Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

$791M
Granted FY2025still arriving
237
Grants FY2025still arriving
36
States reached
$5.4M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Science & Tech$207MHealth$169MEducation$53MHuman Services$8.6MRecreation & Sports$1.9MSocial Science$1.5MCommunity Improvement$1.4MAnimals$1.3MOther$0
02FY2025 · 237 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 237 grants below total $67,564,693 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $791,373,249 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $723,808,556 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $101k
  • $10k–50k76 grants · $2.0M
  • $50k–250k90 grants · $10M
  • $250k+58 grants · $55M
$73,623
Median grant
36
States reached
$8.9B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC$5,430,881
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES$5,000,000
CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY$3,248,719
THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$2,945,539
SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION$2,877,422
WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE$2,172,020
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA BOARD OF TRUSTEES$2,123,672
FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES$1,406,996
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL$1,350,564
EMORY UNIVERSITY$1,304,919
THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH$1,241,976
UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM$1,211,777
NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY INC$1,182,810
MIAMI-DADE AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INC$1,023,529
THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO$916,624
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $9.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%REBEL RECOVERY FLORIDA INC: $59k → 11%REBEL RECOVERY FLORIDA INC: $46k → 11%FAMILY CENTRAL INC: $1.2M → 13%FAMILY CENTRAL INC: $871k → 13%FAMILY CENTRAL INC: $844k → 13%FAMILY CENTRAL INC: $780k → 13%JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $652k → 13%JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $560k → 13%JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $494k → 13%AIDS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $26k → 14%AIDS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $18k → 14%FAMILY CENTRAL INC: $228k → 13%LIVE HEALTHY LITTLE HAVANA INC: $88k → 15%FAMILY CENTRAL INC: $924k → 15%FAMILY CENTRAL INC: $880k → 15%JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $670k → 15%JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $499k → 15%JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $489k → 15%JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $99k → 15%TRANSSOCIAL INC: $61k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$384M · 341 repeat orgs$11M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.

341 repeat relationships — 195 still active in FY2025, 146 since wound down; 34 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

341
88

Total granted

$384M
$4.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+16%

Still filing today

54%
74%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationScience & TechHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HM
    HENRY M JACKSON FOUNDATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MILITARY MEDICINE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $37M · revenue +21%
  • SJ
    SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $25M · revenue +61%
  • EU
    Emory University
    9× · 2017–2025 · $22M · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • TJ
    THE JOHNSON HOME
    one grant, 2017 · $468k · revenue -99%
  • PA
    PALO ALTO RESEARCH CENTER INC
    one grant, 2017 · $444k
  • PA
    PALO ALTO RESEARCH CENTER INC
    one grant, 2018 · $386k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
2
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
3
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
4
University of Florida Health Corporation

UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…

5
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
6
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
7
The Florida International University Health Care Network Inc

Fiu health care network's mission is to improve and support medical education at the fiu herbert wertheim college of medicine and provide clinical support services to the larger fiu community.

8
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
9
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
10
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
12
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Health Choice Network Inc and the most unlike its peers is Khaled Bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Health Access Advocacy and …Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Jewish Community Organizati…Environmental Conservation …Immigrant Worker SupportYouth Development ServicesAddiction Recovery ServicesPolicy Research and AdvocacyVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Women & Girls Leadership De…Independent K-12 SchoolsPregnancy Support ServicesCommunity FoundationsUnited Way AffiliatesCancer Support ServicesMilitary Veterans SupportCommunity College Foundatio…Local History Museums
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr16%36%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%12%10–20yr16%5%20–35yr13%44%35–55yr16%36%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.6% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.6%3/476
the rest of the field
13%
240,394/1,819,089

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

287 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 287 of the 476 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
40
Early backer (in before they grew)
283/287
Grantees still filing
216/287
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $31,316,162 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE C…SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $25,006,704 · EducationSAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATIO…Emory University — $22,015,877 · EducationEmory UniversityTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $15,269,405 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIANova Southeastern University Inc — $11,238,732 · EducationNova Southeastern University IncCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $11,068,535 · EducationCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITYMOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE — $8,728,386 · Education+33 more — $46,767,782 · Education+33 moreUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA — $18,603,064 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDAFLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY — $10,078,586 · OtherFLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY+111 more — $125,905,656 · Other+111 moreHENRY M JACKSON FOUNDATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MILITARY MEDICINE — $36,558,692 · HealthHENRY M JACKSON FOUNDAT…MIAMI-DADE AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INC — $6,412,043 · HealthMIAMI-DADE AREA HEALTH …FLORIDA KEYS AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INC — $5,471,822 · HealthFLORIDA KEYS AREA HEALT…RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTH — $5,000,000 · HealthRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE C…+36 more — $35,392,977 · Health+36 moreFAMILY CENTRAL INC — $5,696,396 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $3,462,019 · Human ServicesPHILLIP AND PATRICIA FROST MUSEUM OF SCIENCE INC — $4,520,214 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC — $392,882 · Arts & CultureSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — $367,952 · Arts & CultureSouth Florida Veterans Affairs Foundation For Research & Education Inc — $1,714,529 · Public BenefitNorthwestern University — $1,699,655 · Recreation & Sports
Education$171,411,583Other$154,587,306Health$88,835,534Human Services$9,158,415Arts & Culture$5,281,048Public Benefit$1,714,529Recreation & Sports$1,699,655

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHENRY M JACKSON FOUNDATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MILITARY MEDICINE — $36,558,692 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $31,316,162 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $25,006,704 over 9y, 5.7% of budgetEmory University — $22,015,877 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $15,269,405 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNova Southeastern University Inc — $11,238,732 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $11,068,535 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetMOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE — $8,728,386 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetMIAMI-DADE AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INC — $6,412,043 over 9y, 90% of budgetFAMILY CENTRAL INC — $5,696,396 over 7y, 5.9% of budgetFLORIDA KEYS AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INC — $5,471,822 over 9y, 41% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES — $5,263,948 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPHILLIP AND PATRICIA FROST MUSEUM OF SCIENCE INC — $4,520,214 over 7y, 10% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $4,058,566 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $3,871,620 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $3,632,562 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $3,462,019 over 7y, 2.2% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $3,433,270 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $2,821,751 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $2,727,716 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $2,302,817 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $2,294,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetVanderbilt University Medical Center — $2,126,945 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $1,966,805 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Health of South Florida Inc — $1,927,378 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $1,813,556 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $1,785,925 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York — $1,772,439 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAlbert Einstein College of Medicine — $1,723,353 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSouth Florida Veterans Affairs Foundation For Research & Education Inc — $1,714,529 over 8y, 18% of budgetSAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION SDSU RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $1,706,585 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetNorthwestern University — $1,699,655 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUSF RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $1,642,554 over 4y, 5.1% of budgetH LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE HOSPITAL INC — $1,582,395 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $1,448,135 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS — $1,432,828 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetGATEWAY COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $1,427,595 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetMonterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute — $1,334,850 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetYale University — $1,250,479 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $1,249,303 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetFENWAY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC — $1,201,255 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetThe Florida Aquarium Inc — $1,178,934 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetHEALTH RESEARCH INC — $1,168,583 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND — $1,063,734 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR FAMILY & CHILD ENRICHMENT INC — $911,196 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetUNIVERSIDAD CENTRAL DEL CARIBE — $910,931 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $905,743 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA ALLIANCE FOR ASSISTIVE SERVICES & TECHNOLOGY INC — $899,321 over 9y, 12% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HENRY M JACKSON FOUNDATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MILITARY MEDICINE
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
  • Who funds SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Emory University
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
  • Who funds Nova Southeastern University Inc
  • Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
  • Who funds MIAMI-DADE AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INC
  • Who funds FAMILY CENTRAL INC
  • Who funds FLORIDA KEYS AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INC
  • Who funds WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTH
  • Who funds PHILLIP AND PATRICIA FROST MUSEUM OF SCIENCE INC
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New YorkNY64.3× affinity37 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York · Vanderbilt University Medical Center · Northwestern University · University of Pittsburgh · University of Southern California · Yale University · Washington University · Emory University · The Miami Foundation Inc · Johns Hopkins University · The George Washington University · Cornell University

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization University of Miami funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine100% of income from government
  • University of Delaware30% of income from government
  • Fenway Community Health Center Inc27% of income from government
  • Medstar Health Research Institute Inc25% of income from government
  • Community Health of South Florida Inc22% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University12% of income from government
  • Yale University12% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University11% of income from government
  • Center for Family & Child Enrichment Inc10% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation10% of income from government
  • Brandeis University9% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
  • Gateway Community Services Inc6% of income from government
  • Mote Marine Laboratory Inc4% of income from government
  • Care Resource Community Health Centers Incorporated4% of income from government
  • H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute Hospital Inc3% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College3% of income from government
  • Health Choice Network Inc2% of income from government
  • Nova Southeastern University Inc2% of income from government
  • Latinos Salud Inc2% of income from government
  • Phillip and Patricia Frost Museum of Science Inc1% of income from government
  • Jewish Community Services of South Florida Inc1% of income from government
  • Variety Children's Hospital1% of income from government
  • Hartford Hospital0% of income from government
  • The Florida Aquarium Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 476 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph