Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Public Health Institute

Public Health Institute generates and promotes research, leadership and partnerships to build capacity for strong public health policy, programs, systems and practices.

$60M
Granted FY2024still arriving
445
Grants FY2024still arriving
37
States reached
$1.6M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$160MScience & Tech$38MEducation$25MHousing & Shelter$23MHuman Services$20MCommunity Improvement$19MEmployment$11MInternational$6.5MOther$0
02FY2024 · 445 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k32 grants · $234k
  • $10k–50k145 grants · $3.2M
  • $50k–250k199 grants · $19M
  • $250k+69 grants · $36M
$70,120
Median grant
37
States reached
$133M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMONSPIRIT HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE$1,575,000
KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS$939,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA$781,597
LAUSD STUDENT HEALTH SERVICES SUPPORT$778,400
AMAAD INSTITUTE$778,400
CORE COMMUNITY ORGANIZED RELIEF EFFORT$778,400
SACRAMENTO LGBT COMMUNITY CENTER$778,400
SPECIAL SERVICE FOR GROUPS INC$778,400
THE ALLIANCE FOR COMMUNITY WELLNESS$778,400
DIVINE TRUTH UNITY FELLOWSHIP CHURCH INC$778,400
AFRICAN COMMUNITIES PUBLIC HEALTH$778,400
INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC STRATEGIES$778,400
LTSC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$777,922
RYSE INC$776,393
HEALING EARLY ADVERSE RELATIONSHIPS TRANSFORMING SYSTEMS$773,715
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $14.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LATINO HEALTH ACCESS: $505k → 10%CHICANO FEDERATION OF SAN DIEGO: $250k → 11%TIDES CENTER: $288k → 12%SISKIYOU COMMUNITY RESOURCE: $315k → 16%VALLEY ONWARD: $380k → 19%COOK COUNTY FAMILY CONNECTION INC: $400k → 21%LATINO HEALTH ACCESS: $265k → 10%TRAINING INSTITUTE FOR LEADERSHIP: $270k → 10%EL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $584k → 14%JAKARA MOVEMENT: $328k → 19%CHICANO FEDERATION OF SAN DIEGO: $100k → 11%HAVEN WOMEN'S CENTER STANISLAUS: $205k → 15%CENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES: $220k → 15%EL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $366k → 14%HAVEN WOMEN'S CENTER STANISLAUS: $167k → 15%WORLD PULSE VOICES: $201k → 12%ASPIRANET: $604k → 7%INTERFACE CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $196k → 10%WORLD PULSE VOICES: $143k → 12%HAVEN WOMEN'S CENTER STANISLAUS: $166k → 15%INFINITE GIVING INC: $180k → 12%LATINO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $350k → 10%LOCAL INDIANS FOR EDUCATION INC: $163k → 14%THE AMELIA ANN ADAMS WHOLE LIFE CENTER: $300k → 12%MIXTECOINDIGENA COMMUNITY: $200k → 10%EL CONCILIO FAMILY SERVICES: $125k → 10%EXCEPTIONAL PARENTS UNLIMITED: $225k → 19%FRESNO METROPOLITAN MINISTRY: $100k → 19%INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH INNOVATION: $100k → 14%CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTERS: $300k → 12%RESOURCES FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING: $100k → 12%SOUTHWEST COMMUNITY CORPORATION: $130k → 10%UNION OF PAN ASIAN COMMUNITIES: $175k → 11%MULTI-ETHNIC COLLABORATIVE OF COMMUNITY: $200k → 10%ROSE FAMILY CREATIVE EMPOWERMENT CENTER: $151k → 12%MUSLIM AMERICAN SOCIETY OF SACRAMENTO: $180k → 12%LA FAMILIA COUNSELING CENTER INC: $170k → 12%EL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $401k → 14%SOMALI FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $175k → 11%TIDES CENTER: $325k → 10%ASIAN YOUTH CENTER: $101k → 14%VALLEY CARE COMMUNITY CONSORITUM: $109k → 14%SPECIAL SERVICE FOR GROUPS INC: $778k → 14%ASIAN PACIFIC POLICY & PLANNING COUNCIL: $350k → 14%SUCCESS IN CHALLENGES INC: $153k → 14%SPECIAL SERVICE FOR GROUPS INC: $130k → 14%MEND-MEET EACH NEED WITH DIGNITY: $350k → 14%MEALS ON WHEELS WEST: $350k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$264M · 579 repeat orgs$58M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

579 repeat relationships — 236 still active in FY2024, 343 since wound down; 69 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

579
346

Total granted

$264M
$36M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+19%

Still filing today

68%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KF
    KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS
    5× · 2020–2024 · $6.3M · revenue +26%
  • DH
    DIGNITY HEALTH
    6× · 2019–2024 · $6.1M · revenue +17%
  • SC
    SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
    4× · 2021–2024 · $3.5M · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • CALIFORNIA PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2021 · $1.2M · revenue +8%
  • THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $1.1M · revenue +134%
  • FN
    FIRST NATIONS DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTEgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $850k · revenue +77%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
2
Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd

Huntington Health stands for community. We stand for compassion. But more than anything, Huntington stands for health. Providing world-class health care is our specialty, and it's what we've been doing for the San Gabriel Valley since…

Health
3
Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…

Health
4
United Health Centers of the San Joaquin

The organization is committed to the lifetime wellness of the communities by providing accessible, comprehensive quality health care to everyone with compassion and respect, regardless of ability to pay.

Health
5
California Pan-Ethnic Health Network

To promote health equity by advocating for public policies and sufficient resources to address the health needs of communities of color.

Health
6
Pacific Central Coast Health Centers

Pacific central coast health centers', sponsored by dignity community care, mission is to provide access to cost effective, quality medical services in the northern santa barbara county, san luis obispo county, kern county and ventura…

Health
7
Asian Pacific Health Care Venture Inc

Asian Pacific Health Care Venture, Inc. is a family of community health centers whose mission is to be the medical home for our patients by providing personalized, quality health care services in a culturally accessible manner.

8
Santa Cruz Community Health Centers

Our mission is to improve the health of our patients and the community and advocate the feminist goals of social, political, & economic equality.

Health
9
Via Care Community Health Center

Providing health care services to the poor and underserved of los angeles.

Health
10
San Fernando Community Hospital

Provides primary care, oral health, and behavioral health care, including health education to the community without regard to the ability to pay for services.

Health
11
Equity Health

Our mission is to ensure health care access to quality comprehensive health care services for persons who are medically needy or medically under-served and have traditionally experienced difficulty in getting care from traditional sources.

12
Community Health Partners

Community health partners' mission is to build the valley's premier integrated healthcare delivery system that reliably meets the healthcare needs of our region while exceeding patient expectations.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Education Training and Research Associates and the most unlike its peers is Sac Connect. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealth Access Advocacy and …Community FoundationsSenior Support ServicesImmigrant Worker SupportCommunity FoundationsAffordable Housing Developm…United Way AffiliatesLgbtq+ Community SupportPregnancy Support ServicesYouth Development ServicesPolicy Research and AdvocacyChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Christian Missionary Organi…Community Arts CentersCancer Support ServicesIndependent K-12 SchoolsEnvironmental Conservation …Youth Sports ProgramsAddiction Recovery ServicesYmca Youth DevelopmentCommunity College Foundatio…Women & Girls Leadership De…Food Banks and PantriesDevelopmental Disabilities …Domestic Violence ServicesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%3%<5yr15%7%5–10yr20%17%10–20yr17%23%20–35yr11%23%35–55yr13%28%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%2%<5yr15%4%5–10yr20%15%10–20yr17%20%20–35yr11%21%35–55yr13%38%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%16/1,009
the rest of the field
14%
25,990/185,969

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

699 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 699 of the 1,010 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

51
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
130
Early backer (in before they grew)
680/699
Grantees still filing
512/699
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

RESCUE AGENCY PUBLIC BENEFIT LLC — $18,549,898 · OtherRESCUE AGENCY PUBLIC BENEFIT LLCINTEND INC — $10,684,383 · OtherINTEND INCUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO — $7,015,708 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCOUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA — $5,639,921 · Other+81 more — $69,705,321 · Other+81 moreKAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS — $6,259,365 · HealthKAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALSDIGNITY HEALTH — $6,134,320 · HealthDIGNITY HEALTHMIGRANT CLINICIANS NETWORK INC — $3,504,044 · HealthSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $3,482,881 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $3,309,046 · Health+70 more — $62,378,963 · Health+70 moreUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $5,219,324 · EducationBaylor College of Medicine — $2,375,963 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $1,668,324 · EducationSCHOOL HEALTH CLINICS OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY — $1,000,000 · EducationVISION Y COMPROMISO — $780,133 · EducationWORKER EDUCATION & RESOURCE CENTER INC — $770,000 · EducationTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC — $727,154 · EducationNew York University — $690,842 · EducationEmory University — $684,025 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $620,374 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $610,260 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $590,018 · Education+3 more — $1,456,219 · EducationTIDES CENTER — $1,890,467 · Human ServicesEL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CENTER — $1,351,692 · Human ServicesSpecial Service for Groups Inc — $983,400 · Human ServicesLATINO HEALTH ACCESS — $770,080 · Human ServicesUnited Women of East Africa Support Team — $727,016 · Human ServicesFresno Metropolitan Ministry — $670,847 · Human ServicesASPIRANET — $603,505 · Human ServicesHealthy Alternatives to Violent Environm — $537,774 · Human ServicesCOOK COUNTY FAMILY CONNECTION INC — $470,000 · Human ServicesValley Onward — $470,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY PARTNERS — $2,555,000 · Community ImprovementCALIFORNIA HEALTH M R C — $920,000 · Community ImprovementFresno Building Healthy Communities — $900,000 · Community ImprovementDOLORES C HUERTA FOUNDATION — $601,428 · Community ImprovementCommunity Initiatives For Collective Impact — $582,845 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY COALITION FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT — $450,000 · Community ImprovementSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS — $1,510,250 · PhilanthropyPROVIDENCE ST JOSEPH HEALTH FOUNDATION — $1,395,000 · PhilanthropyPlacer Community Foundation — $625,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY FOX CITIES INC — $474,400 · PhilanthropyHmong Cultural Center of Butte County — $713,529 · Arts & CultureCHICAGO INTERNATIONAL SOCIAL CHANGE FILM FESTIVAL — $694,838 · Arts & CultureLATINO SERVICE PROVIDERS — $572,908 · Arts & CultureKaren Organization of San Diego — $530,000 · Arts & CultureKUTTURAN CHAMORU FOUNDATION — $475,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$111,595,231Health$85,068,619Education$17,192,636Human Services$8,474,781Community Improvement$6,009,273Philanthropy$4,004,650Arts & Culture$2,986,275

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetKAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS — $6,259,365 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDIGNITY HEALTH — $6,134,320 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $5,219,324 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMIGRANT CLINICIANS NETWORK INC — $3,504,044 over 2y, 29% of budgetSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $3,482,881 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $3,309,046 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $2,690,949 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAdventist Health SystemWest — $2,555,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS — $2,555,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine — $2,375,963 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSUTTER BAY HOSPITALS — $2,364,720 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INC — $2,154,641 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF ORANGE COUNTY — $2,063,698 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL ON AGING INC — $1,970,433 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetTIDES CENTER — $1,890,467 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $1,668,324 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Colorado — $1,632,977 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMONSPIRIT HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $1,575,000 over 1y, 67% of budgetUSAGING — $1,573,363 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetSUTTER VALLEY HOSPITALS — $1,568,147 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCORE COMMUNITY ORGANIZED RELIEF EFFORT — $1,553,400 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS — $1,510,250 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $1,473,987 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPROVIDENCE ST JOSEPH HEALTH FOUNDATION — $1,395,000 over 2y, 43% of budgetConejo Health — $1,365,600 over 3y, 67% of budgetEL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CENTER — $1,351,692 over 3y, 6.7% of budgetLOS ANGELES GENERAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $1,320,870 over 7y, 15% of budgetCALIFORNIA PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION — $1,185,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $1,165,000 over 5y, 9.4% of budgetCONSORTIUM OF UNIVERSITIES FOR GLOBAL HEALTH — $1,163,089 over 6y, 27% of budgetVENICE FAMILY CLINIC — $1,159,880 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS AMERICA — $1,144,550 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetGLOBAL HEALTH CORPS INC — $1,130,882 over 2y, 16% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC — $1,113,482 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSCRIPPS HEALTH — $1,109,860 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLUNDQUIST INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL INNOVATION AT HARBOR-UCLA MEDICAL CENTER — $1,094,326 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $1,088,580 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMARIN COMMUNITY CLINIC — $1,078,410 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetSTUDENT HEALTH SERVICES SUPPORT FUND INC dba The LA Trust — $1,078,400 over 2y, 19% of budgetARROWHEAD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $1,072,500 over 6y, 25% of budgetHEALTH IMPROVEMENT PARTNERSHIP OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY — $1,059,872 over 3y, 41% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER — $1,044,596 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA BARBARA NEIGHBORHOOD CLINICS — $1,010,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $1,000,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetEAST VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC — $1,000,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetSCHOOL HEALTH CLINICS OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY — $1,000,000 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetPEDIATRIC AND FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER DBA EISNER HEALTH — $1,000,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION — $1,000,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS
  • Who funds DIGNITY HEALTH
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
  • Who funds MIGRANT CLINICIANS NETWORK INC
  • Who funds SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
  • Who funds Adventist Health SystemWest
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS
  • Who funds Baylor College of Medicine
  • Who funds SUTTER BAY HOSPITALS
  • Who funds PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INC
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF ORANGE COUNTY
  • Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL ON AGING INC
  • Who funds TIDES CENTER
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Colorado
  • Who funds COMMONSPIRIT HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE
  • Who funds USAGING
  • Who funds SUTTER VALLEY HOSPITALS
  • Who funds CORE COMMUNITY ORGANIZED RELIEF EFFORT
  • Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE ST JOSEPH HEALTH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Conejo Health
  • Who funds EL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CENTER
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES GENERAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Children's Oncology Group Foundation IncPA134.2× affinity72 shared granteesties to 6 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Children's Oncology Group Foundation Inc · Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management · The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · California Health Foundation and Trust · Cystic Fibrosis Foundation · The California Endowment · California Healthcare Foundation · California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The California Wellness Foundation · Latino Community Foundation · Essential Access Health

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Public Health Institute funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University12% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
58report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Public Health Institute?

Find your warmest path to Public Health Institute through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 1010 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph