· Public charity
California Health Foundation and Trust
Support access, research, and education in the fields of healthcare delivery, financing, and patient care.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $16k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $96k
- $250k+7 grants · $53M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN | $20,357,237 |
| CEDARS-SINAI | $16,895,228 |
| CEDARS-SINAI | $11,734,209 |
| HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN | $1,328,864 |
| HENRY MAYO NEWHALL HOSPITAL | $1,299,212 |
| HENRY MAYO NEWHALL HOSPITAL | $874,632 |
| USC ARCADIA HOSPITAL | $298,404 |
| EASTERN PLUMAS HEALTH CARE | $16,500 |
| PROVIDENCE ST JOSEPH HEALTH | $13,500 |
| PLUMAS DISTRICT HOSPITAL | $12,200 |
| GEORGE L MEE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL | $12,000 |
| MAYERS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL DISTRICT | $11,500 |
| COMMUNITY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL - OJAI | $10,250 |
| HEALDSBURG HOSPITAL | $10,000 |
| HAZEL HAWKINS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.
32 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER6× · 2017–2024 · $106M · revenue +63%- HMHOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN2× · 2023–2024 · $31M · revenue +15%
- EMEisenhower Medical Center3× · 2017–2020 · $30M · revenue +94%
Funded once
- OMOLYMPIA MEDICAL CENTERone grant, 2020 · $15M
- TMTHE MEDICAL STAFF OF OLYMPIA MEDICAL CENTERone grant, 2017 · $4.4M
- HMHENRY MAYO NEWHALL MEMORIAL HEALTH FOUNDATIONone grant, 2017 · $2.3M · revenue -15% · 63% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…
MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…
Ucsf health community hospital's mission statement is caring, healing, teaching, and discovering.
Living God's love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.
To operate and maintain a general acute care hospital and related facilities for the acute care of persons suffering from illnesses or disabilities, and for the continuing care of persons needing rehabilitation and the custodial care of…
Living God's love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.
Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…
Living God's love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.
Living Gods love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.
Fresno community hospital and medical center's (fch&mc's) exists to better the lives of all those we serve
MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…
Living God's love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Hospitals of Central California and the most unlike its peers is Seton Medical Center Howard B Grobstein Liquidating Trustee. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 60 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.6% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
73 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 73 of the 162 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN ↗
- Who funds Eisenhower Medical Center ↗
- Who funds HENRY MAYO NEWHALL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds USC ARCADIA HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HOSPITAL OF THE MONTEREY PENINSULA ↗
- Who funds THE MEDICAL STAFF OF OLYMPIA MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds CHINESE HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds HENRY MAYO NEWHALL MEMORIAL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE ST JOSEPH HEALTH ↗
- Who funds DIGNITY HEALTH ↗
- Who funds Adventist Health SystemWest ↗
- Who funds SUTTER HEALTH ↗
- Who funds Sharp Healthcare ↗
- Who funds SCRIPPS HEALTH ↗
- Who funds PIH Health Inc ↗
- Who funds MEMORIAL HEALTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds ST FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER HOWARD B GROBSTEIN LIQUIDATING TRUSTEE ↗
- Who funds KECK MEDICAL CENTER OF USC ↗
- Who funds LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY HEALTH ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO REGIONAL HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds VALLEY PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds Emanate Health ↗
- Who funds STANFORD HEALTH CARE ↗
- Who funds MARTIN LUTHER KING JR-LOS ANGELES HEALTHCARE CORPORATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Public Health Institute · California Academy of Family Physicians Foundation · Direct Relief · American Cancer Society Inc · QueensCare · California Fire Safe Council Inc · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · North Valley Community Foundation · California Green Business Network · Safe Kids Worldwide · Essential Access Health · Scan Health Plan
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization California Health Foundation and Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.