Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

University of Pittsburgh

The UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH, founded in 1787, is one of the oldest institutions of higher education in the united states and one of the nation's top public research universities.

$473M
Granted FY2025still arriving
397
Grants FY2025still arriving
47
States reached
$7.9M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Science & Tech$745MHealth$247MEducation$24MHousing & Shelter$9.0MCommunity Improvement$6.4MSocial Science$2.1MInternational$2.0MHuman Services$1.7MOther$0
02FY2025 · 397 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 397 grants below total $149,101,135 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $473,249,493 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $324,148,358 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k41 grants · $287k
  • $10k–50k123 grants · $2.8M
  • $50k–250k116 grants · $14M
  • $250k+117 grants · $132M
$85,782
Median grant
47
States reached
$10.9B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY$7,927,252
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA$7,469,449
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS$7,084,326
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$3,933,882
TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY$3,650,442
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY$2,774,645
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL$2,760,358
INDIANA UNIVERSITY$2,745,469
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL$2,221,932
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$2,189,916
TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$2,003,803
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY$1,992,854
MAGEE-WOMENS RESEARCH INSTITUTE AND FOUNDATION$1,955,156
HARVARD UNIVERSITY$1,920,464
VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER$1,845,112
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $9.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%KESSLER FOUNDATION: $211k → 16%KESSLER FOUNDATION: $174k → 16%TIDES CENTER: $147k → 10%INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH INNOVATION: $100k → 14%URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $100k → 11%CHAPIN HALL CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $87k → 14%URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $90k → 11%URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $87k → 11%COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES CORP: $1.1M → 11%COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES CORP: $1.1M → 11%COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES CORP: $1.1M → 11%COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES CORP: $975k → 11%COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES CORP: $960k → 11%COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES CORP: $952k → 11%COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES CORP: $928k → 11%COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES CORP: $906k → 11%COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES CORP: $872k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$950M · 555 repeat orgs$6.5M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

555 repeat relationships — 362 still active in FY2025, 193 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

555
252

Total granted

$950M
$6.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+20%

Still filing today

58%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $383k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesScience & TechCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    Carnegie Mellon University
    9× · 2017–2025 · $71M · revenue +15%
  • NY
    New York University
    9× · 2017–2025 · $33M · revenue +76%
  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $26M · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • EW
    Ewald & Wasserman Research Consultants
    one grant, 2018 · $300k
  • AS
    ASCENSION SETON
    one grant, 2022 · $268k · revenue +17%
  • CR
    CHILDRENS RESEARCH INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2017 · $263k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
3
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

4
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
University of Maryland Neurosurgeryassociates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Education
6
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
University of Maryland Physicians Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

8
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
University of Maryland Neurology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

11
University of Maryland Oncology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
12
University of Maryland Otorhino-Laryngology-Head & Neck Surgery Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Montefiore Medical Center and the most unlike its peers is Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsHealth Access Advocacy and …Pregnancy Support ServicesPolicy Research and AdvocacyPublic Library OperationsAnimal Rescue and ShelterImmigrant Worker SupportFood Banks and PantriesIndependent K-12 SchoolsOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Youth Sports ProgramsSenior Support ServicesDevelopmental Disabilities …Community Arts CentersAffordable Housing Construc…Community FoundationsLgbtq+ Community SupportJewish Community Organizati…United Way AffiliatesWomen & Girls Leadership De…Affordable Housing Developm…Military Veterans SupportCancer Support ServicesCommunity College Foundatio…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr16%20%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr16%36%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%12%10–20yr16%17%20–35yr13%19%35–55yr16%52%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.6% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.6%5/829
the rest of the field
13%
240,392/1,818,736

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

499 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 499 of the 839 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

16
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
51
Early backer (in before they grew)
482/499
Grantees still filing
368/499
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Carnegie Mellon University — $71,054,615 · OtherCarnegie Mellon UniversityREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA — $39,675,506 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIAREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN — $30,041,878 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS — $18,516,310 · Other+95 more — $357,626,326 · Other+95 moreNew York University — $33,279,573 · EducationNew York UniversityWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $25,724,313 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITYJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $24,709,848 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $18,415,362 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard …TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $12,639,459 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $12,094,363 · EducationNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY — $11,707,540 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $10,861,071 · EducationUniversity of Chicago — $10,172,730 · EducationWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION — $9,980,128 · EducationYale University — $9,978,466 · Education+35 more — $104,829,149 · Education+35 moreAMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY — $12,290,103 · HealthAMERICAN COLLEGE …HEALTH RESEARCH INC — $11,978,891 · HealthHEALTH RESEARCH I…Vanderbilt University Medical Center — $11,668,846 · HealthVanderbilt Univer…MAGEE-WOMENS RESEARCH INSTITUTE AND FOUNDATION — $8,664,111 · HealthMAGEE-WOMENS RESE…UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $6,952,048 · HealthThe Broad Institute Inc — $6,033,325 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $5,281,437 · HealthMAYO CLINIC — $5,244,706 · Health+39 more — $79,799,075 · Health+39 moreCOMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES CORPORATION — $8,792,585 · Human ServicesFOCUS ON RENEWAL STO-ROX NEIGHBORHOOD CORPORATION — $4,123,641 · Community ImprovementBROWN UNIVERSITY — $2,310,421 · Community ImprovementNorthwestern University — $6,296,220 · Recreation & SportsGENEVA FOUNDATION — $2,501,987 · Science & TechThe Salk Institute for Biological Studies — $1,389,760 · Science & TechJ CRAIG VENTER INSTITUTE — $1,057,438 · Science & TechUniversity of Kansas Center for Research Inc — $759,264 · Science & Tech
Other$516,914,635Education$284,392,002Health$147,912,542Human Services$8,792,585Community Improvement$6,434,062Recreation & Sports$6,296,220Science & Tech$5,708,449

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCarnegie Mellon University — $71,054,615 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetNew York University — $33,279,573 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $25,724,313 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $24,709,848 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $18,415,362 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetThe Consortium for Public Education — $13,661,928 over 9y, 54% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $12,639,459 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY — $12,290,103 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $12,094,363 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTH RESEARCH INC — $11,978,891 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY — $11,707,540 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetVanderbilt University Medical Center — $11,668,846 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $10,861,071 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $10,379,962 over 9y, 19% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $10,172,730 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION — $9,980,128 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetYale University — $9,978,466 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES CORPORATION — $8,792,585 over 9y, 11% of budgetMAGEE-WOMENS RESEARCH INSTITUTE AND FOUNDATION — $8,664,111 over 9y, 3.1% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $8,627,184 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE — $8,015,527 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education — $7,782,369 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $7,408,721 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $6,952,048 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $6,899,081 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University — $6,296,220 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetThe Broad Institute Inc — $6,033,325 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetAlbert Einstein College of Medicine Student Housing Co Inc — $5,811,004 over 9y, 15% of budgetEmory University — $5,715,553 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $5,374,463 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $5,281,437 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $5,244,706 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTurtle Creek Valley Mental HealthMental Retardation Inc — $4,748,133 over 9y, 4.3% of budgetUNeHealth — $4,746,495 over 9y, 8.7% of budgetRush University Medical Center — $4,712,086 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $4,456,059 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation — $4,161,881 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFOCUS ON RENEWAL STO-ROX NEIGHBORHOOD CORPORATION — $4,123,641 over 9y, 26% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine — $4,020,794 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHENRY M JACKSON FOUNDATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MILITARY MEDICINE — $3,979,640 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTHE JACKSON LABORATORY — $3,942,629 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetVanderbilt University — $3,861,284 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER — $3,851,636 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $3,801,835 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWilliam Marsh Rice University — $3,471,873 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $3,382,475 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCOPD FOUNDATION INC — $3,360,736 over 4y, 14% of budgetVETERANS HEALTH FOUNDATION — $3,349,487 over 9y, 22% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Carnegie Mellon University
  • Who funds New York University
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College
  • Who funds The Consortium for Public Education
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
  • Who funds AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
  • Who funds HEALTH RESEARCH INC
  • Who funds NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University Medical Center
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
  • Who funds OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds University of Chicago
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION
  • Who funds Yale University
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES CORPORATION
  • Who funds MAGEE-WOMENS RESEARCH INSTITUTE AND FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE
  • Who funds Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education
  • Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanderbilt University Medical CenterTN75.2× affinity47 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanderbilt University Medical Center · The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York · Washington University · Emory University · Trustees of Boston University · Upmc Group · Cornell University · The George Washington University · Yale University · Northwestern University · Carnegie Mellon University · Mayo Clinic

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization University of Pittsburgh funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine100% of income from government
  • Oregon Research Institute100% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology35% of income from government
  • University of Delaware30% of income from government
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation23% of income from government
  • The Broad Institute Inc19% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College13% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University12% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University12% of income from government
  • Yale University12% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University11% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation10% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College7% of income from government
  • Northeastern University7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc6% of income from government
  • University of Miami5% of income from government
  • Christiana Care Health Services Inc1% of income from government
  • Oregon Health & Science University Foundation1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 839 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph