· Private foundation
Chubb Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3638 grants · $2.2M
- $10k–50k71 grants · $1.2M
- $50k–250k5 grants · $532k
- $250k+5 grants · $2.5M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| National Fish and Wildlife Foundati | $1,000,000 |
| TEACH FOR ALL INC | $500,000 |
| TEACH FOR ALL INC | $375,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE INC | $333,333 |
| COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELI | $250,000 |
| Center for Strategic and Internatio | $150,000 |
| National Committee on United States | $132,168 |
| Eisenhower Exchange Fellowships Inc | $100,000 |
| ST BERNARD PROJECT INC | $100,000 |
| St John's University-Greenberg Scho | $50,000 |
| IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $40,000 |
| WATERISLIFE GLOBAL INC | $40,000 |
| ST JOSEPH'S PREPARATORY SCHOOL | $40,000 |
| REVIVED SOLDIERS UKRAINE | $40,000 |
| AGAPE PAMOJA INC | $40,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
1411 repeat relationships — 723 still active in FY2024, 688 since wound down; 174 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC4× · 2020–2023 · $2.3M · revenue +53%- IRInternational Rescue Committee INC6× · 2019–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +67%
- IMINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS5× · 2019–2023 · $1.8M · revenue +81%
Funded once
- TRTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITYone grant, 2020 · $1.0M · revenue +1%
- CBCHINA BUSINESS FORUMone grant, 2020 · $780k
- TATHE AMERICAN INDIA FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $501k · revenue +68%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
See schedule ouniversity of new haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts & professional education.
A higher educational institution, providing both undergraduate and graduate degrees.
Uniting communities to alleviate hunger.
Founded 131 years ago, the boston architectural college is a recognized institution providing excellence in practice-integrated design education to members of diverse communities with students representing 35 countries. the bac offers…
Furman university is an institution of higher education providing distinctive undergraduate education emphasizing an engaged approach combining classroom learning with real world experiences and self-discovery.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
See schedule o the philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.
The university is an independent coeducational four-year university, which offers master's, bachelor's, and associate's degrees to approx. 3,000 full time equiv students.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Advancing health through research, education, clinical practice, and community partnerships; providing each person the best care in the right place, at the right time, every time.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Healthright 360 and the most unlike its peers is Autry Museum of the American West. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
1554 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1554 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TEACH FOR ALL INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS ↗
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
- Who funds The Global FoodBanking Network ↗
- Who funds ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CHINA BUSINESS FORUM ↗
- Who funds Eisenhower Exchange Fellowships Incorporated ↗
- Who funds RAINFOREST TRUST ↗
- Who funds HARLEM EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES FUND INC ↗
- Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN INDIA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds GOFUNDMEORG ↗
- Who funds ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC ↗
- Who funds BAPS CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds PER SCHOLAS INC ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
- Who funds New York City Partnership Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR STRATEGIC AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES ↗
- Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF NOTRE-DAME DE PARIS INC ↗
- Who funds IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY ↗
- Who funds ACTIONAID USA ↗
- Who funds EPIC CURE INC ↗
- Who funds AGAPE PAMOJA INC ↗
- Who funds Northwestern University ↗
- Who funds STUDENTSPONSOR PARTNERS INC ↗
- Who funds Revived Soldiers Ukraine ↗
- Who funds SHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds INSURANCE INDUSTRY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Cigna Group Foundation · Lindback Cr & Mf Foundation Tw Main · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · Wsfs Cares Foundation · Connelly Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · The Tyler Foundation · W W Smith Charitable Trust · The Cedarcrest Charitable Foundation Aka Blbb Charitable · The Maguire Foundation · The Gordon Charter Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Chubb Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- Community Servings Inc — 12% of income from government
- Music Workshop — 10% of income from government
- United Way of Hunterdon County — 10% of income from government
- Nlt Academy Inc — 9% of income from government
- Freedom House Inc — 4% of income from government
- Cornerstone Family Programs — 3% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston College — 3% of income from government
- Shatterproof a Nonprofit Corporation — 2% of income from government
- Fairfield University — 1% of income from government
- New Jersey Performing Arts Center Corporation — 0% of income from government
- Drew University — 0% of income from government
- Food for the Poor Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Chubb Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Chubb Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.