Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York

Columbia university is one of the world's most important centers of research and at the same time a distinctive and distinguished learning environment for undergraduates and graduate students in many scholarly and professional fields.

$996M
Granted FY2025still arriving
414
Grants FY2025still arriving
50
States reached
$15M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$495MScience & Tech$416MEducation$250MYouth Development$14MInternational$14MSocial Science$9.2MRecreation & Sports$7.7MPhilanthropy$7.4MOther$0
02FY2025 · 414 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 414 grants below total $207,923,433 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $996,042,617 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $788,119,184 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k30 grants · $217k
  • $10k–50k110 grants · $2.7M
  • $50k–250k125 grants · $14M
  • $250k+149 grants · $191M
$109,686
Median grant
50
States reached
$26.0B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH CARE INC$15,058,790
GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$10,983,372
WEILL MEDICAL COLLEGE$6,911,928
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY$4,789,021
UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM$4,356,700
TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVAN$3,838,702
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$3,767,132
ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI$3,698,548
MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA$3,572,368
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STA THE$3,189,219
NEW YORK GENOME CTR INC$3,175,195
CORNELL UNIVERSITY$3,037,493
RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR THE STATE U THE$2,846,640
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$2,809,168
KNIGHT FIRST AMENDMENT INSTITUTE AT COLUMBIA$2,741,621
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $281k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BROTHERHOOD INC: $120k → 23%SDSN ASSOCIATION: $161k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1B · 601 repeat orgs$16M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.

601 repeat relationships — 345 still active in FY2025, 256 since wound down; 55 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

601
240

Total granted

$1.1B
$12M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+9%

Still filing today

70%
77%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesScience & TechInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CU
    Columbia University Health Care Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $75M · revenue +64% · 37% of their budget
  • RF
    RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $32M · revenue +70%
  • TG
    The George Washington University
    9× · 2017–2025 · $24M · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • UO
    University of Washington
    one grant, 2023 · $1.9M
  • NY
    NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
    one grant, 2017 · $709k
  • AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $651k · revenue +53%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
4
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
9
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
The Graduate Center Foundation Inc

The graduate center foundation is committed to promoting and safe-guarding the success of the graduate center by raising funds and managing and investing donations for use by the graduate center. the board of trustees of the foundation…

12
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Health International Inc and the most unlike its peers is Usa-World Congress of Pediatric Cardiology and Cardiatric Surgery. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsHealth Access Advocacy and …Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Military Veterans SupportCommunity College Foundatio…Pregnancy Support ServicesEnvironmental Conservation …Local History MuseumsDance Arts OrganizationsLocal Food System Organizat…Youth Development ServicesSchool District FoundationsChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Youth Sports ProgramsYouth Development CentersElementary Literacy TutoringIndependent K-12 SchoolsLgbtq+ Community SupportWomen & Girls Leadership De…Affordable Housing Developm…Domestic Violence ServicesSenior Support ServicesOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Community Arts CentersCancer Support ServicesPolicy Research and AdvocacyChristian Missionary Organi…Jewish Community Organizati…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%17%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr13%20%35–55yr16%36%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr16%15%20–35yr13%12%35–55yr16%58%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.8% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.8%7/918
the rest of the field
13%
240,391/1,818,647

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

684 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 684 of the 918 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

18
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
88
Early backer (in before they grew)
667/684
Grantees still filing
468/684
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Weill Medical College of Cornell Univers — $53,396,985 · OtherWeill Medical College of Cornell UniversUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO — $32,905,618 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCOREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN — $17,654,925 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT SAN DIEGO — $16,366,677 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM — $15,310,871 · Other+82 more — $323,497,269 · Other+82 moreThe George Washington University — $23,736,942 · EducationThe George Washington UniversityNew York University — $23,205,222 · EducationNew York UniversityICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $22,837,663 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINA…JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $21,848,421 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $18,701,827 · EducationThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York — $16,847,723 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITY — $14,733,298 · EducationResearch Foundation of the City University of New York — $14,638,733 · EducationUniversity of Chicago — $14,625,312 · EducationKnight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University Inc — $14,101,144 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $13,640,184 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $13,294,504 · Education+42 more — $169,835,785 · Education+42 moreColumbia University Health Care Inc — $74,528,107 · HealthColumbia University Heal…RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE INC — $31,679,573 · HealthRESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR …MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $12,899,409 · HealthNEW YORK BLOOD CENTER INC — $12,229,967 · HealthNEW YORK GENOME CENTER INC — $9,837,937 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $8,487,982 · Health+39 more — $100,089,623 · Health+39 moreWOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION — $3,488,738 · Science & TechBATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE — $3,165,121 · Science & TechCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY — $2,651,018 · Science & TechUniversity of Kansas Center for Research Inc — $1,549,425 · Science & TechMARINE BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY — $1,388,968 · Science & TechSAGE BIONETWORKS — $1,184,409 · Science & TechTHE SCINTILLON INSTITUTE — $1,182,818 · Science & TechINSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDY - LOUIS BAMBERGER & MRS FELIX FULD FOUNDATION — $1,010,596 · Science & TechResearch Triangle Institute — $906,998 · Science & TechReid Hall Inc — $13,341,138 · InternationalTHE MILLENNIUM PROMISE ALLIANCE INC — $1,749,200 · InternationalNorthwestern University — $9,679,316 · Recreation & SportsVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM — $5,615,131 · PhilanthropyKENNEDY HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC — $1,357,940 · Philanthropy
Other$459,132,345Education$382,046,758Health$249,752,598Science & Tech$16,528,091International$15,090,338Recreation & Sports$9,679,316Philanthropy$6,973,071

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetColumbia University Health Care Inc — $74,528,107 over 8y, 37% of budgetRESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE INC — $31,679,573 over 9y, 2.4% of budgetThe George Washington University — $23,736,942 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetNew York University — $23,205,222 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $22,837,663 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $21,848,421 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $18,701,827 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York — $16,847,723 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $14,733,298 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetResearch Foundation of the City University of New York — $14,638,733 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $14,625,312 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetKnight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University Inc — $14,101,144 over 7y, 83% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $13,640,184 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetReid Hall Inc — $13,341,138 over 7y, 97% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $13,294,504 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $12,899,409 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetYale University — $12,546,330 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK BLOOD CENTER INC — $12,229,967 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $12,068,303 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $11,536,407 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami — $11,287,841 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK GENOME CENTER INC — $9,837,937 over 8y, 3.6% of budgetNorthwestern University — $9,679,316 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAlbert Einstein College of Medicine — $9,532,033 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine — $9,200,396 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCornell University — $8,752,558 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $8,487,982 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $8,127,383 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetRush University Medical Center — $7,988,632 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University — $7,226,614 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY — $7,120,378 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $6,532,053 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation — $6,524,378 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTH RESEARCH INC — $6,392,494 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetKAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS — $6,239,303 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $5,734,292 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM — $5,615,131 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY — $5,137,068 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University — $5,094,538 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTeachers College Columbia University — $4,940,438 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA DARDEN SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $4,920,074 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetThe Rand Corporation — $4,727,001 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE INC — $4,636,415 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago — $4,631,565 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $4,493,577 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FEINSTEIN INSTITUTES FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH — $4,406,220 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF COLUMBIA SECONDARY SCHOOL FOR MATH SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING INC — $4,374,195 over 9y, 92% of budgetThe Hebrew Home for Aged at Riverdale — $4,353,007 over 8y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Columbia University Health Care Inc
  • Who funds RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE INC
  • Who funds The George Washington University
  • Who funds New York University
  • Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
  • Who funds The Research Foundation for The State University of New York
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Research Foundation of the City University of New York
  • Who funds University of Chicago
  • Who funds Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University Inc
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Reid Hall Inc
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
  • Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER
  • Who funds Yale University
  • Who funds NEW YORK BLOOD CENTER INC
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College
  • Who funds University of Miami
  • Who funds NEW YORK GENOME CENTER INC
  • Who funds Northwestern University
  • Who funds Albert Einstein College of Medicine
  • Who funds Baylor College of Medicine

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cornell UniversityNY92.8× affinity61 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cornell University · Yale University · West Harlem Development Corporation · Vanderbilt University Medical Center · American Chemical Society · University of Pittsburgh · The New York and Presbyterian Hospital · Johns Hopkins University · The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · University of Southern California · University of Miami · President and Fellows of Harvard College

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine100% of income from government
  • Jhpiego Corporation65% of income from government
  • Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution63% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology35% of income from government
  • Medstar Health Research Institute Inc25% of income from government
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation23% of income from government
  • Marine Biological Laboratory20% of income from government
  • The Broad Institute Inc19% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College13% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University12% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University12% of income from government
  • The Trustees of the Stevens Institute of Technology12% of income from government
  • Yale University12% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University11% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation10% of income from government
  • Brandeis University9% of income from government
  • Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation7% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College7% of income from government
  • Northeastern University7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc6% of income from government
  • University of Miami5% of income from government
  • Christiana Care Health Services Inc1% of income from government
  • The Trustees of the Smith College1% of income from government
  • The Cooper Health System a New Jersey Non-Profit Corporation0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 918 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph