California · Nonprofit
HEALTH IN PARTNERSHIP
HEALTH IN PARTNERSHIP (California) receives grants from 25 organizations whose IRS filings report $20,677,570 to it, the largest being THE CALIFORNIA ENDOWMENT ($5,375,961). 15 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
HEALTH IN PARTNERSHIP runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 4,665 health nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 4,665 health nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- The Heising-Simons Foundationshared funders
- National Network of Public Health Institutes Incportfolio match
- Civitas Networks for Healthportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2020 8%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
91% of HEALTH IN PARTNERSHIP’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (51% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 7 funders to 9 funders, grant income rose $1.8M → $3.1M.
7 of 25 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 3% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of HEALTH IN PARTNERSHIP’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
HEALTH IN PARTNERSHIP has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 26% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 37% · 2018 55% · 2019 38% · 2020 30% · 2021 43% · 2022 17% · 2023 41% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How long its funders stay
27% of HEALTH IN PARTNERSHIP's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 60% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.
Where its funders are
HEALTH IN PARTNERSHIP draws 65% of its grant income from funders outside California, across 7 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $537k arriving through sponsors registered in 4 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 25 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
- The Heising-Simons Foundationshared fundersCA · backs 155 organizations that share your funders
- National Network of Public Health Institutes Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Civitas Networks for Healthportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- American Public Health Associationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Rx Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Center for Science in the Public Interestportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- De Beaumont Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Association of Maternal and Child Health Programsportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Drug Policy Allianceportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- National Alliance of State and Territorial AIDS Directorsdba Nastadportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Voices for Racial Justiceportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Evelyn and Walter Haas Jr Fundshared fundersCA · backs 88 organizations that share your funders
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like HEALTH IN PARTNERSHIP
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In California
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
82% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
22%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for HEALTH IN PARTNERSHIP: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds HEALTH IN PARTNERSHIP?
- HEALTH IN PARTNERSHIP (California) receives grants from 25 organizations whose IRS filings report $20,677,570 to it, the largest being THE CALIFORNIA ENDOWMENT ($5,375,961). 15 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does HEALTH IN PARTNERSHIP have?
- IRS filings report 25 organizations giving $20,677,570 in grants to HEALTH IN PARTNERSHIP, 15 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of HEALTH IN PARTNERSHIP?
- THE CALIFORNIA ENDOWMENT is the largest funder on record, with $5,375,961 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like HEALTH IN PARTNERSHIP find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 25funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported September 23, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing