Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Daniels Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$70M
Granted FY2024still arriving
1,593
Grants FY2024still arriving
21
States reached
$2.4M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Education$137MYouth Development$24MHuman Services$20MHealth$18MRecreation & Sports$15MHousing & Shelter$11MCommunity Improvement$10MPhilanthropy$8.3MOther$0
02FY2024 · 1593 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k511 grants · $2.9M
  • $10k–50k805 grants · $15M
  • $50k–250k220 grants · $21M
  • $250k+57 grants · $31M
$14,091
Median grant
21
States reached
$1.4B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YOUNG AMERICANS EDUCATION FOUNDATION$2,406,662
YOUNG AMERICANS EDUCATION FOUNDATION$1,800,000
US CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION$1,750,000
Individual grant recipient$1,750,000
WYO COMPLEX DBA WYO SPORTS RANCH$1,500,000
ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER$1,200,000
ACE SCHOLARSHIPS$1,150,000
COLORADO SCHOOLS FUND$1,000,000
EXCELLENT SCHOOLS NEW MEXICO$900,000
STEP DENVER$750,000
SKILLS ENRICHMENT CENTER$740,000
ARRUPE JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL$700,000
CROSSPURPOSE$600,000
CHARTER FUND INCORPORATED DBA CHARTER SCHOOL GROWTH FUND$500,000
NEW MEXICO MILITARY INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED$500,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $17.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WELLSPRING COMMUNITY: $125k → 3%VIA MOBILITY SERVICES: $200k → 12%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION SHERIDAN COUNTY: $500k → 10%YCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $300k → 9%EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE (ECCLA): $300k → 7%VIA MOBILITY SERVICES: $175k → 12%SENIORS' RESOURCE CENTER INCORPORATED: $200k → 12%RIO GRANDE CHILD DEVELOPMENT & FAMILY SERVICES: $250k → 14%YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES INCORPORATED: $125k → 9%FAMILY TREE INCORPORATED: $225k → 7%FAMILY TREE INCORPORATED: $200k → 7%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CHEYENNE WYOMING INCORPORATED: $175k → 10%HIGH COUNTRY SENIOR CITIZENS: $160k → 17%SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION: $200k → 9%NATRONA COUNTY MEALS ON WHEELS: $125k → 11%SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION: $200k → 9%NATRONA COUNTY MEALS ON WHEELS: $125k → 11%RESPONSE: $250k → 6%CLIMB WYOMING: $150k → 10%CLIMB WYOMING: $125k → 10%CLIMB WYOMING: $125k → 10%EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE (ECCLA): $300k → 7%RESPITE CARE INCORPORATED: $350k → 11%SECOND CHANCE CENTER: $200k → 10%SECOND CHANCE CENTER: $150k → 10%SECOND CHANCE CENTER: $150k → 10%BRIGHT BY THREE: $200k → 12%TRU COMMUNITY CARE: $150k → 12%BRIGHT BY THREE: $150k → 12%BRIDGE HOUSE: $400k → 12%BRIDGE HOUSE: $350k → 12%JEFFCO HUMAN SERVICES FOUNDATION: $200k → 7%TESSA: $125k → 9%MI CASA RESOURCE CENTER: $150k → 12%MI CASA RESOURCE CENTER: $150k → 12%ACTIVATE WORK INC: $150k → 12%ACTIVATE WORK INC: $150k → 12%CATHOLIC CHARITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER INC: $650k → 12%CATHOLIC CHARITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER INC: $250k → 12%LARADON HALL SOCIETY FOR EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN AND ADULTS: $150k → 12%ADVANCE: $1.5M → 12%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN DENVER: $300k → 12%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN DENVER: $200k → 12%ACTIVATE WORK INC: $250k → 12%ACTIVATE WORK INC: $250k → 12%WARREN VILLAGE INCORPORATED: $715k → 12%WARREN VILLAGE INCORPORATED: $225k → 12%WARREN VILLAGE INCORPORATED: $200k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 14% of Daniels Fund’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Daniels Fundlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$211M · 1281 repeat orgs$65M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.

1281 repeat relationships — 982 still active in FY2024, 299 since wound down; 212 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

1281
489

Total granted

$211M
$50M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+15%

Still filing today

33%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YA
    YOUNG AMERICANS EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2024 · $12M · revenue +87% · 89% of their budget
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $5.4M · revenue +76%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF DENVER
    4× · 2020–2023 · $4.5M · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • EM
    Eisenhower Medical Centergraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5.0M · revenue +66%
  • WC
    WYO COMPLEX
    one grant, 2023 · $2.0M · revenue +19%
  • SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
    one grant, 2021 · $1.8M · revenue +8%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fountain Valley School of Colorado

Fountain valley school of colorado provides a transformative curriculum in a supportive environment where students are challenged to think critically, become leaders, and live by our core values: courage, compassion, curiosity,…

Education
2
Education Commission of the States

The mission of education commission of the states is to advocate for attaining educational excellence for all and to help state leaders identify, develop and implement public policy for education that addresses current and future needs of…

Education
3
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
4
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
5
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
6
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
7
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
8
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
9
Claremont Lincoln University

Delivers affordable, accessible, and relevant higher education programs.

Education
10
Western Athletic Conference

The conference is committed to providing student-athletes an exemplary university experience - both on and off the field of play. with high standards of integrity at the core of our athletic and academic excellences, our goal is to unlock…

Recreation & Sports
11
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
12
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mile High United Way Inc and the most unlike its peers is Recruiting Classroom. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Sports ProgramsPolicy Research and AdvocacyYouth Development ServicesAddiction Recovery ServicesIndependent K-12 SchoolsYouth Development CentersCommunity College Foundatio…Volunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Jewish Community Organizati…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Immigrant Worker SupportEquine Therapy ProgramsYouth Mentoring ProgramsPregnancy Support ServicesDomestic Violence ServicesFaith-Based Social ServicesAffordable Housing Construc…Environmental Conservation …Christian Missionary Organi…Animal Rescue and ShelterLocal History MuseumsWomen & Girls Leadership De…School District FoundationsMilitary Veterans SupportSenior Support ServicesDevelopmental Disabilities …Cancer Support ServicesElementary Literacy TutoringYmca Youth DevelopmentUnited Way AffiliatesFood Banks and PantriesAffordable Housing Developm…Community FoundationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Health Access Advocacy and …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%6%<5yr15%9%5–10yr21%18%10–20yr17%19%20–35yr12%21%35–55yr13%27%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%6%<5yr15%6%5–10yr21%15%10–20yr17%17%20–35yr12%24%35–55yr13%32%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.6% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.6%5/881
the rest of the field
13%
4,364/32,536

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

731 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 731 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

48
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
156
Early backer (in before they grew)
721/731
Grantees still filing
507/731
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF UTAH — $3,339,872 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO - BOULDER — $3,298,622 · OtherJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT-ROCKY MOUNTAIN INC — $2,911,000 · Other+88 more — $67,156,424 · Other+88 moreUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION — $5,419,983 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDA…UNIVERSITY OF DENVER — $4,523,755 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF DENVERUS Chamber of Commerce Foundation — $3,871,000 · EducationUS Chamber of Commerce Founda…ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION — $3,181,167 · EducationALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCAT…NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS — $2,710,000 · EducationNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR PUBLIC …Colorado Succeeds — $2,375,000 · EducationExcellent Schools New Mexico — $2,346,257 · EducationColorado Christian University — $2,081,361 · Education+35 more — $21,038,508 · Education+35 moreYOUNG AMERICANS EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $12,032,433 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG AMER…Boys & Girls Club of Central Wyoming — $1,075,300 · Youth DevelopmentBoys & Gir…FULLMER LEGACY FOUNDATION — $1,000,000 · Youth DevelopmentFULLMER LE…INVEST IN KIDS — $700,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE SAN LUIS VALLEY INC — $600,000 · Youth Development+2 more — $775,000 · Youth DevelopmentADVANCE INC — $1,557,000 · Human ServicesWARREN VILLAGE INC — $1,180,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES & COMMUNITY SERV OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER — $971,265 · Human ServicesACTIVATE WORK INC — $800,000 · Human ServicesBridge House — $750,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN DENVER — $600,000 · Human ServicesEARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE INC — $600,000 · Human ServicesTHE SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION — $515,000 · Human ServicesCLIMB DBA CLIMB WYOMING — $500,409 · Human ServicesSecond Chance Center Inc — $500,000 · Human ServicesBRIGHT BEGINNINGS — $500,000 · Human ServicesSheridan County Young Mens Christian Association — $500,000 · Human ServicesBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTHEAST WYOMING INC — $481,100 · Human Services+12 more — $4,334,082 · Human ServicesEisenhower Medical Center — $5,000,000 · HealthHAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION — $1,850,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation — $939,263 · HealthNEW BEGINNING RECOVERY CENTER INC — $450,000 · HealthA Way Out Inc — $400,000 · HealthGLOBAL DOWN SYNDROME FOUNDATION — $380,000 · Health+7 more — $2,293,715 · HealthUTAH'S PROMISE — $1,786,100 · PhilanthropyCHARTER FUND INC D/B/A CHARTER SCHOOL GROWTH FUND — $1,500,000 · PhilanthropyTHE PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE — $1,110,000 · PhilanthropyCOLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION — $1,025,000 · PhilanthropyCOLORADO SCHOOLS FUND — $1,000,000 · PhilanthropyGOLD CROWN FOUNDATION — $800,805 · PhilanthropyVELA EDUCATION FUND — $750,000 · PhilanthropyNEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $640,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF NORTHERN UTAH — $630,000 · PhilanthropyMONTE VISTA COMMUNITY FUND INC — $500,000 · PhilanthropyTEAM UP — $500,000 · PhilanthropyMILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC — $400,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $325,000 · PhilanthropyWYO COMPLEX — $2,000,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE WESTERN STOCK SHOW ASSOCIATION — $1,250,840 · Recreation & SportsUNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION — $800,000 · Recreation & SportsCHANCE SPORTS — $762,838 · Recreation & SportsAthletics & Beyond — $700,104 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPICS COLORADO — $325,000 · Recreation & SportsCOLORADO SPRINGS SPORTS CORPORATION — $300,000 · Recreation & SportsCRESTED BUTTE NORDIC COUNCIL — $282,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$76,705,918Education$47,547,031Youth Development$16,182,733Human Services$13,788,856Health$11,312,978Philanthropy$10,966,905Recreation & Sports$6,420,782

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetYOUNG AMERICANS EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $12,032,433 over 4y, 89% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION — $5,419,983 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetEisenhower Medical Center — $5,000,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER — $4,523,755 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetUS Chamber of Commerce Foundation — $3,871,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION — $3,181,167 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT-ROCKY MOUNTAIN INC — $2,911,000 over 3y, 46% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS — $2,710,000 over 4y, 6.1% of budgetCROSSPURPOSE — $2,407,774 over 4y, 8.2% of budgetColorado Succeeds — $2,375,000 over 4y, 23% of budgetMARKETING & BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND CURRICULUM CENTER — $2,356,365 over 4y, 50% of budgetExcellent Schools New Mexico — $2,346,257 over 4y, 84% of budgetColorado Christian University — $2,081,361 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA NORTHERN ROCKIES — $2,060,000 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetWYO COMPLEX — $2,000,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetHAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION — $1,850,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — $1,800,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOMEWISE INC — $1,800,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetUTAH'S PROMISE — $1,786,100 over 5y, 5.0% of budgetADVANCE INC — $1,557,000 over 2y, 96% of budgetStep Denver — $1,510,759 over 3y, 28% of budgetCHARTER FUND INC D/B/A CHARTER SCHOOL GROWTH FUND — $1,500,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetNew Mexico State Univ Fdn Inc — $1,402,264 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH — $1,338,500 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetBill of Rights Institute — $1,300,000 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PREPARATORY SCHOOLS — $1,270,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetCOLORADO LEAGUE OF CHARTER SCHOOLS — $1,265,000 over 4y, 10% of budgetTHE WESTERN STOCK SHOW ASSOCIATION — $1,250,840 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $1,225,830 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES — $1,225,480 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO FOUNDATION — $1,186,139 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetWARREN VILLAGE INC — $1,180,000 over 4y, 4.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION — $1,136,649 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetTHE PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE — $1,110,000 over 4y, 3.7% of budget50CAN INC — $1,095,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of Central Wyoming — $1,075,300 over 3y, 8.0% of budgetTHE COLORADO NONPROFIT DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $1,065,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetCOLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION — $1,025,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budget5280 HIGH SCHOOL — $1,025,000 over 5y, 10% of budgetFULLMER LEGACY FOUNDATION — $1,000,000 over 2y, 24% of budgetCOLORADO SCHOOLS FUND — $1,000,000 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES & COMMUNITY SERV OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER — $971,265 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetUnited States Olympic and Paralympic Museum — $960,000 over 4y, 7.3% of budgetChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation — $939,263 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetREGIS UNIVERSITY — $922,211 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetGoodwill of Colorado — $809,200 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetGOLD CROWN FOUNDATION — $800,805 over 4y, 7.1% of budgetUNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION — $800,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YOUNG AMERICANS EDUCATION FOUNDATION
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Eisenhower Medical Center
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DENVER
  • Who funds US Chamber of Commerce Foundation
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT-ROCKY MOUNTAIN INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS
  • Who funds CROSSPURPOSE
  • Who funds Colorado Succeeds
  • Who funds MARKETING & BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND CURRICULUM CENTER
  • Who funds Excellent Schools New Mexico
  • Who funds Colorado Christian University
  • Who funds VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA NORTHERN ROCKIES
  • Who funds WYO COMPLEX
  • Who funds HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
  • Who funds HOMEWISE INC
  • Who funds UTAH'S PROMISE
  • Who funds ADVANCE INC
  • Who funds Step Denver
  • Who funds CHARTER FUND INC D/B/A CHARTER SCHOOL GROWTH FUND
  • Who funds New Mexico State Univ Fdn Inc
  • Who funds AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH
  • Who funds Bill of Rights Institute
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PREPARATORY SCHOOLS
  • Who funds COLORADO LEAGUE OF CHARTER SCHOOLS
  • Who funds THE WESTERN STOCK SHOW ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Anschutz FoundationCO136.4× affinity91 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Anschutz Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Temple Hoyne Buell Foundation · Caring for Colorado Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Gates Family Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Adolph Coors Foundation · Kenneth Kendal King Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Daniels Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Tools of the Mind0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
83report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 2000 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph