Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

CALIFORNIA CONSORTIUM FOR URBAN INDIAN HEALTH

CALIFORNIA CONSORTIUM FOR URBAN INDIAN HEALTH (California) receives grants from 23 organizations whose IRS filings report $4,836,930 to it, the largest being KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ($1,230,000). 9 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$3.0M
Funders on record
23
Grants received
$4.8M
Net assets
$2.1M
9/23 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 49%
01What it does

What California Consortium for Urban Indian Health does

Mission

The mission of ccuih is to facilitate shared development resources for our members and to raise public awareness in order to support a health and wellness network that meets the needs of american indians living in urban communities in california.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Community health: ccuih leads collaborative, community health organizing efforts toincrease access to and improve the quality of health care for urban indiancommunities. Ccuihs strategies are focused on increasing capacity and improvingorganizational efficacy for their urban indian health network. Ccuih leverages uioclinic leadership, as well as grassroots community-guided efforts, to address policyneeds and health care inequities for american indians and alaskanatives living incalifornia. Ccuih maintained a full membership of all ten (10) urban indianorganizations in california. Ccuih hosted very successful statewide conferenceproviding ta to ccuih members and stakeholders.

    $2,181,643 spentof which $3,635 as grants
    93% of program spending
  2. Policy advocacy: ccuih is a statewide resource on urban indian health information and related policy decisions. Ccuih monitors legislation and policy regarding local,state, and federal health care initiatives to ensure that urban indians are includedin planning efforts increase health care access and reduce health disparities ofmarginalized groups. Ccuih participates in indian consultations and distributespolicy briefs and position statements on relevant urban indian issues. Ccuih alsofoster collaboration and partnerships with regional community consortia, national,state, and local agencies, and other strategic partners including: the californiaprimary care association, national council of urban indian health, california ruralindian health board, and the urban indian health institute.

    $172,091 spent
    7% of program spending

The 2 programs described on its FY2023 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $2,353,734.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($749k) Expenses 100 ($576k) Net assets 100 ($497k)2018 Revenue 100 ($753k) Expenses 130 ($748k) Net assets 101 ($502k)2019 Revenue 220 ($1.6M) Expenses 256 ($1.5M) Net assets 136 ($676k)2020 Revenue 282 ($2.1M) Expenses 326 ($1.9M) Net assets 183 ($911k)2021 Revenue 328 ($2.5M) Expenses 369 ($2.1M) Net assets 250 ($1.2M)2022 Revenue 307 ($2.3M) Expenses 403 ($2.3M) Net assets 245 ($1.2M)2023 Revenue 549 ($4.1M) Expenses 463 ($2.7M) Net assets 536 ($2.7M)2024 Revenue 332 ($2.5M) Expenses 517 ($3.0M) Net assets 438 ($2.2M)2025 Revenue 397 ($3.0M) Expenses 533 ($3.1M) Net assets 420 ($2.1M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (397)Expenses (533)Net assets (420)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $1.4M to $3.1M (+127%).

$583k
$536k
$723k
$1.3M
$1.5M
$1.4M
$3.1M
$2.5M
$2.4M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2018 17% · 2019 60% · 2020 47% · 2021 49% · 2022 51% · 2023 55% · 2024 32% · 2025 8%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$173k
’17
$5k
’18
$174k
’19
$235k
’20
$333k
’21
−$25k
’22
$1.4M
’23
−$489k
’24
−$98k
’25
2.4
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed111111111111111515
Joined·+1+2+4+2+1+2+6+2
No longer listed·12421222
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 3 funders to 10 funders, grant income rose $352k → $837k.

6 of 23 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 9% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of CALIFORNIA CONSORTIUM FOR URBAN INDIAN HEALTH’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

CALIFORNIA CONSORTIUM FOR URBAN INDIAN HEALTH has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 25% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

58% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund CALIFORNIA CONSORTIUM FOR URBAN INDIAN HEALTH.

25%
largest funder
54%
top three
~7
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 57% · 2018 50% · 2019 65% · 2020 43% · 2021 42% · 2022 71% · 2023 27% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

71% of CALIFORNIA CONSORTIUM FOR URBAN INDIAN HEALTH's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 39% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

98% of CALIFORNIA CONSORTIUM FOR URBAN INDIAN HEALTH's grant income comes from California funders.

CA
CO
DE
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $440k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like CALIFORNIA CONSORTIUM FOR URBAN INDIAN HEALTH

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

75% of spending goes to programs.

Program 75%Management 24%Fundraising 1%

Governance

10
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

77%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CALIFORNIA CONSORTIUM FOR URBAN INDIAN HEALTH: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds CALIFORNIA CONSORTIUM FOR URBAN INDIAN HEALTH?
CALIFORNIA CONSORTIUM FOR URBAN INDIAN HEALTH (California) receives grants from 23 organizations whose IRS filings report $4,836,930 to it, the largest being KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ($1,230,000). 9 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does CALIFORNIA CONSORTIUM FOR URBAN INDIAN HEALTH have?
IRS filings report 23 organizations giving $4,836,930 in grants to CALIFORNIA CONSORTIUM FOR URBAN INDIAN HEALTH, 9 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of CALIFORNIA CONSORTIUM FOR URBAN INDIAN HEALTH?
KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS is the largest funder on record, with $1,230,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like CALIFORNIA CONSORTIUM FOR URBAN INDIAN HEALTH find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 23 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing