· Private foundation
Delta Dental Community Care Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k84 grants · $333k
- $10k–50k127 grants · $3.1M
- $50k–250k151 grants · $15M
- $250k+27 grants · $15M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION | $4,000,000 |
| UNITED HEALTH CENTERS OF THE SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY | $1,000,000 |
| COMMUNITY CLINICS HEALTH NETWORK DBA HEALTH QUALITY PARTNERS | $988,000 |
| DELTA HEALTH CENTER INC | $876,900 |
| MARY'S CENTER | $661,764 |
| DIENTES COMMUNITY DENTAL CARE | $574,307 |
| MEALS ON WHEELS SAN FRANCISCO | $500,000 |
| AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS DBA AMERICAN RED CROSS | $500,000 |
| DELTA HEALTH CENTER INC | $500,000 |
| SALUD PARA LA GENTE | $410,693 |
| DIENTES COMMUNITY DENTAL CARE | $400,000 |
| HOWARD UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY | $300,000 |
| SOUTH COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC | $300,000 |
| ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC DBA ALZHEIMER'S A | $300,000 |
| AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS DBA AMERICAN RED CROSS | $300,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $11.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 9% of Delta Dental Community Care Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 47% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 40% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
538 repeat relationships — 269 still active in FY2025, 269 since wound down; 54 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.7M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AHAmerican Heart Association Inc4× · 2022–2025 · $11M · revenue +25%
- MCMary's Center for Maternal and Child Care Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $4.2M · revenue +70%
- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches6× · 2018–2023 · $3.5M · revenue +9%
Funded once
- TATEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF DENTISTRYone grant, 2018 · $771k
- LRLos Rios Colleges Foundationgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $425k · revenue +27%
- TOTEXAS ORAL HEALTH COALITIONone grant, 2018 · $346k · revenue -86% · 71% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To improve the health of our patients and community by providing high quality, cost-effective, culturally sensitive, patient-centered health care.
Community health center of snohomish county (chc) provides our diverse communities with access to high quality, affordable primary health care.
Fhcsd's primary mission is to provide comprehensive, accessible and quality health care services to all income levels with a special committment to low income medically underserved individuals.
To provide culturally sensitive, coordinated primary care services emphasizing education, prevention, and advocacy, regardless of one's ability to pay.
The organization provides quality and accessible health care to underserved communties and a pateint centered model of care to empower communities towards wellness.
The mission of newark community health centers is to provide affordable, high quality, and accessible healthcare to the communities that we serve. as one of the largest providers of comprehensive primary care services for uninsured and…
To provide patient-centered healthcare with excellence in quality, service and access.
We provide high quality, patient centered health care that is respectful, compassionate and accessible to all members of our community.
The mission of ccwv is to help our communities live the healthiest lives possible by meeting their immediate and long-term healthcare needs. this mission is accomplished by providing high quality, accessible, comprehensive, culturally…
Communicare health center's mission is rooted in the underlying philosophy that health care is a right, not a privilege. our mission is characterized by the following commitments: (i) we provide comprehensive and high-quality health care…
The mission of community health centers is to provide quality and compassionate primary healthcare services to central florida's diverse communities.
To maintain a high quality patient care delivery system that provides access to comprehensive health care services, regardless of ability to pay. it is the desire of chccw to treat all patients with the dignity and respect they deserve…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Miami Beach Community Health Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Two Rivers Health & Wellness Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
701 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 701 of the 887 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds Mary's Center for Maternal and Child Care Inc ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds UNITED HEALTH CENTERS OF THE SAN JOAQUIN ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF SAN FRANCISCO INC ↗
- Who funds DIENTES COMMUNITY DENTAL CARE ↗
- Who funds LIFELONG MEDICAL CARE ↗
- Who funds ASIAN HEALTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds SALUD PARA LA GENTE ↗
- Who funds WESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds HEALTH QUALITY PARTNERS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds TIBURCIO VASQUEZ HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds University of the Pacific ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds CATCH Global Foundation ↗
- Who funds OLE HEALTH ↗
- Who funds ST JOHN'S COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗
- Who funds COMPREHENSIVE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds TEAMSMILE INC ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds CENTRO DE SALUD DE LA COMUNIDAD DE SAN YSIDRO INC ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds DELTA HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HEALTHY SMILES FOR KIDS OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN NOW ↗
- Who funds LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds HILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY CLINIC ↗
- Who funds REDWOODS RURAL HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds LA CLINICA DE LA RAZA INC ↗
- Who funds THE NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST ↗
- Who funds The Research Foundation for The State University of New York ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds NORTH EAST MEDICAL SERVICES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Direct Relief · California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn · Americares Foundation Inc · California Healthcare Foundation · Carequest Foundation Inc · Essential Access Health · California Primary Care Association · American Cancer Society Inc · Highmark Foundation · Delta Dental of California · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Delta Dental Community Care Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Camillus Health Concern Inc — 70% of income from government
- La Red Health Center Inc — 51% of income from government
- North Florida Medical Centers Inc — 33% of income from government
- Bond Community Health Center Inc — 27% of income from government
- Jessie Trice Community Health System Inc — 19% of income from government
- Suncoast Community Health Centers Inc — 17% of income from government
- Collier Health Services Inc — 15% of income from government
- Escambia Community Clinics Inc — 12% of income from government
- Family Health Centers of Southwest Florida Inc — 11% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Mcr Health Inc — 7% of income from government
- Chase Brexton Health Services Inc — 4% of income from government
- Volunteer Florida Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Caridad Center Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Delta Dental Community Care Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Delta Dental Community Care Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.