Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

California · Nonprofit

ACCMA COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION

ACCMA COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION (California) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $906,500 to it, the largest being STUPSKI FOUNDATION ($480,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$555k
Revenue FY2024
6
Funders on record
$907k
Grants received
$588k
Net assets
2/6 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 96%

Against its field

ACCMA COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 13,726 health nonprofits its size.

Operating margin42% · top quartile
Months of reserve25.6mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)33% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 13,726 health nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($76k) Expenses 100 ($205k) Net assets 100 ($152k)2018 Revenue 208 ($158k) Expenses 72 ($147k) Net assets 108 ($163k)2019 Revenue 450 ($343k) Expenses 112 ($231k) Net assets 181 ($275k)2020 Revenue 1087 ($829k) Expenses 254 ($520k) Net assets 384 ($584k)2021 Revenue 281 ($214k) Expenses 218 ($448k) Net assets 230 ($350k)2022 Revenue 287 ($218k) Expenses 71 ($146k) Net assets 278 ($422k)2023 Revenue 158 ($121k) Expenses 92 ($189k) Net assets 233 ($354k)2024 Revenue 728 ($555k) Expenses 156 ($320k) Net assets 387 ($588k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (728)Expenses (156)Net assets (387)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2019 41% · 2020 18% · 2021 60% · 2022 27% · 2023 55% · 2024 36%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

106% of ACCMA COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (83% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 14,844 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$129k
17
$11k
18
$112k
19
$308k
20
$234k
21
$72k
22
$69k
23
$235k
24
26
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2021: the base held at 1 funder, grant income rose $5k → $150k.

Left out of every figure on this page: $747k from one payer (the payer shares this organization's board, largest Alameda-Contra Costa Medical Association). These are real filings, and they are not money ACCMA COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION raised.

From the IRS filings of ACCMA COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

ACCMA COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 53% of grant income and the top three 97%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

44% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund ACCMA COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION.

53%
largest funder
97%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 99% · 2020 100% · 2021 100%broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

59% of ACCMA COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION's grant income comes from California funders.

CA
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
20
21
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 6 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like ACCMA COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

85% of spending goes to programs.

Program 85%Management 15%Fundraising 0%

Governance

7
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • Alameda-Contra Costa Medical Association · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for ACCMA COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds ACCMA COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION?
ACCMA COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION (California) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $906,500 to it, the largest being STUPSKI FOUNDATION ($480,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does ACCMA COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION have?
IRS filings report 6 organizations giving $906,500 in grants to ACCMA COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of ACCMA COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION?
STUPSKI FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $480,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like ACCMA COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 6funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing