Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Habitat for Humanity of Colorado Inc

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

$7.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$1.4M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 72% of HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLORADO INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $1.2M
  • $250k+7 grants · $6.2M
$212,852
Median grant
2
States reached
$9.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREELEY-WELD HFH OF CO$1,436,000
METRO DENVER HFH OF CO$1,284,827
ROARING FORK VALLEY$1,142,000
VAIL VALLEY HFH OF CO$1,057,000
ST VRAIN VALLEY HFH OF CO$611,070
PIKES PEAK HFH OF CO$430,000
FORT COLLINS HFH OF CO$269,000
MESA COUNTY HFH OF CO$212,852
LOVELAND HFH OF CO$210,000
FLATIRONS HFH OF CO$210,000
ARCHULETA COUNTY HFH OF CO$150,000
SAN JUANS HFH$144,000
GRAND COUNTY HFH OF CO$122,069
GUNNISON VALLEY HFH OF CO$120,000
HFH OF LARAMIE COUNTY INC$30,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 60% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL: $40k → 22%FLATIRONS HFH OF CO: $210k → 5%GRAND COUNTY HFH OF CO: $122k → 7%VAIL VALLEY HFH OF CO: $1.3M → 7%ROARING FORK VALLEY: $1.1M → 8%PIKES PEAK HFH OF CO: $430k → 9%SUMMIT HFH OF CO: $130k → 9%GREELEY-WELD HFH OF CO: $1.4M → 9%ARCHULETA COUNTY HFH OF CO: $158k → 10%MESA COUNTY HFH OF CO: $460k → 11%LOVELAND HFH OF CO: $369k → 11%SAN JUANS HFH: $144k → 12%ST VRAIN VALLEY HFH OF CO: $611k → 12%METRO DENVER HFH OF CO: $1.3M → 12%PUEBLO HFH OF CO: $30k → 15%SAN LUIS VALLEY HFH OF CO: $58k → 17%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL: $33k → 22%FLATIRONS HFH OF CO: $150k → 5%GUNNISON VALLEY HFH OF CO: $120k → 7%VAIL VALLEY HFH OF CO: $1.1M → 7%ROARING FORK VALLEY: $670k → 8%PIKES PEAK HFH OF CO: $344k → 9%SUMMIT HFH OF CO: $60k → 9%GREELEY-WELD HFH OF CO: $376k → 9%ARCHULETA COUNTY HFH OF CO: $150k → 10%MESA COUNTY HFH OF CO: $213k → 11%LOVELAND HFH OF CO: $240k → 11%ST VRAIN VALLEY HFH OF CO: $240k → 12%METRO DENVER HFH OF CO: $1.0M → 12%SAN LUIS VALLEY HFH OF CO: $30k → 17%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL: $27k → 22%MONTEZUMA COUNTY HFH OF CO: $50k → 7%VAIL VALLEY HFH OF CO: $60k → 7%PIKES PEAK HFH OF CO: $150k → 9%GREELEY-WELD HFH OF CO: $346k → 9%ARCHULETA COUNTY HFH OF CO: $60k → 10%MESA COUNTY HFH OF CO: $75k → 11%LOVELAND HFH OF CO: $210k → 11%ST VRAIN VALLEY HFH OF CO: $200k → 12%METRO DENVER HFH OF CO: $540k → 12%MONTEZUMA COUNTY HFH OF CO: $30k → 7%FORT COLLINS HFH OF CO: $280k → 11%GUNNISON VALLEY HFH OF CO: $30k → 7%FORT COLLINS HFH OF CO: $269k → 11%GRAND COUNTY HFH OF CO: $30k → 7%FORT COLLINS HFH OF CO: $120k → 11%BERTHOUD HFH OF CO: $80k → 11%BERTHOUD HFH OF CO: $66k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$16M · 20 repeat orgs$246k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against -15% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
5

Total granted

$16M
$216k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
-15%

Still filing today

100%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Housing & ShelterInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF METRO DENVER INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $2.9M · revenue +21%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ROARING FORK
    3× · 2023–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +70%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ST VRAIN VALLEY
    3× · 2023–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • CC
    CHAFFEE COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    one grant, 2024 · $65k · revenue -17%
  • VV
    VAIL VALLEY HFH OF CO
    one grant, 2023 · $60k
  • WC
    WILL COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    one grant, 2024 · $41k · revenue -15%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Habitat Community Housing Development Inc

Development of affordable housing

—
2
Habitat for Humanity International Scotts Bluff County

Most construction work is performed by volunteers

—
3
Habitat for Humanity International Inc

Seeking to put gods love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
4
Habitat for Humanity International Inc

To eliminate poverty, housing and homelessness from the face of the earth by constructing and building adequate and basic housing.

—
5
Habitat for Humanity of Grant County Inc

To create decent affordable housing for those in need and to make decent shelter a matter of conscience with people everywhere.

—
6
Habitat for Humanity of Worcester County Inc

To build and rehabilitate houses which are sold to low-income families through no-interest loans

—
7
Habitat for Humanity International Inc

To put God's love into action, Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope.

—
8
Habitat for Humanity International Wabash County Hfh

Wabash county habitat for humanity, inc. is a non-profit organization working in partnership with god and people everywhere, from all walks of life, to build decent, affordable housing.

—
9
Habitat for Humanity Pennyrile Region Inc

To provide affordable housing and financing to low income families.

Housing & Shelter
10
Habitat for Humanity the Wind River Country

The organization builds homes for low income families.

—
11
Habitat for Humanity of Greater Fredericksburg Texas Inc

Provision of decent, affordable housing for lower income families.

—
12
Habitat for Humanity of the San Gorgonio Pass Area

Construct low income housing for families who live in substandard dwellings and cannot afford to improve their living standards by conventional means.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Habitat for Humanity St Vrain Valley and the most unlike its peers is Greeley Area Habitat for Humanity. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%5%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr17%0%20–35yr12%95%35–55yr13%0%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%1%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr17%0%20–35yr12%99%35–55yr13%0%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
13%
2,022/15,922

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
13/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF METRO DENVER INC — $2,871,827 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF METRO DENVER INCHABITAT FOR HUMANITY VAIL VALLEY INC — $2,337,360 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY VAIL VALLEY INCHABITAT FOR HUMANITY ROARING FORK — $1,832,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY ROARING FORKHABITAT FOR HUMANITY ST VRAIN VALLEY — $1,051,070 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY ST VRAIN VALLEYPIKES PEAK HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $924,052 · OtherPIKES PEAK HABITAT FOR HUMANITYLOVELAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $818,860 · OtherLOVELAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC+12 more — $1,497,440 · Other+12 moreGREELEY AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $2,158,360 · Housing & ShelterGREELEY AREA HABITAT FOR HUMAN…HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF MESA COUNTY — $747,977 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF MESA C…FORT COLLINS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $669,000 · Housing & ShelterFORT COLLINS HABITAT FOR HUMAN…Habitat for Humanity of Boulder Valley — $360,000 · Housing & ShelterHabitat for Humanity of Boulde…HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE SAN JUANS — $194,360 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GRAND COUNTY — $159,569 · Housing & Shelter+1 more — $40,500 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC — $183,745 · International
Other$11,332,609Housing & Shelter$4,329,766International$183,745

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF METRO DENVER INC — $2,871,827 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY VAIL VALLEY INC — $2,337,360 over 2y, 13% of budgetGREELEY AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $2,158,360 over 3y, 11% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY ROARING FORK — $1,832,000 over 3y, 9.8% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY ST VRAIN VALLEY — $1,051,070 over 3y, 14% of budgetPIKES PEAK HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $924,052 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetLOVELAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $818,860 over 3y, 6.3% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF MESA COUNTY — $747,977 over 3y, 8.8% of budgetFORT COLLINS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $669,000 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ARCHULETA COUNTY INC — $367,860 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of Boulder Valley — $360,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetBLUE SPRUCE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $270,360 over 2y, 8.8% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE SAN JUANS — $194,360 over 2y, 8.0% of budgetSummit Habitat for Humanity — $190,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC — $183,745 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GRAND COUNTY — $159,569 over 3y, 42% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GUNNISON VALLEY — $150,000 over 2y, 62% of budgetBERTHOUD HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $146,360 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetSAN LUIS VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $87,860 over 2y, 18% of budgetHabitat For Humanity International Inc Habitat for Humanity of Montezuma County — $80,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetCHAFFEE COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $65,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetWILL COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $40,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF LARAMIE COUNTY INC — $30,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF PUEBLO INC — $30,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF MCHENRY COU — $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Habitat for Humanity …Colorado Gives Founda…Anschutz Family Found…Thrivent Financial fo…Nebraska Community Fo…The Denver FoundationColorado Association …Community Foundation …The Colorado Health F…Mark and Linda Kissel…Otter Cares Foundatio…Enterprise Holdings F…
Habitat for Humanity International IncGA51.2× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Habitat for Humanity International Inc · Colorado Gives Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · Thrivent Financial for Lutherans-Group · Nebraska Community Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Colorado Association of Realtors Foundation · Community Foundation of Northern Colorado · The Colorado Health Foundation · Mark and Linda Kissel Family Foundation · Otter Cares Foundation AKA OTTERCARES FOUNDATION · Enterprise Holdings Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Habitat for Humanity of Colorado Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines