Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Americares Foundation Inc

Americares mission is to help people and communities around the world access (see schedule o).

$1.8B
Granted FY2025still arriving
92
Grants FY2025still arriving
24
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$17MPublic Safety & Disaster$1.9MInternational$1.3MEducation$1.3MHuman Services$853kReligion$183kHousing & Shelter$179kFood & Nutrition$131kOther$0
02FY2025 · 92 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 92 grants below total $3,841,210 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,756,724,514 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,752,883,304 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $109k
  • $10k–50k56 grants · $1.1M
  • $50k–250k19 grants · $2.3M
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$20,000
Median grant
24
States reached
$373M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEDICAL MISSION ADVENTURES$300,427
CARESOUTH CAROLINA INC$240,000
AMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID$215,000
PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION$200,000
MEDGLOBAL INC$185,000
COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS OF PINELLAS INC$180,000
HEADINGTON INSTITUTE$150,000
SISTERS OF MERCY URGENT CARE INC$150,000
MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY HEALTH PARTNERSHIP INCORPORATED$120,000
HIGH COUNTRY COMMUNITY HEALTH$120,000
MAYFIELD GRAVES LTRG INC$100,000
ALOHA HOUSE INC$88,000
MAUI AIDS FOUNDATION$81,000
HISPANOLA HEALTH PARTNERS$80,643
LESTONNAC FREE CLINIC$78,300
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $764k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ONE HUNDRED ANGELS: $10k → 11%COVE HOUSE FREE CLINIC: $6k → 12%GOOD NEIGHBOR SETTLEMENT HOUSE: $10k → 23%HOPE CLINIC AND CARE CENTER: $30k → 6%HELPING HANDS OF MIDDLE & WEST TENNESSEE (HHT): $25k → 15%UNETE INC: $20k → 12%ST VINCENT DE PAUL COMMUNITY PHARMACY OF CINCINNATI: $10k → 16%MANNA MINISTRIES INC: $9k → 18%LOUISIANA ASSISTIVE TECH ACCESS NETWORK: $10k → 19%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT - LANCASTER KY: $10k → 16%AJO AMBULANCE INC: $10k → 15%Womankind: $10k → 13%HOPE CLINIC AND CARE CENTER INC: $15k → 6%NOVA SCRIPTSCENTRAL: $10k → 6%LOUISIANA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY ACCESS NETWORK (LATAN): $10k → 19%Covenant House Florida: $100k → 13%MISSION OF MERCY: $9k → 11%ON EAGLES WINGS INC DBA WOVEN HEALTH CLINIC: $19k → 14%NATIONAL HEALTHCARE FOR HOMELESS COUNCIL: $10k → 14%THE ARC of NORTH CAROLINA INC: $10k → 8%COVENANT HOUSE NEW ORLEANS: $20k → 23%MISSION OF MERCY INC: $7k → 11%On Eagle's Wings Inc: $10k → 14%ONE HUNDRED ANGELS: $25k → 11%PLEA GLOBAL RESOURCE SHARING: $10k → 13%HOSPICE MAUI INC: $12k → 9%BEACON OF HOPE: $20k → 11%Covenant House Texas: $215k → 16%Covenant House Texas Inc: $10k → 16%Healthcare for the Homeless-Houston: $93k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
WY
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region — $264M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 9 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Central America and the Caribbean$72M · 27% · 197 grants

Stated purpose: PROGRAMS - PARTNER SUPPORT · ONGOING

Sub-Saharan Africa$71M · 27% · 174 grants

Stated purpose: PROGRAMS - PARTNER SUPPORT · ONGOING · EMERGENCY SUPPLIES

Russia and Neighboring States$49M · 18% · 21 grants

Stated purpose: PROGRAMS - PARTNER SUPPORT · ONGOING · EMERGENCY SUPPLIES

Middle East and North Africa$37M · 14% · 22 grants

Stated purpose: PROGRAMS - PARTNER SUPPORT · ONGOING · EMERGENCY SUPPLIES

South Asia$14M · 5% · 17 grants

Stated purpose: PROGRAMS - PARTNER SUPPORT · ONGOING

South America$13M · 5% · 50 grants

Stated purpose: PROGRAMS - PARTNER SUPPORT · ONGOING

North America (Canada and Mexico)$4.5M · 2% · 15 grants

Stated purpose: ONGOING

East Asia and the Pacific$3.5M · 1% · 39 grants

Stated purpose: PROGRAMS - PARTNER SUPPORT · ONGOING · EMERGENCY SUPPLIES

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$904k · 0% · 12 grants

Stated purpose: PROGRAMS - PARTNER SUPPORT · ONGOING

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

49%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$11M · 102 repeat orgs$12M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +56% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.

102 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2025, 71 since wound down; 60 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

102
193

Total granted

$11M
$8.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+30%

Still filing today

92%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalEducationCommunity ImprovementPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SAMARITAN HEALTH & WELLNESS CENTER INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $759k · revenue +61% · 26% of their budget
  • A
    ARCARE
    2× · 2022–2024 · $538k · revenue +98%
  • SF
    STEPHEN F AUSTIN COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER
    4× · 2017–2020 · $436k · revenue +457%

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICARES FREE CLINICS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $2.6M
  • CC
    CHRISTIAN CONNECTIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL HEALTH
    one grant, 2021 · $324k · revenue -42%
  • CH
    CHRISTUS HEALTH FOUNDATION OF Southeast Texasgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $323k · revenue +64%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Care Clinic Inc

To provide health care to low-income persons in the community who do not have health insurance through disease prevention, continuity of care, and active follow-up, we can prmote the health and well-being of the community.

Health
2
Christian Community Health Center

To provide high quality primary health care and related services to the community regardless of the ability to pay, in a manner which demonstrates in work and deed the love of Jesus Christ.

Philanthropy
3
Jonesboro Church Health Center Inc

Our purpose is to address health disparities reduce barriers to care by offering essential medical services to those most in need. Our vision is that every person in our community has access to healthcare regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
4
Shared Christian Ministries

Our mission is to provide quality comprehensive free or low cost medical care for the uninsured, whatever their race or religion. The Clinic's services are available to any uninsured adult, 18 years old or older.

Health
5
Grace Health Inc

To provide patient-centered healthcare with excellence in quality, service and access.

Health
6
Family Health Center Inc

To provide patients with the highest quality of care/services, including basic primary and preventive medical care, vision, dental, OBGYN, WIC services, and hospitalization.

Health
7
Community Health Center of Northeast Oklahoma

We recognize the diversity of the communities we serve and we are guided by our vision and commitment towards providing excellent primary care to our patients and their families. see schedule o for more information.

Health
8
Newark Community Health Centers Inc

The mission of newark community health centers is to provide affordable, high quality, and accessible healthcare to the communities that we serve. as one of the largest providers of comprehensive primary care services for uninsured and…

Health
9
Community Health Clinic Inc

The mission of community health clinic is to provide quality, affordable comprehensive primary healthcare services, across the lifecycles and regardless of the ability to pay, to residents of allegheny, armstrong, butler and westmoreland…

Health
10
Community First Health Centers

We provide high quality, patient centered health care that is respectful, compassionate and accessible to all members of our community.

Health
11
Community Health Care Inc

Federally Qualified Health Center The Organization provides medical and dental services to all community members regardless of income level.

—
12
First Care Clinic Inc

To be the region's premier medical home dedicated to providing access to compassionate, quality care for all.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Health and Hope Clinic Inc and the most unlike its peers is Imago Dei Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsFaith-Based Social ServicesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Affordable Housing Developm…Food Banks and PantriesUnited Way AffiliatesAddiction Recovery ServicesVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Community College Foundatio…Christian Missionary Organi…Developmental Disabilities …Immigrant Worker SupportPolicy Research and AdvocacyYouth Sports ProgramsCancer Support ServicesCommunity Arts CentersSenior Support ServicesPregnancy Support ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr16%35%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%12%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%4%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%25%10–20yr16%29%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%14%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%22/1,423
the rest of the field
13%
240,374/1,818,142

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

1143 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
320
Early backer (in before they grew)
1101/1143
Grantees still filing
814/1143
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SAMARITAN HEALTH & WELLNESS CENTER INC — $759,100 · HealthSAMARITAN HEALTH & WELLNESS CENTER INCARCARE — $537,954 · HealthSTEPHEN F AUSTIN COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $435,554 · HealthSOUTH TEXAS FAMILY PLANNING & HEALTH CORPORATION — $417,700 · Health+103 more — $8,611,396 · Health+103 moreAMERICARES FREE CLINICS INC — $2,590,000 · OtherAMERICARES FREE CLINICS INCCHRISTUS HEALTH FOUNDATION OF Southeast Texas — $323,193 · OtherUBI CARITAS A HEALING MINISTRY — $301,861 · OtherREFUGIO COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL DISTRICT — $250,000 · Other+58 more — $3,902,199 · Other+58 morePresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $944,042 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $195,139 · EducationUniversity of Chicago — $85,000 · EducationVIRGINIA ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICS INC — $50,500 · EducationILLINOIS ASSOCIATION OF FREE & CHARITABLE CLINICS — $50,500 · Education+3 more — $60,000 · EducationCHRISTIAN CONNECTIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL HEALTH — $323,769 · InternationalAMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID — $215,000 · InternationalHISPANOLA HEALTH PARTNERS — $80,643 · InternationalVOCES COALICION DE INMUNIZACION Y PROMOCIION DE LA SALUD INC — $79,000 · InternationalHEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL INC — $50,000 · InternationalRAZOM INC — $40,000 · InternationalGlobal Response Management Inc — $30,000 · International+1 more — $20,000 · InternationalNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICS INC — $327,000 · Community ImprovementMAYFIELD GRAVES LTRG INC — $290,000 · Community ImprovementINQUIRING SYSTEMS INC — $30,000 · Community ImprovementCOVENANT HOUSE TEXAS — $225,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE FLORIDA INC — $100,000 · Human ServicesHEALTHCARE FOR THE HOMELESS-HOUSTON — $92,985 · Human ServicesHOPE CLINIC AND CARE CENTER INC — $45,000 · Human ServicesONE HUNDRED ANGELS — $35,000 · Human ServicesON EAGLES WINGS INC AKA WOVEN HEALTH CLINIC — $28,750 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA — $27,500 · Human ServicesHelping Hands of Middle & West Tennessee — $25,000 · Human ServicesUNETE INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesHOMELAND PREPAREDNESS PROJECT — $65,000 · Public Safety & DisasterINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DISASTER RESOURCE CENTER INC — $40,000 · Public Safety & DisasterGreater Pine Island Alliance — $20,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Health$10,761,704Other$7,367,253Education$1,385,181International$838,412Community Improvement$647,000Human Services$599,235Public Safety & Disaster$125,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $944,042 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN HEALTH & WELLNESS CENTER INC — $759,100 over 4y, 26% of budgetARCARE — $537,954 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSTEPHEN F AUSTIN COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $435,554 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTH TEXAS FAMILY PLANNING & HEALTH CORPORATION — $417,700 over 7y, 3.1% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICS INC — $327,000 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN CONNECTIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL HEALTH — $323,769 over 1y, 19% of budgetUBI CARITAS A HEALING MINISTRY — $301,861 over 7y, 20% of budgetMEDICAL MISSION ADVENTURES — $300,427 over 3y, 16% of budgetAMERICARES FREE CLINICS INC — $300,000 over 9y, 7.2% of budgetMAYFIELD GRAVES LTRG INC — $290,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetChrist Clinic — $279,714 over 5y, 7.1% of budgetCommunity Health NFP — $243,625 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetCARESOUTH CAROLINA INC — $240,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE TEXAS — $225,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetAMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID — $215,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMATAGORDA EPISCOPAL HEALTH OUTREACH PROGRAM CORPORATION — $212,000 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetAMISTAD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $209,000 over 6y, 3.2% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $200,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $195,139 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIA CHARITABLE CARE NETWORK INC — $188,000 over 3y, 8.4% of budgetTRIANGLE AREA NETWORK INC — $187,500 over 8y, 5.4% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS INC — $186,243 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS OF PINELLAS INC D/B/A EVARA HEALTH — $180,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSHEPHERDS CLINIC INC — $178,875 over 9y, 5.0% of budgetSMITHVILLE COMMUNITY CLINIC — $175,977 over 6y, 40% of budgetIBN SINA FOUNDATION INC — $175,600 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetHEAL THE CITY FREE CLINIC — $170,000 over 7y, 5.4% of budgetAvicenna Free Clinic Inc — $163,105 over 7y, 61% of budgetSWLA CENTER FOR HEALTH SERVICES — $161,740 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetST THOMAS EAST END MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION — $160,800 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetORCHARD HOSPITAL — $160,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLESTONNAC FREE CLINIC — $158,300 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetHEADINGTON INSTITUTE — $150,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetWisconsin Association of Free & Charitab — $148,736 over 3y, 6.7% of budgetMAUI AIDS FOUNDATION INC — $141,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetVIRGINIA B ANDES VOLUNTEER COMMUNITY CLINIC INC — $138,900 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE — $128,750 over 9y, 15% of budgetMOAB FREE HEALTH CLINIC — $124,406 over 5y, 9.7% of budgetEASTER SEALS OF GREATER HOUSTON INC — $120,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetHIGH COUNTRY COMMUNITY HEALTH INC — $120,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMOUNTAIN COMMUNITY HEALTH PARTNERSHIP INC — $120,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE GOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH CENTER INC — $118,750 over 9y, 2.3% of budgetPROJECT VISION HAWAII — $115,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetHEALTH BRIGADE — $110,625 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetBAPTIST HOSPITAL OF SETX FOUNDATION — $110,208 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetALOHA HOUSE INC — $110,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetPEDIPLACE INC — $109,000 over 8y, 2.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Association …Direct ReliefHeart to Heart Intern…Sostento IncAmerican Academy of F…North Carolina Associ…MAP International IncFlorida Association o…Delta Dental Communit…Virginia Association …Pfizer Patient Assist…Georgia Charitable Ca…
National Association of Free and Charitable Clinics IncVA202.1× affinity162 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Association of Free and Charitable Clinics Inc · Direct Relief · Heart to Heart International Inc · Sostento Inc · American Academy of Family Physicians Fdn · North Carolina Association of Free and Charitable Clinics Inc · MAP International Inc · Florida Association of Free and Charitable Clinics Inc · Delta Dental Community Care Foundation · Virginia Association of Free and Charitable Clinics Inc · Pfizer Patient Assistance Foundation Inc · Georgia Charitable Care Network Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Americares Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Easter Seals of Oregon — 77% of income from government
  • North Florida Medical Centers Inc — 33% of income from government
  • Florida Association of Community Health Centers Inc — 17% of income from government
  • La Clinica Del Valle Family Health Care Center Inc — 7% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
  • People's Health and Wellness Clinic — 2% of income from government
  • Covenant House Florida Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
  • Oceana Community Health Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
64report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 356 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines