· Public charity
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Foundation
Aapd foundation supports service education and research that advances the oral health of infants and children through adolescence, including those with special health care needs.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k14 grants · $379k
- $50k–250k13 grants · $1.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COOK CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER | $105,000 |
| KINDERSMILE FOUNDATION | $77,500 |
| BARRIO COMPREHENSIVE FAMILY HEALTH | $75,000 |
| CHILDREN'S DENTAL FOUNDATION | $75,000 |
| CASS COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION | $75,000 |
| COMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE | $75,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE | $75,000 |
| CARIDAD CENTER | $75,000 |
| SALT LAKE DONATED DENTAL SERVICES | $75,000 |
| OAK PARK AND RIVER FOREST INFANT | $75,000 |
| DENTAL AID INC | $75,000 |
| LANCASTER CLEFT PALATE CLINIC | $75,000 |
| VARIETY CARE INC | $75,000 |
| COMMUNITY SMILES DENTAL | $37,500 |
| THE DENVER HEALTH FOUNDATION | $27,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $354k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.
29 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $234k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
WAUKESHA COUNTY COMMUNITY DENTAL CLINIC INC6× · 2018–2025 · $567k · revenue +114%- CCCook Children's Medical Center6× · 2018–2025 · $489k · revenue +104%
- DADENTAL AID5× · 2020–2025 · $274k · revenue +18%
Funded once
- KSKIDS SMILES INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $36k · revenue +40%
- IDINTERFAITH DENTAL CLINIC OF NASHVILLEone grant, 2021 · $27k · revenue +9%
SMILE TRAIN INCone grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +18%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Community health center of snohomish county (chc) provides our diverse communities with access to high quality, affordable primary health care.
To improve the health of our patients and community by providing high quality, cost-effective, culturally sensitive, patient-centered health care.
To maintain a high quality patient care delivery system that provides access to comprehensive health care services, regardless of ability to pay. it is the desire of chccw to treat all patients with the dignity and respect they deserve…
Community health care provides the communities we serve with excellence in patient-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care that is compassionate, affordable, and accessible.
To partner with individuals and families so they can thrive and lead healthier lives by delivering the comprehensive, integrated, and equitable primary healthcare that matters most to them.
To provide the highest quality healthcare for everyone in our communities.
The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.
The full mission of the community health center of franklin county, inc is to maintain a community owned, responsive health center which promotes public health and well-being, and provides comprehensive preventative and primary care…
To provide culturally sensitive, coordinated primary care services emphasizing education, prevention, and advocacy, regardless of one's ability to pay.
Provides primary care, oral health, and behavioral health care, including health education to the community without regard to the ability to pay for services.
To improve the health status of patients and the residents living in the communities surrounding the organization's delivery sites through an organized, comprehensive program of primary care delivery, health education and health-related…
The mission of community health centers is to provide quality and compassionate primary healthcare services to central florida's diverse communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Health Care Center for the Homeless Inc and the most unlike its peers is Lehigh Valley Hospital. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
89 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 89 of the 96 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WAUKESHA COUNTY COMMUNITY DENTAL CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds Cook Children's Medical Center ↗
- Who funds DENTAL AID ↗
- Who funds CASS COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S DENTAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Erie Family Health Center Inc ↗
- Who funds LANCASTER CLEFT PALATE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE ↗
- Who funds Barrio Comprehensive Family Health Care Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Caridad Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Oak Park River Forest Infant Welfare S ↗
- Who funds KIDS COMMUNITY CLINIC OF BURBANK ↗
- Who funds DIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX ↗
- Who funds Variety Care Inc ↗
- Who funds SALT LAKE DONATED DENTAL SERVICES ↗
- Who funds KINDERSMILE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds INFANT WELFARE SOCIETY OF CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds HEALTHY SMILES FOR KIDS OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds ALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S DENTAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds DENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITALS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST JOHN'S COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗
- Who funds Indiana University Foundation ↗
- Who funds PETALUMA HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds DENTAL CONNECTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds EL CENTRO DE CORAZON ↗
- Who funds KIDS SMILES INC ↗
- Who funds ASIAN HEALTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITH DENTAL CLINIC OF NASHVILLE ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds St Bernard Hospital ↗
- Who funds InterCare Community Health Network ↗
- Who funds ETHNE HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HEALTH MINISTRIES CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds AKRON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Delta Dental Community Care Foundation · Direct Relief · American Cancer Society Inc · Reach Out and Read Inc · America's Toothfairy National Children's Oral Health Foundation · American Heart Association Inc · Carequest Foundation Inc · California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn · Americares Foundation Inc · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · California Healthcare Foundation · Oral Health America Americas Fund for Dental Health BK 20-04264
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Health Care Center for the Homeless Inc — 34% of income from government
- Im Sulzbacher Center for the Homeless Inc — 23% of income from government
- Eva's Village Inc — 19% of income from government
- Community Health Centers of Burlington Inc — 17% of income from government
- Variety Care Inc — 9% of income from government
- Central Florida Health Care Inc — 7% of income from government
- Providence Portland Medical Foundation — 5% of income from government
- University of Maryland Baltimore Foundation Inc — 3% of income from government
- Three Lower Counties Community Services Inc — 3% of income from government
- Kindersmile Foundation Inc — 3% of income from government
- Health Care for the Homeless Inc — 2% of income from government
- Caridad Center Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Foundation?
Find your warmest path to American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.