Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

UNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVER

UNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVER (California) receives grants from 161 organizations whose IRS filings report $7,857,971 to it, the largest being PETSMART CHARITIES INC ($2,250,000). 73 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$7.0M
Funders on record
161
Grants received
$7.9M
Net assets
$8.3M
73/161 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 24%
01What it does

What United Animal Nations Dba Redrover does

Mission

To bring animals out of crisis and strengthen the bond between people and animals through emergency sheltering, disaster relief services, financial assistance and education. Redrover accomplishes its mission by engaging volunteers and supporters, collaborating with others and maximizing the use of online technology.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Redrover relief - in 2023, redrover relief provided guidance, referrals, case management, and financial assistance to 5,358 good samaritans, animal rescuers and pet owners, helping them obtain emergency veterinary care for animals in life-threatening situations. Redrover relief case managers awarded 539 redrover relief grants, totaling $188,517 for these animals in crisis. Redrover relief case managers also worked with domestic violence advocates to help fleeing victims get their pets to safety. Redrover's safe escape grant program, which provides funding for urgent boarding and veterinary care for domestic violence victims' pets, provided 13,681 safe nights of boarding to 336 pets, giving 298 grants, totaling $312,695. In addition, redrover relief awarded 25 safe housing grants to domestic violence shelters and animal organizations, totaling $1,104,655. Redrover takes a long-term approach to helping domestic violence victims and their pets through these safe housing grants by giving shelters the funds and guidance needed to create permanent pet housing on-site, adjacent to, or outside the organization's shelter so that families may bring their pets directly to the shelter. Also…

    $2,871,254 spentof which $1,895,717 as grants$-57,629 earned by the program
    59% of program spending
  2. Redrover responders - in 2023, redrover responders deployed 15 times. We had 2,861 volunteer hours and helped a total of 2,076 animals. In january, we sent a team of volunteers to mississippi to assist the humane society of the united states with the sheltering and care of 170 cats rescued from an alleged cruelty situation. In june, the redrover responders team was on the ground in missouri helping national mill dog rescue care for 127 dogs transported from a commercial breeding facility in another state. In 2023, we continued our two new redrover responders initiatives: community programs and coastal cats. For community programs, our volunteers provide hands-on support with projects designed to meet the specific needs of a community, which are often isolated, at-risk, or under-resourced communities. In 2023, we helped with 6 different projects, including a spay/neuter and wellness clinic in arizona and building outdoor enclosures for dogs living on chains in rural south carolina and michigan. For coastal cats, redrover works with partners to provide proactive support for community cats in coastal communities that are at risk for hurricanes and severe flooding. In 2023, we…

    $711,307 spent
    15% of program spending
  3. Redrover readers - in 2023, redrover readers trained 92 people on how to implement the readers curriculum in 10 workshops. The unique, animal-themed, literature-based social and emotional learning program is aligned with academic content standards and helps children understand animals and practice empathy through stories and discussion. This year, 16 readings took place online and in classrooms, reaching an estimated 2,054 new children and adding to the estimated total reach of 123,361 children. Kind news magazine reached 275,913 children in 2023 through print subscriptions and digital downloads, and nearly 1.5 million children since we adopted the publication in 2017. Our redrover readers program established a new community partnership with forest school in south texas and added seven new diverse and nature-based books that are representative of the region. We wrapped up the early ages gathering to learn empathy through stories (eagles) pilot program with our community program partners, the sacramento native american health center (snahc), and were invited back to co-create curriculum with them for another five books for the eagles program. Also in 2023, we started work on a…

    $499,292 spent$12,733 earned by the program
    10% of program spending
  4. Public education & outreach - using our quarterly membership companion magazine, email newsletters, direct animal cause mailings, website, social media, speaking and tabling engagements, brochures and other materials, redrover educated members and the general public about the following: redrover's programs, spotting and reporting animal abuse, the link between domestic violence and animal abuse, the impact of puppy mills on animals, and the benefits of adopting pets from animal shelters and animal advocacy. Volunteers and redrover staff helped spread the word about our work at 52 events and conferences. In march 2023, redrover sent a letter to freddie rodriguez, chair of the emergency management committee of the ca state assembly, in support of ab 781. This bill would require local governments to designate emergency shelters, warming centers, and cooling centers that are able to accommodate people with pets, and require pet emergency preparedness information be made available on local government websites. In august 2023, redrover joined more than 50 animal welfare and advocacy organizations to send a letter to members of the senate and house agriculture committees urging their…

    $812,212 spent$21,302 earned by the program
    17% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2023 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $4,894,065.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($2.9M) Expenses 100 ($2.6M) Net assets 100 ($6.6M)2018 Revenue 139 ($4.0M) Expenses 134 ($3.5M) Net assets 101 ($6.7M)2019 Revenue 106 ($3.1M) Expenses 155 ($4.1M) Net assets 91 ($6.0M)2020 Revenue 172 ($4.9M) Expenses 155 ($4.0M) Net assets 106 ($7.0M)2021 Revenue 201 ($5.8M) Expenses 176 ($4.6M) Net assets 121 ($8.0M)2022 Revenue 180 ($5.2M) Expenses 215 ($5.6M) Net assets 105 ($6.9M)2023 Revenue 213 ($6.1M) Expenses 236 ($6.2M) Net assets 111 ($7.3M)2024 Revenue 242 ($7.0M) Expenses 242 ($6.3M) Net assets 125 ($8.3M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (242)Expenses (242)Net assets (125)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2018 to 2019, from $8.0M to $6.2M (−22%).

$6.8M
$8.0M
$6.2M
$7.2M
$8.3M
$7.3M
$7.9M
$8.9M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$259k
’17
$497k
’18
−$995k
’19
$885k
’20
$1.2M
’21
−$442k
’22
−$44k
’23
$618k
’24
2.7
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed9119108131214
Joined·+3+0+2+1+6+0+6
No longer listed·1213114
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 23 funders to 54 funders, grant income rose $114k → $1.3M.

20 of 161 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 17% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of UNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVER’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 161 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

UNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVER leans on a few funders — its largest provides 29% of grant income and the top three 63%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

48% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund UNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVER.

29%
largest funder
63%
top three
~6
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 35% · 2018 27% · 2019 76% · 2020 62% · 2021 17% · 2022 18% · 2023 56% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

27% of UNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVER's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 45% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

UNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVER draws 91% of its grant income from funders outside California, across 32 states in all.

ME
WA
ID
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
NE
MO
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
AR
NC
AL
GA
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $1.3M arriving through sponsors registered in 15 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like UNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVER

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

79% of spending goes to programs.

Program 79%Management 7%Fundraising 15%

Governance

9
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

79%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 38 states

AK
ME
NH
WA
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
KY
WV
VA
MD
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
MS
AL
GA
FL

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for UNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVER: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds UNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVER?
UNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVER (California) receives grants from 161 organizations whose IRS filings report $7,857,971 to it, the largest being PETSMART CHARITIES INC ($2,250,000). 73 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does UNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVER have?
IRS filings report 161 organizations giving $7,857,971 in grants to UNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVER, 73 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of UNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVER?
PETSMART CHARITIES INC is the largest funder on record, with $2,250,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like UNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVER find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 161 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing