Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC STRATEGIES

INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC STRATEGIES (California) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,028,872 to it, the largest being Public Health Institute ($778,400). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$6.4M
Funders on record
4
Grants received
$1.0M
Net assets
$1.5M
2/4 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 0%
01What it does

What Institute for Public Strategies does

Mission

Institute of Public Strategies (IPS) is a nonprofit corporation that receives its funding from local and federal governmental agencies and private foundations, through long-term grants or contracts to provide community-level services within specified regions or communities. IPS helps community partners prevent problems by focusing on the community conditions (the social determinants of health) that negatively influence population-level health outcomes.IPS vision is safe, secure, vibrant, and healthy communities where everyone can thrive. The mission of IPS is to work alongside communities to build power, challenge systems of injustice, protect health, and improve quality of life. IPS accomplishes this by providing community partners and youth with training, technical assistance, and tools to impact public health, public safety, equity, and social justice through systems change.IPS corporate office is in San Diego, California, and we have four additional offices located throughout South

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Alcohol and Drug Prevention:IPS provides community-based, population-level, environmental prevention services related to alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs in three counties and more than a dozen cities across Southern California. Through community-driven policy change at institutional and municipal levels, IPS strives to reduce underage and binge drinking and substance use disorders, as well as eliminate exposure to second-hand smoke in multi-unit housing complexes and in open areas such as parks, beaches, and festivals. The goal is to create lasting social, cultural, physical, legal, and/or political changes in communities with a focus on policies, systems, and environmental factors that will prevent and reduce ATOD problems.

    $3,294,400 spent
    70% of program spending
  2. Youth Leadership DevelopmentIPS facilitates Youth in Action, a coalition of immigrant youth ages 16-20 disproportionately impacted by the War on Drugs, and a #SanDiegoVibes campaign created for youth by youth. Youth are trained in leadership, Youth-led Participatory Action Research, and advocacy. They explore historical divestment in their communities and select and champion policy, systems, and environmental changes to create more equitable neighborhoods. In addition, IPS enhances behavioral health literacy, reduces stigma, and promotes help-seeking behavior in the Latine community of San Diego Countys Border Region. Rooted in Social Justice Youth Development, our approach centers on the co-creation of a digital mental health platform that integrates youth-crafted mental health contentvisuals, storytelling, music, and creative arts. We are establishing a culturally resonant and scalable online community for Latine youth and a blueprint for positive change in mental health education and support.

    $1,001,833 spent
    21% of program spending
  3. Health Equity:To support health equity and reduce health disparities, IPS is part of a California Statewide Trusted Messenger Network that builds trust with communities through on-the-ground engagement. IPS also advances health equity in communities to prevent behavioral health disparities in underage drinking rates, substance use disorders, and death related to opioid and meth use. By reflecting the language and culture of the communities we serve, IPS has authentic community interactions to provide accurate information and resources on critical issues. Health and behavioral health problems are more common in certain communities based on historical divestment, socio-economic status, and other demographic characteristics. Therefore, the program focuses on making community conditions more equitable so all communities can thrive.

    $380,636 spent
    8% of program spending
  4. Environmental Justice:IPS assists with the development of an environmental justice project led by the Resource Conservation District of Greater San Diego County, which will create shovel-ready restoration plans for 15 acres within Otay Valley Regional Park. This once-monoculture eucalyptus grove will be transformed through native habitat restoration, enhanced wildlife corridors, improved stormwater infiltration and water quality, and enriched public access. With the Institute for Public Strategies serving as the community engagement and stewardship lead, the project will ensure that grassroots voicesincluding immigrant youth, tribal partners, and neighborhood residentsshape the design and take ownership of the long-term restoration legacy. Community workshops, youth ambassador programming, public-access design, and a volunteer stewardship framework will anchor the projects sustainability. The result: a restored natural asset that connects wildlife, filters water, provides equitable access to nature, and builds local leadership.

    $2,740 spent
    0% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $4,679,609.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($3.0M) Expenses 100 ($3.0M) Net assets 100 ($443k)2018 Revenue 109 ($3.3M) Expenses 109 ($3.3M) Net assets 99 ($437k)2019 Revenue 109 ($3.3M) Expenses 109 ($3.3M) Net assets 99 ($438k)2020 Revenue 112 ($3.4M) Expenses 112 ($3.4M) Net assets 100 ($441k)2021 Revenue 110 ($3.3M) Expenses 111 ($3.3M) Net assets 97 ($431k)2022 Revenue 120 ($3.6M) Expenses 120 ($3.6M) Net assets 97 ($431k)2023 Revenue 157 ($4.7M) Expenses 155 ($4.7M) Net assets 111 ($492k)2024 Revenue 162 ($4.9M) Expenses 154 ($4.6M) Net assets 164 ($725k)2025 Revenue 212 ($6.4M) Expenses 186 ($5.6M) Net assets 338 ($1.5M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (212)Expenses (186)Net assets (338)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $1.4M to $2.9M (+114%).

$1.2M
$1.2M
$1.1M
$1.1M
$1.1M
$1.4M
$2.9M
$3.2M
$3.7M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2019 100% · 2020 99% · 2021 99% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% · 2024 94% · 2025 91%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

100% of INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC STRATEGIES’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (51% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 8,611 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$752
’17
−$6k
’18
$739
’19
$4k
’20
−$11k
’21
$403
’22
$61k
’23
$232k
’24
$773k
’25
3.5
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Brenda Simmons

CEO

Board chair

Richard Yoast

Chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed161921131415141117
Joined·+3+4+2+2+2+0+0+6
No longer listed·021011130
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2018 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income rose $0 → $93.

Funder
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
total
funders
1
1
1
1
2
2
3

1 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 0% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC STRATEGIES’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 3 of 4 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC STRATEGIES leans on a few funders — its largest provides 76% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

76% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC STRATEGIES.

76%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC STRATEGIES's grant income comes from California funders.

CA

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $472 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC STRATEGIES runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 4,665 health nonprofits its size.

Operating margin12% · above the median
Months of reserve3.5mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)10% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 4,665 health nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Government funding INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC STRATEGIES receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $1.8M on record.

Federal$1.8M
grants $1.8Mcontracts $0
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Top agencies
  • Department of Health and Human Services$1.8M

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC STRATEGIES

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

83% of spending goes to programs.

Program 83%Management 17%Fundraising 0%

Governance

11
board members
91%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • Global Institute for Public Strategies · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC STRATEGIES: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC STRATEGIES?
INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC STRATEGIES (California) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,028,872 to it, the largest being Public Health Institute ($778,400). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC STRATEGIES have?
IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $1,028,872 in grants to INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC STRATEGIES, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC STRATEGIES?
Public Health Institute is the largest funder on record, with $778,400 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC STRATEGIES find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Institute for Public Strategies →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 4 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing