How much did LATINO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

Human Services$4.9MCommunity Improvement$4.7MArts & Culture$2.5MPhilanthropy$2.2MEducation$1.8MCivil Rights$1.7MYouth Development$1.5MEmployment$1.4MHealth$1.1MOther$7.5M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

empower inspirechccgraduatesjohn'sachievementaim girlslearn stem

2020

econ pwrpwr rapidrapid respcore rapidcore econpreconpr rapidrescore civic&econ

2021

econ pwrpwr rapidrapid respcore rapidmontessoriyoung menmen color

2022

pwr rpdrpd rspbldg pwrbldg civciv pwrbldg ecoeco pwr

2023

building buildinguscprivatevisualartisticsectorlatin

2024

corporationsmall businessdeveloping leadersbusiness ownersbudgetiactransformative

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 96 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k14 grants · $105k
$10k–50k43 grants · $885k
$50k–250k35 grants · $2.5M
$250k+4 grants · $1.1M

$28,000

Median grant

States reached

$60M

Total assets

Largest grants

COMITE CIVICO DEL VALLE INC$285,000
COMMUNITY INITIATIVES$268,900
NORTH BAY ORGANIZING PROJECT$255,000
DREXEL UNIVERSITY$250,000
TIDES FOUNDATION$138,000
RAIZES COLLECTIVE$115,000
UPVALLEY FAMILY CENTERS OF NAPA COUNTY$115,000
COALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS$100,000
VALLEY VOICES$90,000
COMMUNITY OVERCOMING RELATIONSHIP ABUSE$84,750
TMC COMMUNITY CAPITAL$77,700
AL OTRO LADO$75,000
EL PAJARO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$75,000
THE PARTNERSHIP PROJECT$75,000
CALIFORNIA BUDGET & POLICY CENTER$75,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $4.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 11%. 31% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$24M · 157 repeat orgs$5.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +154% since the first grant, against +137% for the ones you funded once.

157 repeat relationships — 71 still active in FY2024, 86 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

157

123

Total granted

$24M

$4.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+154%

+137%

Still filing today

94%

84%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.0M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

NB
North Bay Organizing Project
6× · 2019–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +22%
Community Initiatives
6× · 2019–2024 · $893k · revenue +111%
COMITE CIVICO DEL VALLE INC
5× · 2020–2024 · $719k · revenue +432%

Funded once

FC
FAMILIA CRISTIANA VERBO
one grant, 2021 · $225k
NA
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR LATINO COMMUNITY ASSET BUILDERSgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $200k · revenue +341%
DC
DAFFY CHARITABLE FUNDgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $175k · revenue +1985%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

El Concilio California

Empowering diverse communities in california's central valley.

Human Services

Latina Coalition of Silicon Valley

Our Mission is to develop and strengthen the power of Latinas to advance our collective success through sisterhood, leadership, and civic engagement.

Public Benefit

La Raza Centro Legal - San Francisco

La Raza Centro Legal San Francisco provides high quality, highly trusted, free legal services to low-income or immigrant clients in the San Francisco Bay Area.

—

Fuerza LaboralPower of Workers

Fuerza Laboral is a workers' rights center whose mission is to shift the balance of power in our economy in favor of workers by educating, training, and organizing workers to become community leaders; taking direct action to recover unpaid…

Education

La Comunidad Inc

Legal, immigration and community organizing

—

Colectiva Legal Del Pueblo

Colectiva Legal del Pueblo is a non-hierarchal collective organization founded for and by undocumented immigrants working to build community leadership and power for migrant justice through legal services, advocacy and education.

Civil Rights

California Competes

California Competes: Higher Education for a Strong Economy is a nonpartisan policy and research organization focused on identifying solutions to the states most critical challenges at the intersection of higher education, equity, and the…

Education

Latino Community Foundation

Lcf exists to unleash the civic and economic power of latinos in california.

Human Services

Latin American Coalition

The Coalition is dedicated to educating Latino immigrant newcomers, celebrating hispanic culture, and advocating for underserved segments of the population. Programs and initiatives include economic development, legal counsel, community…

Human Services

Latino Business Chamber of Greater La

To facilitate economic structures and policy initiatives that empower Latino business development and foster economic growth across Los Angeles.

Human Services

Colorado Latino Leadership Advocacy &

Empowering Latino communities through leadership development, advocacy, and policy research to strengthen Colorado

—

Los Cenzontles Mexican Arts Center

Los Cenzontles is an innovative Lat- ino-led arts organization that cultivates young voices, builds strong and vibrant communities, and raises awareness of Latino culture in America through partici- patory cultural programming, outreach,…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Services Immigrant Rights and and the most unlike its peers is Drexel University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

3%8/305

the rest of the field

12%

15,181/128,927

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

283 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

138

Early backer (in before they grew)

274/283

Grantees still filing

239/283

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Human Services$4,874,100Community Improvement$4,656,103Other$11,543,813Arts & Culture$2,548,650Philanthropy$2,185,650Education$1,838,530Civil Rights$1,728,660

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sierra Health FoundationCA117.7× affinity70 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sierra Health Foundation · The California Endowment · The California Wellness Foundation · The James Irvine Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Weingart Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · Public Health Institute · Liberty Hill Foundation · Immigrant Legal Resource Center · The Sobrato Family Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation LATINO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: XINAMPA.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

high risk

2 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing.

Legal standing

medium risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 834059672 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on XINAMPA, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 68% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Latino Community Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Latino Community Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

LATINO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

283 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Latino Community Foundation?

More from the funding graph

LATINO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

283 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Latino Community Foundation?

More from the funding graph