTVILLE AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $2,192,132 over 9y, 18% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF PUERTO RICO INC ↗
  • Who funds TWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST BAY SILICON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds Habitat For Humanity Of The Charlotte Region ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY SEATTLE-KING COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF METRO DENVER INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY NEW YORK CITY AND WESTCHERSTER COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER NASHVILLE ↗
  • Who funds Houston Habitat for Humanity Inc ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY PORTLAND METRO EAST ↗
  • Who funds Dallas Area Habitat for Humanity Inc ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CENTRAL ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY PHILADELPHIA INC ↗
  • Who funds Habitat for Humanity of Collier County Inc ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CLEVELAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds FORT WORTH AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY IN ATLANTA INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY METRO MARYLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF OMAHA INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY GREATER SAN FRANCISCO ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ORANGE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas County Inc & Subsidiaries ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - NORTH CENTRAL GEORGIA INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER FOX CITIES AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds DUPAGE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WASHINGTON DC & NORTHERN VIRGINIA INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - MIDOHIO ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF JEFFERSON COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY FLORIDA ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER VOLUSIA COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF NORTHWEST METRO ATLANTA INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER INDIANAPOLIS INC ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE CHESAPEAKE INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY GREATER BOSTON INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Thrivent Financial fo…Habitat for Humanity …Habitat for Humanity …Habitat for Humanity …Habitat for Humanity …Habitat for Humanity …Habitat for Humanity …Habitat for Humanity …Habitat for Humanity …Publix Super Markets …Habitat for Humanity …Habitat For Humanity …
Thrivent Financial for Lutherans-GroupMN106.4× affinity115 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Thrivent Financial for Lutherans-Group · Habitat for Humanity of NC Inc · Habitat for Humanity of Minnesota Inc · Habitat for Humanity of Indiana Inc · Habitat for Humanity South Carolina · Habitat for Humanity of Tn Inc · Habitat for Humanity of Colorado Inc · Habitat for Humanity of Oregon Inc · Habitat for Humanity of Ohio Inc · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · Habitat for Humanity of Florida Inc · Habitat For Humanity Virginia

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Habitat for Humanity International Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Sussex County Habitat for Humanity — 23% of income from government
  • Habitat for Humanity of New Castle County — 21% of income from government
  • Bend-Redmond Habitat for Humanity — 17% of income from government
  • Habitat for Humanity Portland Metro East — 14% of income from government
  • Habitat for Humanity of Broward Inc — 6% of income from government
  • Habitat for Humanity of the Chesapeake Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Habitat for Humanity of Lake-Sumter Florida Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Raritan Valley Habitat for Humanity Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Habitat for Humanity Metrowest- Greater Worcester Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Habitat for Humanity Greater Orlando and Osceola County Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Tulsa Habitat for Humanity Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Pensacola Habitat for Humanity Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
134report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 1011 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines