· Public charity
Kaiser Foundation Hospitals
To provide high-quality, affordable health care services to improve the health of our members and the communities we serve.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k43 grants · $343k
- $10k–50k700 grants · $16M
- $50k–250k324 grants · $33M
- $250k+55 grants · $176M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Kaiser Permanente Bernard J Tyson School of Medici | $110,953,269 |
| St Josephs Foundation Of San Joaquin | $24,033,359 |
| National Council For Mental Wellbeing | $5,380,000 |
| Pajaro Valley Healthcare District | $3,100,000 |
| Golden State Warriors Commumity Foundation | $2,916,050 |
| La Clinica De La Raza Inc | $2,628,400 |
| Iehp Foundation | $2,500,000 |
| Regents Of The University Of Cal | $2,233,668 |
| Health Research Inc | $1,243,926 |
| Aliados Health | $770,000 |
| Regents Of The University Of California | $732,902 |
| Alliance For A Healthier Generation Inc | $696,000 |
| Central Valley Health Network Inc | $675,000 |
| San Francisco Community Clinic Consortiu | $675,000 |
| Community Health Partnership Inc | $675,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $35.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 16% of Kaiser Foundation Hospitals’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +68% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
1692 repeat relationships — 914 still active in FY2024, 778 since wound down; 64 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $121M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- KPKAISER PERMANENTE BERNARD J TYSON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INC6× · 2018–2023 · $460M · revenue +164% · 100% of their budget
- SJST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATION OF SAN JOAQUIN8× · 2017–2024 · $86M · revenue +140% · 92% of their budget
- SHSALEM HEALTH4× · 2017–2020 · $10M · revenue +62%
Funded once
- TSTHE SHIRLEY WARE EDUCATION CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $33M · revenue ×48
- HSHAYWARD SISTERS HOSPITAL DBA ST ROSE HOSPITALone grant, 2017 · $3.0M · revenue -6%
- KFKAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTONgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $1.9M · revenue +29%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The California Housing Partnership Corporation creates and preserves affordable and sustainable homes for Californians with low incomes by providing expert financial and policy solutions to nonprofit and public partners.
California Competes: Higher Education for a Strong Economy is a nonpartisan policy and research organization focused on identifying solutions to the states most critical challenges at the intersection of higher education, equity, and the…
Community Housing Sonoma County creates supportive housing communities for people living with disabling conditions, especially veterans.
A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…
Since 1974, Children's Council has been at the heart of early care and education in San Francisco.
Family Violence Law Center ("FVLC") helps diverse communities in Alameda County heal from domestic violence and sexual assault, advocating for justice and healthy relationships. We provide survivor-centered legal and crisis intervention…
To provide our diverse community with access to high quality, affordable primary health care
Mid-city community advocacy network works to build a safe, productive, and healthy community for the residents of city heights and greater san diego through collaboration, advocacy, and organizing.
Fighting for justice and housing by providing legal representation for the homeless and working poor.
To represent county government before the california legislature, administrative agencies and support county government.
Unitedly is a nonprofit organization based in San Mateo County, California. Unitedly was established to ensure Asian families and communities have access to equitable opportunities and resources to thrive in the San Francisco Bay Area.
The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission Area Health Associates and the most unlike its peers is The Tech Interactive. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
1734 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1734 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds KAISER PERMANENTE BERNARD J TYSON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INC ↗
- Who funds EAST BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Latino Medical Association West INC ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATION OF SAN JOAQUIN ↗
- Who funds THE SHIRLEY WARE EDUCATION CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SALEM HEALTH ↗
- Who funds EAT LEARN PLAY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HEALTH RESEARCH INC ↗
- Who funds OCHIN INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OAKLAND PROMISE ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE NAPA VALLEY ↗
- Who funds Project Access Now ↗
- Who funds LA CLINICA DE LA RAZA INC ↗
- Who funds Pajaro Valley Healthcare District Project ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR A HEALTHIER GENERATION INC ↗
- Who funds Public Health Institute ↗
- Who funds Oakland Parks and Recreation Foundation ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & RESEARCH CENTER AT OAKLAND ↗
- Who funds ALIADOS HEALTH ↗
- Who funds HEALTHPARTNERS INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds FRED FINCH YOUTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds HAYWARD SISTERS HOSPITAL DBA ST ROSE HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds Central City Concern ↗
- Who funds GOLDEN STATE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Community Health Partnership Inc ↗
- Who funds San Francisco Community Clinic Consortium ↗
- Who funds THE CALIFORNIA HEALTH CARE SAFETY-NET INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sunlight Giving · Sutter Bay Hospitals · California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn · Scan Health Plan · San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund Inc · United Way of the Bay Area · Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management · Sutter Valley Hospitals · The California Wellness Foundation · Essential Access Health · The California Endowment · California Primary Care Association
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Kaiser Foundation Hospitals funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Inc — 37% of income from government
- Enterprise Community Partners Inc — 22% of income from government
- Sheltercare — 18% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- Central City Concern — 10% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Ochin Inc — 4% of income from government
- The Oregon Community Foundation — 2% of income from government
- Project Access Now — 2% of income from government
- Salem Health — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.