How much did ESSENTIAL ACCESS HEALTH grant in FY2024?

Health$119MHuman Services$5.8MPhilanthropy$2.0MEducation$716kInternational$600kReligion$322kCommunity Improvement$184kArts & Culture$180kEmployment$125kOther$48M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

provision planningplanning outreachoutreach eligible

2019

provision planningplanning outreachoutreach eligible

2020

provision planningplanning outreachoutreach eligible

2021

provision planningplanning outreachoutreach eligible

2022

expand medabprovision planningplanning outreachoutreach eligible

2023

educationprimarymedicalsanunderservedcomprehensivepatients

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 102 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

$10k–50k2 grants · $40k
$50k–250k67 grants · $9.7M
$250k+33 grants · $24M

$171,424

Median grant

States reached

$40M

Total assets

Largest grants

PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST$2,646,752
PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE$2,426,439
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF LOS ANGELES$2,150,171
PLANNED PARENTHOOD ORANGE & SAN BERNARDINO$1,830,750
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF PASEDENA AND SAN GABRIEL VALLEY$1,602,761
PLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTHERN CALIFORNIA$1,295,062
ACCESS REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE$1,125,000
FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS OF SAN DIEGO INC$722,084
BIRTHWORKERS OF COLOR COLLECTIVE$620,000
COUNTY OF LA DHS HARBOR UCLA MEDICAL CTR DEPT OF OBGYN$600,000
COUNTY OF LA DHS LAC USC MEDICAL CTR DEPT OF OBGYN$600,000
COUNTY OF LA DHS OLIVE VIEW MEDICAL CTR DEPT OF OBGYN$600,000
COUNTY OF LA DHS WOMEN'S HEALTH PROGRAM & INNOVATION$550,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF CALIFORNIA CENTRAL COAST$478,040
FAMILY PLANNING ASSOCIATES MEDICAL GROUP$475,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $5.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 10%. 78% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$175M · 136 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +73% since the first grant, against +66% for the ones you funded once.

136 repeat relationships — 91 still active in FY2024, 45 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

136

Total granted

$175M

$952k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+73%

+66%

Still filing today

79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $985k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

PP OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST
6× · 2017–2024 · $10M · revenue +73%
PP MAR MONTE
5× · 2017–2024 · $10M · revenue +25%
PP OF LOS ANGELES
8× · 2017–2024 · $8.0M · revenue +73%

Funded once

DC
DUPONT CLINIC
one grant, 2023 · $450k
CHINATOWN SERVICE CENTERgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +379%
SC
STANISLAUS COUNTY HEALTH SERVICES AGENCY
one grant, 2017 · $95k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Community Health Center of

To provide our diverse community with access to high quality, affordable primary health care

Health

California Primary Care Association

Position community health clinics to be key players in the health care delivery system to improve the health status of their communities.

Health

San Fernando Community Hospital

Provides primary care.

Health

Complete Care Community Health Center I

The organization is devoted to serving the medical needs of the underprivileged of california.

Health

Marana Health Center Inc

Improving our community by providing exceptional, whole-person healthcare.

Health

United Health Centers of the San Joaquin

The organization is committed to the lifetime wellness of the communities by providing accessible, comprehensive quality health care to everyone with the compassion and respect, regardless of ability to pay.

Health

Universal Community Health Center

The organization provides quality and accessible health care to underserved communities and a patient centered model of care to empower communities towards wellness.

Health

Pomona Community Health Center

To be the medical home for the underserved in our community by providing high quality preventive and primary care health services.

Health

El Dorado Community Health Center

To provide health & social services to people in the el dorado county area targeted primarily to the medi-cal and uninsured population.

Health

Tri-Cities Community Health

Deliver the highest quality health care to every person, every time.

—

Physicians for a Healthy California

Physicians for a Healthy California is dedicated to improving community health, growing a diverse physician workforce and promoting health equity. Our programs continue to improve public health, provide clinical practice support and…

Health

Long Valley Health Center

Long Valley Health Center is a rural community federally qualified health clinic offering primary health care services, including physical examination, dental services, acupuncture, well baby check and immunizations. Long Valley Health…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Medical Centers Inc and the most unlike its peers is Tides Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 48 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/156

the rest of the field

12%

16,627/138,838

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

127 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

125/127

Grantees still filing

115/127

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Health$118,952,352Other$48,523,733Human Services$5,826,187Philanthropy$2,000,172Education$715,574International$600,000Religion$322,326

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Physicians' Service FdnCA107.7× affinity54 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Physicians' Service Fdn · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Direct Relief · California Healthcare Foundation · California Primary Care Association · Public Health Institute · Delta Dental Community Care Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · The California Endowment · East Bay Community Foundation · California Community Foundation · Sierra Health Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation ESSENTIAL ACCESS HEALTH funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: THE LOS ANGELES METROPOLITAN CHURCHES.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~1 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 6 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +89% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 954547514 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on THE LOS ANGELES METROPOLITAN CHURCHES, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 61% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Essential Access Health?

Find your warmest path to Essential Access Health through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

ESSENTIAL ACCESS HEALTH

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?