Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

California Primary Care Association

To lead and position community clinics, health centers, and networksthrough advocacy, education and services as key players in the healthcare delivery system to improve the health status of their communities.

$11M
Granted FY2025still arriving
51
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$30MPublic Benefit$2.0MHuman Services$683kCivil Rights$102kArts & Culture$100kCommunity Improvement$50k
02FY2025 · 51 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $237k
  • $50k–250k30 grants · $3.1M
  • $250k+14 grants · $7.8M
$100,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REDWOOD COMMUNITY HEALTH COALITION$1,071,751
CALIFORNIA PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION ADVOCATES$974,398
CCALAC$843,654
COMMUNITY HEALTH PARTNERSHIP INC$727,925
ALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES$683,786
COALITION OF ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY CLINICS$680,352
COMMUNITY CLINICS HEALTH NETWORK DBA HEALTH QUALITY PARTNERS$570,255
COMMUNITY HEALTH ASSOCIATION INLAND SOUTHERN REGION$533,903
ALAMEDA HEALTH CONSORTIUM$343,218
NORTH COAST CLINICS NETWORK$309,330
CA CONSORTIUM FOR URBAN INDIAN HEALTH$290,371
HEALTH CENTER PARTNERS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$278,997
CA RURAL INDIAN HEALTH BOARD$270,000
CENTRAL VALLEY HEALTH NETWORK$254,241
SAN FRANCISCO-COMMUNITY CLINIC CONSORTIUM$206,250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $448k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LATINO HEALTH ACCESS: $54k → 10%LATINO HEALTH ACCESS: $47k → 10%SHARE OUR SELVES: $75k → 10%DAVIS STREET PRIMARY CARE CLINIC: $5k → 10%FAMILIES TOGETHER OF ORANGE COUNTY: $75k → 10%COFEM: $47k → 14%COFEM: $47k → 14%EL PROYECTO DEL BARRIO: $100k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$28M · 54 repeat orgs$4.8M to everyone else

54 repeat relationships — 44 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

54
49

Total granted

$28M
$3.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+37%

Still filing today

94%
92%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $979k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationCivil RightsArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    CALIFORNIA PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION ADVOCATES
    7× · 2017–2025 · $3.1M · revenue +507% · 47% of their budget
  • COMMUNITY CLINIC ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $2.6M · revenue +27%
  • AH
    ALIADOS HEALTH
    6× · 2020–2025 · $2.1M · revenue +169%

Funded once

  • SH
    SAC HEALTH SYSTEM
    one grant, 2022 · $175k · revenue +24%
  • MISSION CITY COMMUNITY NETWORK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $150k · revenue +115%
  • OH
    OLE HEALTHgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $150k · revenue +136%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Asian Pacific Health Care Venture Inc

Asian Pacific Health Care Venture, Inc. is a family of community health centers whose mission is to be the medical home for our patients by providing personalized, quality health care services in a culturally accessible manner.

—
2
San Fernando Community Hospital

Provides primary care, oral health, and behavioral health care, including health education to the community without regard to the ability to pay for services.

Health
3
Open Door Community Health Centers

Open Door Community Health Centers promotes social justice and human dignity through exceptional patient-centered care that improves the health and well-being of our patients, community, and staff.

Health
4
Redwoods Rural Health Center Inc

Redwoods Rural Health Center is a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) that provides primary, preventative healthcare services to all people without regard to social or economic status.

Health
5
Mendocino Coast Clinics Inc

Mendocino Coast Clinics

—
6
Community Health Center of Snohomish County

Community health center of snohomish county (chc) provides our diverse communities with access to high quality, affordable primary health care.

Health
7
Community Health Centers of the Central Coast Inc

To provide primary health and dental care services to low income patients in the Central Coast Communities of California

Health
8
East Valley Community Health Center Inc

East valley community health center's mission is to provide access to excellent health care while engaging and empowering our patients, employees and partners to improve their well-being and health of our communities.

—
9
Mendocino Community Health Clinic Inc

To provide the highest quality healthcare for everyone in our communities.

Health
10
Nuestra Clinica Del Valle Inc

Our mission is to provide comprehensive, patient-centered primary care and to cultivate partnerships between our patients and their health care providers while excelling at customer service.

—
11
Long Valley Health Center

Long Valley Health Center is a rural federally qualified health clinic offering primary health, including physical examinations, dental services, acupuncture, well baby checks and immunizations. Long Valley Health Center will work to…

Health
12
Imperial Beach Community Clinic

Operate clinics to providing primary healthcare to people of all ages in imperial beach and surrounding communities and southwest San Diego county place emphasis on patient satisfaction in a sensitive environment.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Comprehensive Community Health Centers Inc and the most unlike its peers is Lodi Adopt-a-Child. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyUnion Benefit Trust FundsHomeless Services & HousingChild & Family Mental Healt…K-8 Charter SchoolsHealthcare Foundations and …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%2%<5yr15%1%5–10yr20%9%10–20yr17%40%20–35yr11%31%35–55yr12%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%1%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%20%10–20yr17%40%20–35yr11%24%35–55yr12%14%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.9%1/109
the rest of the field
14%
19,915/139,489

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

104 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 104 of the 109 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
100/104
Grantees still filing
79/104
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CALIFORNIA PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION ADVOCATES — $3,136,898 · HealthCALIFORNIA PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION ADVOCATESCOMMUNITY CLINIC ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY — $2,615,180 · HealthCOMMUNITY CLINIC ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES COUNTYALIADOS HEALTH — $2,059,687 · HealthALIADOS HEALTHCOALITION OF OC COMMUNITY CLINICS — $1,775,831 · HealthCOALITION OF OC COMMUNITY CLINICSALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION — $1,435,072 · HealthALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATIONCOMMUNITY HEALTH PARTNERSHIP (CHP) — $1,313,425 · HealthCENTRAL VALLEY HEALTH NETWORK INC — $1,097,812 · HealthALAMEDA HEALTH CONSORTIUM — $1,033,486 · HealthNORTH COAST CLINICS NETWORK — $985,747 · Health+64 more — $9,252,286 · Health+64 moreCommunity Health Association Inland Southern Region — $1,765,880 · OtherCommunity Health Associ…HEALTH CENTER PARTNERS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $1,161,241 · OtherHEALTH CENTER PARTNERS …CALIFORNIA CONSORTIUM FOR URBAN INDIAN HEALTH — $594,721 · OtherCALIFORNIA CONSORTIUM F…CA BENEFITS ALLIANCE FOR NONPROFITS VOLUNTARY EMPLOYEES' BENEFICIARY ASSN TR — $538,026 · OtherCA BENEFITS ALLIANCE FO…San Francisco Community Clinic Consortium — $459,250 · OtherSan Francisco Community…NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTHCARE — $400,000 · OtherNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTHCAREHERITAGE JUNCTION OF MCCLOUD INC — $380,000 · OtherHERITAGE JUNCTION OF MC…Community Clinic Consortium — $318,085 · Other+16 more — $1,156,811 · Other+16 moreLODI ADOPT-A-CHILD — $408,013 · Human ServicesLATINO HEALTH ACCESS — $100,000 · Human ServicesEL PROYECTO DEL BARRIO INC — $100,000 · Human ServicesCONSEJO DE FEDERACIONES MEXICANAS EN NORTE AMERICA — $93,000 · Human ServicesShare Our Selves Corporation — $75,000 · Human ServicesFAMILIES TOGETHER OF ORANGE COUNTY — $75,000 · Human Services+1 more — $5,000 · Human ServicesThe Latino Coalition for Community Leadership — $100,000 · Community ImprovementORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITIES ORGANIZED FOR RESPONSIBLE DEVELOPMENT — $96,000 · Community ImprovementMI FAMILIA EN ACCION — $193,834 · Civil RightsLATINO SERVICE PROVIDERS — $100,000 · Arts & CultureUNICARE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC — $100,000 · Education
Health$24,705,424Other$6,774,014Human Services$856,013Community Improvement$196,000Civil Rights$193,834Arts & Culture$100,000Education$100,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCALIFORNIA PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION ADVOCATES — $3,136,898 over 7y, 47% of budgetCOMMUNITY CLINIC ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY — $2,615,180 over 6y, 11% of budgetALIADOS HEALTH — $2,059,687 over 6y, 9.5% of budgetCOALITION OF OC COMMUNITY CLINICS — $1,775,831 over 6y, 5.3% of budgetCommunity Health Association Inland Southern Region — $1,765,880 over 6y, 25% of budgetALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION — $1,435,072 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH PARTNERSHIP (CHP) — $1,313,425 over 5y, 27% of budgetHEALTH CENTER PARTNERS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $1,161,241 over 5y, 5.8% of budgetCENTRAL VALLEY HEALTH NETWORK INC — $1,097,812 over 5y, 16% of budgetALAMEDA HEALTH CONSORTIUM — $1,033,486 over 5y, 5.0% of budgetNORTH COAST CLINICS NETWORK — $985,747 over 6y, 54% of budgetCALIFORNIA CONSORTIUM FOR URBAN INDIAN HEALTH — $594,721 over 5y, 9.8% of budgetHEALTH QUALITY PARTNERS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $570,255 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCA BENEFITS ALLIANCE FOR NONPROFITS VOLUNTARY EMPLOYEES' BENEFICIARY ASSN TR — $538,026 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetCALIFORNIA RURAL INDIAN HEALTH BOARD INC — $520,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED HEALTH CENTERS OF THE SAN JOAQUIN — $511,663 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSan Francisco Community Clinic Consortium — $459,250 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTHCARE — $400,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSouthside Coalition of Community Health Centers — $375,000 over 3y, 30% of budgetCALIFORNIA PLANNED PARENTHOOD EDUCATION FUND INC — $360,000 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetJWCH INSTITUTE INC — $330,529 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRO DE SALUD DE LA COMUNIDAD DE SAN YSIDRO INC — $325,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Clinic Consortium — $318,085 over 4y, 58% of budgetHEALTH ALLIANCE OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA — $314,615 over 4y, 22% of budgetGARDNER FAMILY HEALTH NETWORK INC — $300,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHEAST VALLEY HEALTH CORPORATION — $275,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER NETWORK INC — $260,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetWELLSPACE HEALTH — $259,846 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSANTA ROSA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS — $250,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY HEALTHCARE NETWORK — $245,176 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetElica Health Centers — $207,942 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetINDIAN HEALTH CENTER OF SANTA CLARA VALLEY — $200,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMI FAMILIA EN ACCION — $193,834 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCAMARENA HEALTH — $183,159 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSAC HEALTH SYSTEM — $175,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPEACH TREE HEALTHCARE — $159,165 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMISSION CITY COMMUNITY NETWORK INC — $150,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetOLE HEALTH — $150,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLIFELONG MEDICAL CARE — $150,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPETALUMA HEALTH CENTER INC — $150,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWorking Partnerships USA — $130,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFAMILY HEALTH CENTERS OF SAN DIEGO INC — $129,438 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLA CLINICA DE LA RAZA INC — $125,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY MEDICAL CENTERS INC — $125,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVISTA COMMUNITY CLINIC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SAN DIEGO LESBIAN GAY BISEXUAL TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY CENTER — $100,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLA MAESTRA FAMILY CLINIC INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Latino Coalition for Community Leadership — $100,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Physicians…Direct ReliefCalifornia Healthcare…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Essential Access Heal…Delta Dental Communit…The California Wellne…The California Endowm…East Bay Community Fo…Tides CenterPublic Health Institu…Tides Foundation
California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California FdnCA116.8× affinity58 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn · Direct Relief · California Healthcare Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Essential Access Health · Delta Dental Community Care Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · The California Endowment · East Bay Community Foundation · Tides Center · Public Health Institute · Tides Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization California Primary Care Association funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 109 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home